The worldview of Chinese dynasties: cultural continuity and rupture in the reign names of emperors

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This paper continues the research of the symbolic aspect of Chinese history through study of the reign names (nianhao) of the monarchs. The current part of the research is focused mainly on the question of the cultural continuity of the worldview in different epochs of Chinese state development. This also implicates questioning the consistency of Chinese history and its self-perception over the course of two millennia. The proposed solution of the problem in question consists in classifying reign names into a small set of groups and analyzing the historical change in proportions of these groups. The research shows that, despite the fact, that different regional models of the reign names’ systems arose through the history of China, still the tradition itself retained consistency even in the eras of nomadic conquest. It is also shown, that the discontinuity of the said tradition was caused by no external force, but arose through its own evolution in the deep layers of Chinese culture.

About the authors

Dega V. Deopik

Institute of Asian and African Studies of Moscow State University; Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: d.v.deopik@inbox.ru

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Bogdan K. Ganshin

Institute of Asian and African Studies of Moscow State University; Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: bganshin@gmail.com

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Deopik DV, Ganshin BK. Reign Symbols as a Source on Chinese History (Part 1). China: Society and Culture. 2022;1(1):19–36.
  2. Wang Yu-ch’uan. An Outline of The Central Government of The Former Han Dynasty. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 1949;12(1/2):134–187. doi: 10.2307/2718206
  3. Yang CK. Religion in Chinese Society: A Study of Contemporary Functions of Religion and Some of Their Historical Factors. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961.
  4. Schafer, E.H. Chinese Reign-Names – Words or Nonsense Syllables? Wennti Papers. 1952;3:33–40. doi: 10.1353/tan.1990.0001
  5. Schafer EH. Non-translation and Functional Translation: Two Sinological Maladies. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1954;13(3):251–260. doi: 10.2307/2942278
  6. Wright MC. What’s in a Reign Name: The Uses of History and Philology. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1958;18(1):103–106. doi: 10.2307/2941289
  7. Martynov AS. Era (Reign) Names of Chinese Emperors (Nian Hao). Proceedings of the 12th science conference “Written Monuments and Problems of the History of Culture of the East”. Мoscow; 1977. P:78–84. (In Russ.)
  8. Sima Qian. Istoricheskie zapiski (Shi ji). Vyatkin AR, Taskin VS, trans., comment. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2003;2. 567 p. P:277 (In Russ.)
  9. Rybakov VM. The T’ang Bureaucracy. Pt 1. Genesis and Structure. Saint Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie; 2009. 512 p. P:19–62. (In Russ.)
  10. Zhang Junfei. Cong nianhao kan shiliu guo zhengquan zhi wenhua yu zhengzhi quxiang [Certain political and cultural tendencies of the “Sixtheen barbarian states” within the context of reign symbols]. Jiangsu jiaoyuxuebao. 2007;(1). (In Chinese)
  11. History of China from the Earliest Times till XXI Century: In 10 volumes. Vol. III. Three Kingdoms, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, Sui, Tang, Moscow: Nauka; 2014. (In Russ.)
  12. Wechsler HJ. Offerings of Jade and Silks: Ritual and Symbol in the Legitimation of the T’ang Dynasty. New Haven (Conn.): Yale University Press; 1985.
  13. Rothschild NH. An Inquiry into Reign Era Changes under Wu Zhao, China’s Only Female Emperor. Early Medieval China. 2006;(1):123–149.
  14. Ma Xue. Liang song shiqidiwangnianhaomanyi [Comments of the Chinese emperors’ reign symbols of the North and Southern Song]. Cangsang. 2008;(1). (In Chinese)
  15. Wang Xijia. Zhanxian zongjiao wenhua meili xuxie zhongri jiaoliu xinpian cong riben xin nianhao linghe tanqi [A New Discussion of Attractiveness of Religious Culture in Continuation of Chinese-Japanese Contacts from the Perspective of the New Japanese Era Name “Reiva”]. Zhongguozongjiao. 2019;(4):10. (In Chinese)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).