Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Rate in Different Clinical Groups: Coronary Artery Disease and Age Matter
- 作者: Gorev M.V.1, Urazovskaya I.L.2
-
隶属关系:
- Family Doctor JSC
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- 期: 卷 3, 编号 1 (2023)
- 页面: 31-40
- 栏目: Original Research
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/cardar/article/view/132566
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/cardar305725
- ID: 132566
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an established method for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Up to 20% of patients with AF develop coronary artery disease (CAD) as a secondary diagnosis. The data on whether the CAD affects the efficacy of AF ablation is contrary, while arterial hypertension is a known risk factor for AF as well as for AF recurrence after the CA.
AIM: We conducted this research to assess the AF recurrence rate and its risk factors after the primary catheter AF ablation procedure in the different clinical groups including IdiopathicAF, AF concomitant to arterial hypertension (HTN) and AF concomitant to CAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent 451 PVI procedures performed since January 2016 to December 2017 were screened for AH, CAD and other structural heart disease. Among them 153 pts were selected for the subsequent analysis and divided into 3 groups — IdiopathicAF, AF + AH, AF + CAD.
RESULTS: The presence of CAD (r = 0.313, p < 0.001), age (r = 0.224, p = 0.008), CHA2DS2-VASc score (r = 0.279, p = 0.001), history of MI (r = 0.240, p = 0.004), LA size (r = 0.204, p = 0.018) were correlated with the recurrence rate. In the AF + CAD group patients older than 65 years demonstrated dramatically lower AF-free survival rate (37.5%) in comparison to younger CAD population (75%, log-rank p < 0.001) as well as to younger and older non-CAD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CAD should always attract the attention of physicians before considering the AF ablation as an option to treatment. Elderly CAD patients have the lowest ablation efficacy and the best strategy for this group (more extensive primary ablation or conversion to the permanent AF) needs to be studied.
作者简介
Maxim Gorev
Family Doctor JSC
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: drgorevmv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1300-4986
SPIN 代码: 3572-2389
Arrhythmologist
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowIrina Urazovskaya
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: langelova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4165-4599
SPIN 代码: 9263-4316
Senior Laboratory Assistant
俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg参考
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ) The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
- Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation (CABANA) Trial: study rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2018;199:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.015
- Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14): 1305–1316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019422
- Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–1151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
- Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):599–609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
- Winkle RA, Jarman JWE, Hardwin Mead R, et al. Predicting atrial fibrillation ablation outcome: The CAAP-AF score. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(11):2119–2125. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.018
- Kornej J, Hindricks G, Arya A, et al. Presence and extent of coronary artery disease as predictor for AF recurrences after catheter ablation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2015;181:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.039
- Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewikz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159–2219. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht151
- Liu L, Zhao D, Zhang J, et al. Impact of stable coronary artery disease on the efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the atrial fibrillation. Am J Med Sci. 2019;358(3):204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.06.004
- Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Patrawala RA. Long-term results of atrial fibrillation ablation: The importance of all initial ablation failures undergoing a repeat ablation. Am Heart J. 2011;162(1): 193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.013
- Jansen HJ, Moghtadaei M, Makasey M, et al. Atrial structure, function and arrhythmogenesis in aged and frail mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44336. doi: 10.1038/srep44336
- Pandit SV, Jalife J. Aging and AF research: where we are and where we should go. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(2):186–187. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.011
- Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: A global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129(8):837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119
- Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. The impact of age on 5-year outcomes after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(2):141–146. doi: 10.1111/jce.12849
补充文件
