Problems of personnel irradiation in modern medical technologies

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of radiation sources in medical practice (cardio-endovascular surgery, endoscopy, traumatology, urology, neurosurgery, dentistry, and radioisotope diagnostics departments) leads to irradiation of the lens of the eye and the skin of the hands. The introduction of new recommendations by the IAEA to reduce the limit of the annual equivalent dose to the lens (20 mSv) has led to an inaccurate dose assessment based on the effective dose.

AIM: To analyze approaches and assess equivalent doses of irradiation of the lens of the eye and skin of the hands of medical personnel during various diagnostic studies under the influence of X-rays and radiopharmaceuticals studies and to compare the results obtained with previously published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermo-luminescent dosimetry was used. Dose assessment was performed by cardio-endovascular surgery, endoscopy, isotope diagnostics, dentistry, and urology personnel.

RESULTS: The estimated annual equivalent doses to the lens of the eye for doctors of cardio-endovascular surgery departments, in most cases, ranging 35–90 mSv, 6–19 mSv for the average medical staff (in some cases, the doctor [≤225 mSv] and the nurse [≤180 mSv]) and 4.5–9 mSv for the staff of the department of radioisotope diagnostics. The annual calculated equivalent doses to the skin of the hands for cardio-endovascular surgery personnel were 17–100 and 24–220 mSv for the staff working with radiopharmaceuticals. It is shown that the use of an estimate of the average dose per operation by cardio-endovascular surgery doctors, as a rule, inevitably leads to an excess of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye after a certain number of operations.

CONCLUSION: When a certain number of operations are exceeded (100–200), equivalent doses to the eye’s lens in cardio-endovascular surgery doctors above 20 mSv per year can be formed. At current radiation levels, a lesion of the eye’s lens was found in a cardio-endovascular surgery doctor. The results indicate the need for further dosimetric measurements and epidemiological studies, based on which recommendations for radiation protection of the eye’s lens and the skin of the hands of medical personnel working in low-intensity, scattered, gamma X-ray radiation can be developed.

About the authors

Sergey A. Ryzhkin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Kazan State Medical University

Email: rsa777@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2595-353X
SPIN-code: 5955-5712
Russian Federation, Moscow; Kazan

Yuliya V. Druzhinina

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: druzhininaYV2@zdrav.mos.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3230-3722
SPIN-code: 1973-2848
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Zoya A. Lantukh

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: LantukhZA@zdrav.mos.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6623-9610
SPIN-code: 5486-6496
Russian Federation, Moscow

Ilya V. Soldatov

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: SoldatovIV2@zdrav.mos.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4867-0746
SPIN-code: 4065-6048
Russian Federation, Moscow

Viktor N. Lesnyak

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies

Email: Iesnyak_kb83@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2739-0649
SPIN-code: 5483-3113
Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry P. Lebedev

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies

Email: lebedevdp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1551-3127
SPIN-code: 4770-5722
Russian Federation, Moscow

Denis N. Samochatov

City Clinical Hospital No. 67 named after L.A. Vorokhobov

Email: dnsamochatov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5230-2006
SPIN-code: 3340-2715
Russian Federation, Moscow

Maria P. Semenova

State Research Center ― Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center

Email: mps-fmbc@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0904-0415
SPIN-code: 7205-0062
Russian Federation, Moscow

Vitaliy А. Sukhov

The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: cyxowv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2993-0108
Russian Federation, Moscow

Sergey E. Okhrimenko

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: ooniii@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8282-1798
SPIN-code: 8712-2710
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Ivanov SI, Loginova SV, Akopova NA, et al. Problems of dosimetry of the eye lens. Med Radiol Radiation Safety. 2014;59(4):67–72. (In Russ).
  2. International Commission on Radiological Protection [Internet]. ICRP, 1996. Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. ICRP Publication 74. Ann. ICRP 26 (3-4). Available from: https://icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP+Publication+74. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency [Internet]. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. Interim edition. IAEA; 2011. 329 p.
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency [Internet]. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. No. GSR Part 3. Vienna, IAEA; 2015. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/publications/8930/radiation-protection-and-safety-of-radiation-sources-international-basic-safety-standards. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection [Internet]. CRP, 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4). Available from: https://icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  6. International Commission on Radiological Protection [Internet]. ICRP statement on tissue reactions. Ref. 4825-3093-1464, April 21, 2011. Available from: https://icrp.org/docs/2011%20Seoul.pdf. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  7. International Commission on Radiological Protection [Internet]. Implications for occupational radiation protection of the new dose limit for the lens of the eye. Interim guidance for use and comment. Draft 1. ICRP; 2013. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/publications/10628/implications-for-occupational-radiation-protection-of-the-new-dose-limit-for-the-lens-of-the-eye. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection [Internet]. ICRP, 2012 ICRP statement on tissue reactions / early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs: threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. ICRP Publication 118. Ann. ICRP 41(1/2). Available from: https://icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20118. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  9. UNSCEAR 2010 Report [Internet]. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 2010. Summary of low-dose radiation effects on health. United Nations, New York; 2011. Available from: https://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2010/UNSCEAR_2010_Report_M.pdf. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  10. Karpov NA, Okhrimenko SE, Ivanov SI, et al. Dose in the lens of the eye. In: All-Russian conference with international participation dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth V.A. Kuhtina: Collection of materials, 3–4 April. Cheboksary, 2014. P. 235–236. (In Russ).
  11. Nuclear Energy Agency [Internet]. NEA Expert Group on the Dose Limit for the lens of the eye launches survey. nuclear energy agency [cite 2020 April 8]. Available from: https://oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_40031/nea-expert-group-on-the-dose-limit-for-the-lens-of-the-eye-launches-survey. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  12. Okhrimenko SE, Korenkov IP, Shandala NK, et al. Dose assessment to the lens of the eye and skin of the personnel in advanced medical technologies. Med Radiol Radiation Safety. 2022;67(1):44–49. (In Russ).
  13. Okhrimenko SE, Osipov AN, Korenkov IP, et al. Assessment of doses of irradiation of the skin of the hands in cardioendovascular surgery and the number of double-strand DNA breaks in the culture of skin fibroblasts on the phantom of the hands. In: Collection of abstracts of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation “Radiation hygiene and continuing professional education: New challenges and ways of development” dedicated to the 65th anniversary of the Department of Radiation Hygiene and Radiation Safety named after Academician F.G. Krotkov”, October 27, 2022. Moscow; 2022. Р. 64–68. (In Russ).
  14. Okhrimenko SE, Korenkov IP, Prokhorov NI, et al. Radiation-hygienic assessment of modern medical technologies. Hygiene Sanitation. 2020;99(9):939–946. (In Russ). doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-9-939-946
  15. Shleenkova EN, Bazhin SY, Kaidanovsky GN, et al. The necessity of regular dose monitoring for the eye lens of the staff working with radiopharmaceuticals. Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(3):101–111. (In Russ). doi: 10.21514/1998-426X-2021-14-3-101-111
  16. Wrzesień M. 18F-FDG production procedures as a source of eye lens exposure to radiation. J Radiol. 2018;(38):382–393. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aaa287
  17. Wrzesień M. The effect of work system on the hand exposure of workers in 18F-FDG production centers. Australasian Physical Engineering Sciences Med. 2018;41(2):541–548. doi: 10.1007/s13246-018-0644-9
  18. Okhrimenko SE, Korenkov IP, Yashkina EI, et al. Irradiation of the skin of the hands in interventional cardiac surgery (report). In: III National Congress with international participation “Sysin readings”, November 16–18, 2022. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ).
  19. McParland BJ, Nosil J, Barry B. A survey of radiation exposure received by the staff at two cardiac catherization laboratories. Br J Radiol. 1990;63(755):885–888. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-755-885
  20. Steffanino G, Rossetti V, Rubichini F, et al. Short communication: Staff dose reduction during coronary angiography using low framing speed. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(825):860–864. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-825-860
  21. Li IB, Kai M, Takano K, et al. Occupational exposure in pediatric cardiac cauterization. Health Phis. 1995;69(2):261–264. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199508000-00011
  22. Medeiros RD, Mennucci TA. [Evolution of X-ray exposure dosage during coronary cineangiolography. (In Portuguese)] Arg Bras Cardiol. 1990;55(1):31–33.
  23. Karppinen J, Parviainen T, Servomaa A, Komppa T. Radiation risk and exposure of radiologists and patients during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1995;57(1-4):481–484.
  24. David EF, Andrew K, Christopher O, Sanjog P. The risk of radiation exposure to the eyes of the interventional pain. Physician Radiol Res Practice. 2011;2011:609537. doi: 10.1155/2011/609537
  25. Vecchia ED, Modenese A, Loney T. Risk of cataract in health care workers exposed to ionizing radiation: A systematic review. Med Lav. 2020;111(4):269–284. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v111i4.9045
  26. Morcillo AB, Alejo L, Huerga C, et al. Occupational doses to the eye lens in pediatric and adult noncardiac interventional radiology procedures. Med Physics. 2021;48(4):1956–1966. doi: 10.1002/mp.14753
  27. Merrachi NA, Bouchard-Bellavance R, Perreault P. Eye lens dosimetry in interventional radiology: Assessment with dedicated Hp(3) dosimeters. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(2):317–323. doi: 10.1177/0846537120911755
  28. Thrapsanioti Z, Askounis P, Datseris I, et al. Eye lens radiation exposure in Greek interventional cardiology article. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2017;175(3):344–356. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw356
  29. Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Kałużny P, Piernik G. Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and lens opacity in interventional cardiologists. Int J Occupational Med Environmental Health. 2019;32(5):663–675. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01456
  30. Kaydanovsky GN, Shleenkova EN. On problems of the lens ofthe eye radiation dose monitoring. Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(3):75–80. (In Russ). doi: 10.21514/1998-426Х-2016-9-3-75-80
  31. Shleenkova EN, Golikov VY, Kaidanovsky GN, et al. Results of eye lens doses control of medical personnel in St. Petersburg. Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(4):29–36. (In Russ). doi: 10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-4-29-36
  32. UPCommons. Global access to UPC knowledge [Internet]. Ginjaume M, Carnicer A. Oramed: Optimization of radiation protection of medical staff. 2012. EURADOS Report 2012-02. Available from: https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/17229. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  33. Vanhavere F, Carinou E, Domienik JL, et al. Measurements of eye lens doses in interventional radiology and cardiology: Final results of the ORAMED project. Radiation Measurements. 2011;46(11):1243–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.013
  34. EUR-Lex [Internet]. Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj. Accessed: 15.04.2023.
  35. Azizova TV, Hamada N, Grigorieva ES, Bragin EV. Risk of various types of cataracts in the cohort of workers exposed to occupational chronic radiation. Med Radiology Radiation Safety. 2020;65(4):48–57. (In Russ). doi: 10.12737/1024-6177-2020-65-4-48-57
  36. Mikryukova LD, Krestinina LY, Epiphanova SB. A study of layered lens change in the process of cataract formation in persons exposed to radiation as a result of radiation accidents in the Southern Urals. Radiation Hygiene. 2018;11(4):51–63. (In Russ). doi: 10.21514/1998-426Х-2018-11-4-51-63
  37. Ryzhkin SA, Slesareva AN, Galeeva GZ, Ivanov SI. Clinical examination of the eyes functional status and assessment of equivalent dose to eye lens in medical staff performing endovascular interventions under X-ray guidance. Radiation Risks. 2017;26(3):90–99. (In Russ). doi: 10.21870/0131-3878-2017-26-3-90-99
  38. Galeeva GZ, Ryzhkin SA, Sergeeva SU. The effect of ionizing radiation on a person and the organ of vision. Practical Med. 2016; 99(7): 37–41. (In Russ).
  39. Ryzhkin SA, Galeeva GZ, Sergeeva SU. Radiation cataract in the light of modern research achievements in ophthalmology (review). Bulletin Medical Institute REAVIZ: Rehabilitation Doctor Health. 2016;24(4):37–42. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies