Advantages and disadvantages of the iCare tonometer: prospects for medical use

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmic tonometers are instruments used for the measurement of intraocular pressure in the diagnosis and monitoring of conditions in which the level of intraocular pressure deviates from the individual norm. One such tonometer is the iCare, which operates on the rebound principle [1]. A small rod is directed towards the cornea, the nature of its movement is analyzed, and the device calculates the intraocular pressure [1, 2]. The use of rebound technology for the advancement of a portable eye tonometer will facilitate the development of a convenient, accurate, and reliable device for the measurement of intraocular pressure.

AIM: The aim of this study is to identify the principal advantages and disadvantages of the iCare ophthalmic tonometer, with a view to facilitating the further development of a Russian analogue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching for relevant publications in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and eLibrary databases from 2005 to 2023. The search terms used were “rebound tonometry”, “iCare tonometry”, and “intraocular pressure”. A total of 17 scientific articles were analyzed.

RESULTS: The main advantages of the iCare tonometer are highlighted:

  • No patient discomfort due to minimal corneal contact time, no anesthesia required [1, 2];
  • The accuracy of the indicators measured by the iCare tonometer is comparable to the gold standard of intraocular pressure measurement, the Goldmann tonometer [3, 4, 6];
  • Portability and compactness of the tonometer, ability to measure pressure in a sitting or lying position [1, 2];
  • Intraocular pressure measurement takes little time [1, 16, 17];
  • The use of a disposable handpiece minimizes the risk of infectious disease transmission [16];
  • Possibility to measure intraocular pressure in eyes with various pathologies, such as glaucoma, keratoconus [9, 10], post-refractive surgery [11] and keratoplasty [8, 12, 13], vitreous cavity tamponade with silicone [14];
  • The iCare tonometer does not require regular maintenance and calibration, is easy to use, and can be used by other professionals and patients at home [16, 17].

Disadvantages include:

  • High cost compared to other tonometers, requiring regular purchase of disposable probes [15, 17];
  • The limited use of the iCare tonometer in patients with corneal abnormalities, namely patients with an abnormal corneal resistance factor or corneal hysteresis [5, 7].

CONCLUSIONS: The iCare tonometer offers a number of advantages, including patient safety and comfort during the examination, accuracy, portability, quick results, and the ability to be used on healthy eyes as well as on eyes with various diseases or after surgery. However, it also has some limitations when used in certain clinical cases, as well as a high cost. Despite these limitations, the iCare tonometer remains a valuable tool for measuring intraocular pressure. Therefore, we propose to use the rebound technology employed in the iCare tonometer to develop a domestic portable tonometer.

About the authors

Mariya A. Telelyasova

Gatchina Clinical Interdistrict Hospital

Email: telelyasova@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 4127-1854
Russian Federation, Gatchina

Anastasiia O. Ukina

Gatchina Clinical Interdistrict Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: anastasiukina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6752-9499
Russian Federation, Gatchina

References

  1. Cervino A. Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure. The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2006;90(12):1444. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.102970
  2. Rödter TH, Knippschild S, Baulig C, Krummenauer F. Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare® PRO–based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;30(2):245–252. doi: 10.1177/1120672119866067
  3. Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2008;246:875–879. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0758-3
  4. Schlote T, Landenberger H. Augeninnendruckmessung mit dem transpalpebralen Tonometer TGDc-01 „PRA” im Vergleich zur Applanationstonometrie nach Goldmann bei Glaukompatienten. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 2005;222(2):123–131. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857881
  5. Luebke J, Bryniok L, Neuburger M, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry. International ophthalmology. 2019;39:2517–2521. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01098-5
  6. Sachdeva R, Iordanous Y, Lin T. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by iCare tonometers and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023;58(5):426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.06.002
  7. Morales-Fernandez L, Saenz-Frances F, Pérez-García P, et al. Effects of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometry (Icare200) and applanation tonometry (Perkins) readings in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma. 2022;31(3):183–190. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001913
  8. Dumitrescu OM, Istrate S, Macovei ML, Gheorghe AG. Intraocular pressure measurement after penetrating keratoplasty. Diagnostics. 2022;12(2):234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020234
  9. Mendez-Hernandez C, Arribas-Pardo P, Cuiña-Sardiña R, et al. Measuring intraocular pressure in patients with keratoconus with and without intrastromal corneal ring segments. Journal of Glaucoma. 2017;26(1):71–76. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000549
  10. Arribas-Pardo P, Mendez-Hernandez C, Cuiña-Sardiña R, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Garcia-Feijoo J. Tonometry after intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. Optometry and Vision Science. 2017;94(10):986–992. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001120
  11. Gómez-Gómez A, Talens-Estarelles C, Alcocer-Yuste P, Nieto JC. Reliability of iCare ic100 rebound tonometry and agreement with Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and post-myopic LASIK patients. Journal of Glaucoma. 2021;30(8):634–642. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001878
  12. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, et al. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye. 2011;25(5):642–650. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.60
  13. Achiron A, Blumenfeld O, Avizemer H, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study. Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie. 2016;39(10):822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2016.09.009
  14. Grewal DS, Stinnett SS, Folgar FA, et al. A comparative study of rebound tonometry with Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry following vitreoretinal surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;161:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.022
  15. Handzel DM, Ben Abdallah C, Habie H, Alani A, Sekundo W. Rebound-Tonometrie mit sterilisierten Sonden. Die Ophthalmologie. 2023;120(11):1122–1126. doi: 10.1007/s00347-023-01886-6
  16. Petersen CA, Chen A, Chen PP. How should we measure intraocular pressure in the era of coronavirus disease 2019? Balancing infectious risk, cleaning requirements, and accuracy. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2022;33(2):67. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000831
  17. Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2018;12:1245–1253. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S163092

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies