Students opinion about E-Learning in a Master course in Interventional Radiology: a survey among participants

Capa

Citar

Resumo

AIM: To evaluate the opinion of students about Tele-education in a post-graduate University Master in Interventional Radiology.

METHODS: The core curriculum of the Master is divided into 3 e-Learning modules and 2 e-Learning plus Hands-on Training modules. E-Learning is delivered through a webinar platform that allows to perform a synchronous training providing real-time lectures that are recorded for streaming on a dedicated website. The Hands-on Training is provided on site, assisting interventional radiologists in interventional procedures on patients. An online survey of 12 questions has been prepared to determine the quality of training. Students indicated their level of agreement regarding the impact of eLearning and Hands on Training using a 5-point scale. The mean score of the level of agreement was calculated.

RESULTS: The series include 16 participants. The 62.5% work in a public non-academic Hospital and 80% have already performed >300 interventional procedures as primary operator.

The main advantage of the eLearning module was considered the capability to facilitate the attendance to lectures (68.8%) followed by the low cost training (18.8%), with a good agreement between participants. No students scored the statements as less than 3. The Master fulfilled the learning expectations in 81.3% of cases with a good agreement between participants.

CONCLUSIONS: The participants were highly satisfied and would recommend the Master to other colleagues. The blended type of education of our Master received high appreciation and could be a model to be follow in the future, also in IR.

Sobre autores

Emanuele Neri

University of Pisa

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: emanuele.neri@med.unipi.it
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7950-4559
https://people.unipi.it/emanuele_neri/

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor, Department of Translational Research

Itália, Lungarno Pacinotti, 43, 56126, Pisa, PI

Laura Crocetti

Pisa University Hospital

Email: laura.crocetti@med.unipi.it
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8160-0483

MD, Associate professor

Itália, Pisa

Giulia Lorenzoni

Pisa University Hospital

Email: giulia.lorenzoni@unipd.it
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1771-4686

PhD Student

Itália, Pisa

Roberto Cioni

Pisa University Hospital

Email: c.cioni@ao-pisa.toscana.it
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9425-0286
Itália, Pisa

Adrian Brady

Mercy University Hospital, Cork & University College

Email: adrianbrady@me.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3473-0282

MD, Clinical Senior Lecturer

Irlanda, Cork

Davide Caramella

University of Pisa

Email: davide.caramella@unipi.it
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9951-2916

MD, Professor

Itália, Pisa

Bibliografia

  1. Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes. Medical Specialties. UEMS; 2009. Accessed 24 Jan 2017.Available from: https://www.uems.eu/about-us/medical-specialties.
  2. Mahnken AH, Bücker A, Hohl C, Berlis A. White Paper: curriculum in interventional radiology. Fortschr Rontgenstr. 2017;189(4):309–311. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-104773
  3. Tsetis D, Uberoi R, Fanelli F, et al. The Provision of Interventional Radiology Services in Europe: CIRSE Recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(4):500–506. doi: 10.1007/s00270-016-1299-0
  4. Lee MJ, Belli AM, Brountzos E, et al. Specialty status for interventional radiology: the time is now. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(4):862. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0903-4
  5. Siragusa DA, Cardella JF, Hieb RA, et al. Requirements for Training in Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(11):1609–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.08.002
  6. Xiberta P, Boada I. A new e-learning platform for radiology education (RadEd). Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;126:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.022
  7. Pinto A, Brunese L, Pinto F, et al. E-learning and education in radiology. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(3):368–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.029
  8. Rösch J. Tele-education in Interventional Radiology. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2001;24(5):295–296. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0020-z
  9. U.S. Department of Education. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC; 2010. Accessed 3 Jan 2017. Available from: https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
  10. Sparacia G, Cannizzaro F, D’Alessandro DM, et al. Initial experiences in radiology e-learning. Radiographics. 2007;27(2):573–581. doi: 10.1148/rg.272065077
  11. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–212. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
  12. Cook DA. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med. 2007;7(1):37–42. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-1-37
  13. Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Bauersachs A, et al. Acceptance of technology-enhanced learning for a theoretical radiological science course: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-18
  14. Santos GN, Leite AF, Figueiredo PT, et al. Effectiveness of e-learning in oral radiology education: a systematic review. J Dent EDuc. 2016;80(9):1126–1139.
  15. Ellaway R. E-learning: Is the revolution over? Medical Teacher. 2011;33(4):297–302. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550968

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Neri E., Crocetti L., Lorenzoni G., Cioni R., Brady A., Caramella D., 2021

Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies