Sex differences in the connectome of the human brain according to an MR-tractography study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: The gender differences in the brain anatomy play an important role in planning and analysis in a lot of studies of the brain. Despite most animal studies being performed on the animals of only one sex, clinical studies generally enroll both males and females. Keeping this fact in mind, learning the gender differences in the white matter structure is important for those studies which deal with the white matter changes. These differences should be considered on the stages of planning and evaluation of the results.

Aims: Evaluation of the gender differences in the white matter pathways in healthy subjects.

Methods: 21 women and 20 men were enrolled in the study. All the subjects underwent MR-tractography, then the anatomic connectome was composed and the differences were evaluated using the tracts quantitative anisotropy (QA) evaluation.

Results: The gender differences were found in the white matter pathways with the prevalence of quantitative anisotropy in women, observed in a larger number of tracts than in those of men. QA was prevalent in a lot of fascicli that form major pathways in both groups: corpus callosum, dominant arcuate fasciclus, inferior fronto-occipital, inferior and superior right longitudinal pathways.

Conclusions: The white matter pathways in males and females are different not only within the major tracts but also for small fascicli that form tracts.

About the authors

Ilya L. Gubskiy

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Author for correspondence.
Email: gubskiy.ilya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1726-6801
SPIN-code: 9181-3091
Scopus Author ID: 57214892235
ResearcherId: V-4376-2017

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

Ivan S. Gumin

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Email: ivangumin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2360-3261
SPIN-code: 3454-2665

MD

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

Maxim A. Shorikov

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Email: mshorikov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3813-5608
SPIN-code: 1393-1437

MD

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

Mikhail M. Beregov

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Email: mik.beregov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1899-8131
SPIN-code: 2559-0307

MD

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

Leonid V. Gubsky

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Email: gubskii@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7423-1229

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

Vladimir G. Lelyuk

Federal Center for Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

Email: V.G.Lelyuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9690-8325
SPIN-code: 1066-9840

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, 117342, Moscow, Ostrovityanova Street, 1, Building 10

References

  1. Cahill L. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Rev Neuroscience. 2006;7(6):477–484. doi: 10.1038/nrn1909
  2. Rutter M, Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: Unifying issues and research strategies. J Child Psychology Psychiatry Allied Disciplines. 2003;44(8):1092–1115. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00194
  3. Mazure CM, Swendsen J. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(5):451–452. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00067-3
  4. Hyde JS. Gender similarities and differences. Annual Rev Psychol. 2014;65:373–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
  5. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Rev General Psychol. 2004;8(4):291–322. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
  6. Ritchie SJ, Cох SR, Shen X, et al. Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5216 UK biobank participants. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(8):2959–2975. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy109
  7. Van den Heuvel MP, de Reus MA, Barrett LF, et al. Comparison of diffusion tractography and tract-tracing measures of connectivity strength in rhesus macaque connectome. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(8):3064–3075. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22828
  8. Yeh FC, Wedeen VJ, Tseng WY. Generalized q-sampling imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(9):1626–1635. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2045126
  9. Yeh FC, Tseng WY. NTU-90: A high angular resolution brain atlas constructed by q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction. Neuroimage. 2011;58(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.021
  10. Yeh FC, Verstynen TD, Wang Y, et al. Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080713
  11. Yeh FC, Panesar S, Barrios J, et al. Automatic Removal of False Connections in Diffusion MRI Tractography Using Topology-Informed Pruning (TIP). Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16(1):52–58. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0663-y
  12. Yeh FC, Panesar S, Fernandes D, et al. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage. 2018;178:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.027
  13. Jung M, Mody M, Fujioka T, et al. Sex differences in white matter pathways related to language ability. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:898. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00898
  14. Kanaan RA, Allin M, Picchioni M, et al. Gender differences in white matter microstructure. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038272
  15. Westerhausen R, Walter C, Kreude F, et al. The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: A diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. 2003;351(2):99–102. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.07.011
  16. Shin YW, Kim DJ, Ha TH, et al. Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroreport. 2005;16(8):795–798. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200505310-00003
  17. Menzler K, Belke M, Wehrmann E, et al. Men and women are different: Diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum. Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2557–2562. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.029
  18. Lee CE, Danielian LE, Thomasson D, Baker EH. Normal regional fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient of the brain measured on a 3T MR scanner. Neuroradiology. 2009; 51(1):3–9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0441-3
  19. Wu YC, Field AS, Whalen PJ, Alexander AL. Age- and gender-related changes in the normal human brain using hybrid diffusion imaging (HYDI). Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):1840–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.067
  20. Oh JS, Song IC, Lee JS, et al. Tractography-guided statistics (TGIS) in diffusion tensor imaging for the detection of gender difference of fiber integrity in the midsagittal and parasagittal corpora callosa. Neuroimage. 2007;36(3):606–616. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.020
  21. Inano S, Takao H, Hayashi N, et al. Effects of age and gender on white matter integrity. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(11):2103–2109. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2785

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. MR tomograms (а) and 3D reconstructions (б) of the brain in various projections with the marked pathways, characterized by a higher index of quantitative anisotropy (QA), in men. The spatial direction of the revealed tracts is highlighted in color in panel (б).

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. MR tomograms (a) and 3D reconstructions (б) of the brain in various projections with the marked pathways, characterized by a higher index of quantitative anisotropy (QA), in women. The spatial direction of the revealed tracts is highlighted in color in panel (б).

Download (1MB)
4. Fig. 3. 3D reconstructions of the brain and pathways with the highest index of quantitative anisotropy (QA), in men (red) and women (blue).

Download (1MB)
5. Fig. 4. 3D visualization of the pathways of the corpus callosum with the highest index of quantitative anisotropy (QA), in men (red) and women (blue). The tracts prevailing for the two sexes, are displayed, which pass through different parts and fasciclе of the corpus callosum.

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Gubskiy I.L., Gumin I.S., Shorikov M.A., Beregov M.M., Gubsky L.V., Lelyuk V.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies