All-Russian rating of radiology departments: 2020 competition results

Cover Image

Cite item

Abstract

The issues of quality medical care management and organization of the work of the department of radiation diagnostics are always relevant and require constant monitoring and analytical expertise. Since 2018, the Moscow regional branch of the Russian Society of Radiologists and Radiologists (MRO PORR) has been conducting an independent assessment of the departments of radiation diagnostics in all the regions of Russia. The rating aimed to identify industry leaders and spread the best practices throughout the country. The survey results identified the positive trends in the development of diagnostic care services throughout the country and critical points that affect the quality of work of medical organizations.

This study presents an analysis of the functioning of 123 departments of radiation diagnostics in 2020. After meeting the inclusion criteria, a list of 163 medical organizations in 15 cities of 7 federal districts was formed. The evaluation procedure was divided into three stages. The first stage consisted of an online survey, wherein each of the participating organizations was asked to answer questions about the department’s work arrangement, equipment, list, and features of performing diagnostic tests, as well as working with patients. The second stage consisted of a clinical and technical audit of a set of anonymized studies with conclusions. Special attention was paid to technical audits since several medical organizations violated the methodology of conducting research. The third stage included checking the information about medical organizations in open sources. During the first and second stages, points were awarded, based on which the finalists, leaders, and rating winners were selected.

According to the evaluation results of all stages,31 organizations reached the final stage,6 were in the group of leaders, and 5 were winners, whereas 45% of the finalists belonged to the Central Federal District. Greater interest was found in the auditing work in municipal and private medical institutions than in departmental and federal ones. Some database has been collected, in addition to the list of winners, which may represent a cross-section of the state of the radiation diagnostics service in the Russian Federation.

Conducting such competitions is primarily aimed at improving the quality and safety of X-ray examinations. The methodology of the competition is improved every year.

About the authors

Dmitriy S. Semenov

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: d.semenov@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4293-2514
SPIN-code: 2278-7290
Scopus Author ID: 57213154475
ResearcherId: P-5228-2017

Researcher of the Department of Innovative Technologies

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

Olga Y. Panina

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of Moscow Health Care Department

Email: olgayurpanina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8684-775X
SPIN-code: 5504-8136
ResearcherId: AAG-6447-2020

младший научный сотрудник отдела инновационных технологий

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

Anna N. Khoruzhaya

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: a.khoruzhaya@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4857-5404
SPIN-code: 7948-6427
ResearcherId: AAG-5184-2020

младший научный сотрудник отдела инновационных технологий

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

Nikita D. Kudryavtsev

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: n.kudryavtsev@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4203-0630
SPIN-code: 1125-8637
Scopus Author ID: 57213148303
ResearcherId: AAG-1869-2020

младший научный сотрудник отдела инновационных технологий

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

Yuriy A. Vasilev

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department; City Clinical Oncological Hospital No. 1 of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: dr.vasilev@me.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0208-5218
SPIN-code: 4458-5608

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051; Moscow

Natalya V. Ledikhova

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: n.ledikhova@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1446-424X
SPIN-code: 6907-5936

заместитель директора по медицинской части

Russian Federation, 127051, Москва, ул. Петровка, д. 24, стр. 1

Igor M. Shulkin

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Email: i.shulkin@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7613-5273
SPIN-code: 5266-0618

заведующий центром по внедрению медицинских технологий - врач-рентгенолог
Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

Sergey P. Morozov

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Author for correspondence.
Email: morozov@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6545-6170
SPIN-code: 8542-1720
Scopus Author ID: 57200964938
ResearcherId: T-9163-2017

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, 24, build. 1, Petrovka st., Moscow,127051

References

  1. The ESR Audit Tool (Esperanto): genesis, contents and pilot. Insights Imaging. 2018;9(6):899–903. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0651-0
  2. Morozov SP, Gabai PG, Vladzimirsky AV, et al. Fundamentals of medical imaging management: a tutorial. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. 432 p. (In Russ).
  3. Tyurin IE. Radiation diagnostics in the Russian Federation in 2016. Bulletin Roentgenol Radiol. 2017;98(4):219–226. (In Russ).
  4. Morozov SP, Kuzmina ES, Ledikhova NV, et al. Mobilizing the academic and practical potential of diagnostic radiology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Moscow. Digital Diagnostics. 2020;1(1):5–12. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/DD51043
  5. Smyshlyaev AV, Melnikov YY, Shakhabov IV. Telemedicine technologies as a tool for increasing the availability of medical care for the population at the present stage: key problems and development prospects. Chief Physician. 2020;5:44–54. (In Russ). doi: 10.33920/med-03-2005-05
  6. Rasskazova EA, Rozhkova NI. Screening for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Res Practice Med. 2014;1(1):45–51. (In Russ).
  7. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al. Lung cancer screening: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(2):240–265. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0022
  8. Patient Safety in Medical Imaging: a joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0721-y
  9. Vodovatov AV, Golikov VY, Kalnitsky SA, et al. Evaluation of levels of exposure of adult patients from common radiographic examinations in the Russian Federation in 2009–2014. Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(3):66–75. (In Russ). doi: 10.21514/1998-42602017-10-3-66-75
  10. Morozov SP, Vladzimirsky AV, Ledikhova NV, Kuzmina ES. Expert telemedicine consulting in the service of radiological diagnostics of the city of Moscow. Vrach Information Technology. 2018;(S1):48–57. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Availability of same-day X-ray examinations.

Download (106KB)
3. Fig. 2. Appointments in radiology departments (RDs) on weekends.

Download (94KB)
4. Fig. 3. Characteristics of second opinion requests in RDs: а, general information on its availability; b, data on modalities for which specialists most commonly request a “second opinion.” Most frequently (94%), further CT scan examination is required.

Download (147KB)
5. Fig. 4. Prevalence of CT scans performed in the RDs of the rating participants.

Download (106KB)
6. Fig. 5. Transducers of ultrasound diagnostic devices.

Download (117KB)
7. Fig. 6. Availability of specialized X-ray examinations.

Download (84KB)
8. Fig. 7. Availability of mammographic examinations.

Download (123KB)
9. Fig. 8. Number of visitors per day in the top ten RDs based on the rating.

Download (84KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Semenov D.S., Panina O.Y., Khoruzhaya A.N., Kudryavtsev N.D., Vasilev Y.A., Ledikhova N.V., Shulkin I.M., Morozov S.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies