The use of the long peroneal muscle tendon as an autograft during the primary plastics of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review
- Authors: Prizov A.P.1,2, Vostrikov A.M.1, Skvortsov D.V.3,4, Lazko F.L.1,2, Lazko M.F.1,2, Belyak E.A.1,2, Krytaeva A.V.5
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute
- City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov
- Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies
- The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov
- The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 59-69
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/clinpractice/article/view/278596
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract629185
- ID: 278596
Cite item
Abstract
The anterior cruciate ligament injuries take the leading place among all the injuries of the knee joint. The rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament most frequently occurs during sports-related and high-energy traumas. The aim of the present systematic review is to compare the results obtained after the anterior cruciate ligament plastics with using the long peroneal muscle tendon and the autograft made from the common tendon of the semitendinous and gracilis muscles. The analysis includes the original articles from the PubMed, Google Scholar, eLibrary, Scopus and Web of Science search systems. The key words for the search included (“peroneus longus tendon” or “fibularis longus tendon”) and (“anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” or “ACL reconstruction”). In the Russian data bases, the same terms were used. From the articles found, the following parameters were extracted: the evaluation of the functional results using the Tegner–Lysholm scale and the questionnaire for subjective assessment of the status among the patients with various knee joint injuries — IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee); the evaluation of the mean diameter of the autotransplant; the instability of the knee joint; as well as the possible complications; the evaluation of the functions in the ankle joint and the foot using the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) and FADI (Foot and Ankle Disability Index) scales. These parameters were used for evaluating the clinical research works on using the autograft made from the long peroneal muscle tendon for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The authors have analyzed the treatment results in 2322 patients which underwent anterior cruciate ligament plastics using the long peroneal muscle tendon (n=1660) and the semitendinous muscle tendon (n=662) autotransplants. The parameters of the postoperative status according to the AOFAS and FADI scales for the long peroneal muscle tendon were 96.47±2.71 and 97.72±2.58, respectively, which does not differ from the uninjured side (p >0.05). The best IKDC scale scores were 94.13±4.66 for the long peroneal muscle tendon and 95.12±0.73 for the semitendinous muscle tendon, while the scores of the Tegner–Lysholm scale were 99.15±2.89 and 99.85±0.37, respectively. Thus, the autograft made using the long peroneal muscle tendon is a proper alternative for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, for it is located outside the area of the knee joint.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Aleksey P. Prizov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute; City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov
Email: aprizov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3092-9753
SPIN-code: 6979-6480
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAnatoly M. Vostrikov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.vos3kov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7484-3363
SPIN-code: 2150-5501
Russian Federation, Moscow
Dmitry V. Skvortsov
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies; The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov
Email: dskvorts63@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2794-4912
SPIN-code: 6274-4448
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowFedor L. Lazko
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute; City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov
Email: fedor_lazko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5292-7930
SPIN-code: 8504-7290
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMaxim F. Lazko
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute; City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov
Email: maxim_lazko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6346-824X
SPIN-code: 9664-8492
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowEvgeniy A. Belyak
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Medical Institute; City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov
Email: belyakevgen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2542-8308
SPIN-code: 7337-1214
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAlexandra V. Krytaeva
The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
Email: bitinaa@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Migliorini F, Pintore A, Vecchio G. Hamstring, bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps and peroneus longus tendon autografts for primary isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2022;142(1):23–33. EDN: QAHAKH doi: 10.1093/bmb/idac010
- Rothrauff BB, Jorge A, de Sa D, et al. Anatomic ACL reconstruction reduces risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis: A systematic review with minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2020;28(4):1072–1084. EDN: MNBTVS doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05665-2
- Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, et al. Is anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction effective in preventing secondary meniscal tears and osteoarthritis? Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1699–1707. doi: 10.1177/0363546516634325
- Phatama KY, Hidayat M, Mustamsir E, et al. Tensile strength comparison between hamstring tendon, patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon: A cadaver research. J Arthrosscopy Joint Surg. 2019;6(2):114–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jajs.2019.02.003
- Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2011(9):CD005960. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2
- Cristiani R, Forssblad M, Engström B, et al. Risk factors for abnormal anteroposterior knee laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(8):2478–2484. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.038
- Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, Palmieri-Smith RM. Muscle atrophy contributes to quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Science Med Sport. 2016;19:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.009
- Nazem K, Barzegar M, Hosseini A, Karimi M. Can we use peroneus longus in addition to hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:115. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.132696
- Исмаилов Д.А., Лазко Ф.Л., Абдулхабиров М.А., и др. Анатомо-биомеханическое обоснование расположения большеберцового туннеля при однопучковой реконструкции передней крестообразной связки // Врач-аспирант. 2015. Т. 70, № 3-1. С. 117–126. [Ismayilov DA, Lazko FL, Kopylov AA, et al. Anatomo-biomechanical reasoning of arrangment of tunnel in tibia during single bundle reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. Vrach-Aspirant. 2015;70(3-1):117–126]. EDN: VKUICX
- Kerimoğlu S, Aynaci O, Saraçoğlu M, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):38–43. doi: 10.3944/aott.2008.038
- Zhao J, Huangfu X. The biomechanical and clinical application of using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon as an autograft source. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):662–671. doi: 10.1177/0363546511428782
- Lukman R, Mustamsir E, Phatama YK. Tensile strength comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring tendons: A biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open. 2017;9(С):41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2017.10.002
- He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869–2879. EDN: YPUNHU doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9
- Fermín MT, Hovsepian JM, Symeonidis PD, et al. Insufficient evidence to support peroneus longus tendon over other autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. J ISAKOS. 2021;6(3):161–169. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000501
- Khajotia B, Chauhan S, Sethia R, Chopra B. Functional outcome of arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Indian J Orthop Surg. 2018;4:898–903. doi: 10.18231/j.ijos.2023.042
- Sakti M, Biakto KT, Usman MA, et al. Predicting the peroneus longus tendon autograft size in ACL reconstruction by using anthropometric parameters: A study in South Sulawesi population. J Orthopaedics. 2020;22:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.011
- Shao X, Shi LL, Bluman EM, et al. Satisfactory functional and MRI outcomes at the foot and ankle following harvesting of full thickness peroneus longus tendon graft. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(2): 205–211. doi: 0.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0949.R1
- Song X, Li Q, Wu Z, et al. Predicting the graft diameter of the peroneus longus tendon for ACL reconstruction. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(44):e12672. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012672
- Wu C, Xie G, Jin W, et al. Arthroscopic graftlink technique reconstruction combined with suture anchor fxation for anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries. Chinese J Reparative Reconstructive Surg. 2019;33(6):685–688. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201812062
- Гончаров Е.Н., Гончаров Н.Г., Безуглов Э.Н., и др. Сравнение результатов восстановления передней крестообразной связки коленного сустава с использованием аутотрансплантата из сухожилия длинной малоберцовой мышцы голени и из связки надколенника с двумя костными блоками // Гений ортопедии. 2022. Т. 28, № 1. С. 53–61. [Goncharov EN, Goncharov NG, Bezuglov EN, et al. Comparison of results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee joint using peroneus longus tendon autograft or patellar tendon autograft with two bone blocks. Geniy ortopedii. 2022;28(1):53–61]. EDN: CRBQYG
- Quinn M, Byrne RA, Albright JA, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft may present a viable alternative for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2024;40(4):1366–1376.e1. EDN: FVFKEC doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.016
- Rhatomy S, Asikin AI, Wardani AE, et al. Peroneus longus autograft can be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring tendon in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 2019;27(11):3552–3559. EDN: XGAQYU doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05455-w
- Page Matthew J, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
- Yu H, Deng W, Sang P, Liu Y. Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with autologous ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. Arthroscopy. 2020;34(7):843–847. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.099
- Zeng J, Huang J, Liu Z, Xia H. Influence of peroneus longus tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction on donor-side ankle function in obese patients: A retrospective study of 87 patients. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(11):5305–5307. EDN: YEDDZL doi: 10.51273/esc24.251320110
- Bi M, Zhao C, Zhang Q, et al. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(6):2325967121991226. doi: 10.1177/2325967121991226
- Cakar A, Kose O, Selcuk H, et al. Complications of peroneus longus tendon harvesting: A retrospective review of 82 cases. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2023;143(11):6675–6684. EDN: XOTRQE doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04988-7
- Trung DT, Manh SL, Thanh LN, et al. Preliminary result of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using anterior half of peroneus longus tendon autograft. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2019;7(24):4351–4356. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.390
- Hossain GM, Islam MS, Rahman Khan MM, et al. A prospective study of arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft: Experience of 439 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(9):e32943. EDN: XIGZZF doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032943
- Rhatomy S, Hartoko L, Setyawan R, et al. Single bundle ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-years follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl. 3):S332–S336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.004
- Ertilav D. Relation of peroneus longus autograft dimensions with anthropometric parameters in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Importance of the distal leg diameter. Joint Diseases Related Surg. 2021;32(1):137–143. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2021.79580
- Rajani AM, Shah UA, Mittal AR, et al. Functional and clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft and correlation with MRI after 3 years. J Orthopaedics. 2022;34:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.08.027
- Rhatomy S, Wicaksono FH, Soekarno NR, et al. Eversion and first ray plantarflexion muscle strength in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a peroneus longus tendon graft. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(9):2325967119872462. doi: 10.1177/2325967119872462
- Yadav U, Nemani M, Devgun A, et al. Iatrogenic foot drop after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon autograft: Report of a rare case. Cureus. 2022;14(6):e26476. EDN: ISSEZT doi: 10.7759/cureus.26476
- Joshi S, Shetty UC, Salim MD, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A safe and effective alternative in nonathletic patients. Nigerian J Surg. 2021;27(1):42–47. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20
- Лычагин А.В., Алиев Р.И., Богатов В.Б., и др. Применение сухожилия длинной малоберцовой мышцы при пластике передней крестообразной связки: биомеханические свойства трансплантата, корреляционные взаимосвязи // Российский журнал биомеханики. 2020. Т. 24, № 4. С. 505–512. [Lychagin AV, Aliev RL, Bogatov VB, et al. Application of the long fibular tendon in anterior cruciate ligament plastic surgery: Biomechanical properties of the graft, correlation relationships. Russ J Biomechanics. 2020;24(4):505–512]. EDN: OTBMXT doi: 10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2020.4.08
- Ge Z, Wang B, Zhang X, Zhang S. Clinical outcomes and donor site morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with full thickness peroneus longus tendon. ResearchGate; 2020. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-127706/v1
- Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft is a safe and efective alternative for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2018;32:804–811. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669951
- Zhao Z, Tang L, Chen J, et al. The effect of harvesting the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon on foot morphology and gait. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):69. EDN: SKBKJX doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04429-6
- Saeed UB, Ramzan A, Anwar M, et al. Earlier return to sports, reduced donor-site morbidity with doubled peroneus longus versus quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(4):e23.00051. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00051
- Agarwal A, Singh S, Singh A, Tewari P. Comparison of functional outcomes of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a peroneus longus graft as an alternative to the hamstring tendon graft. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37273. EDN: AMVMKH doi: 10.7759/cureus.37273
- Keyhani S, Qoreishi M, Mousavi M, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparative study with a mean follow-up of two years. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2022;10(8):695–701. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.59568.2938
- Wierer G, Gwinner C, Scheffler S. Peroneus longus split versus semitendinosus tendon autograft size: A cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(7):1743–1751. EDN: GTZBDC doi: 10.1177/03635465231165297
Supplementary files
