Concept and essence of the jury verdict in criminal proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The concept and essence of the verdict since the introduction of the jury institute in criminal proceedings has been the subject of scientific research by many procedural scientists, as well as a reason for creative discussions. This is due to its importance in deciding the issue of the guilt or innocence of the defendant in the crime incriminated to him, which is made by the jury based on their assessment of the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense and examined during the trial. At the same time, the verdict, in its essence, is, on the one hand, a reflection of the opinion of society representatives on the legality, validity and reliability of the preliminary investigation and trial, and on the other hand, ensures the fairness of justice in relation to the defendant. At the same time, individual aspects of the verdict from the point of view of its concept and essence, its binding nature for the presiding judge depending on the type of verdict, its reflection of the objectivity of the jury’s assessment of the evidence examined in the court session, and the preventive significance of the verdict still require scientific understanding, taking into account the evolving law enforcement practice.

About the authors

Yuri G. Torbin

All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)

Author for correspondence.
Email: torbinug@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4843-7258
SPIN-code: 4675-2524

Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation; Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander M. Korobkov

All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)

Email: mr.alex007.ru@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 2646-2495

graduate student, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Astafiev A.Yu. Parting word of the presiding judge in the jury: lingua legal aspects. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Right. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 243–252. (In Rus.)
  2. Badashkhanov V.I. People’s element in criminal proceedings in modern conditions. Abstract of dis. ... of Cand. Sci. (Law). Nizhny Novgorod, 1993. 28 p.
  3. Belkin A.A. Controversial merits and obvious shortcomings of the jury. Magistrate. 1998. No. 1. Pp. 10–13. (In Rus.)
  4. Belyaev M.V. Features of decisions made by the court with the participation of jurors. Criminal Justice. 2018. No. 12. Pp. 62–65. (In Rus.)
  5. Belyaev M.V. Parting word of judge in court with the participation of a jury: To be or not to be? Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities. 2017. Vol. 159. No. 2. Pp. 497–503. (In Rus.)
  6. Vedishchev N.P., Ivakin V.N. Raising questions to be resolved by the jury (Article 338 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). Lawyer. 2011. No. 10. Pp. 20–40. (In Rus.)
  7. Vladykina T.A. Compliance with the procedural deadline for the verdict is a guarantee of the stability of the jury verdict. Russian Justice. 2013. No. 11. Pp. 53–55. (In Rus.)
  8. Zolotykh V.V. Raising questions to be resolved by jurors. Practical training manual. Moscow, 2004. 196 p.
  9. Kanevsky B., Bosov A. The Chairman’s parting words from the point of view of speech acts. Criminal Law. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 97–103. (In Rus.)
  10. Kachalova O.V., Belyaev M.V. Jury verdict and social demands of society. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2017. No. 416. Pp. 176–180. (In Rus.)
  11. Kolomenskaya S.A. Verdict of the jury in Russian courts. In: Legal security. Collection of scientific articles. Petrozavodsk, 2023. P. 83.
  12. Kukhtyaeva E.A. Some issues of regulatory regulation of the verdict of the jury. Legal Culture. 2025. No. 1 (60). P. 109. (In Rus.)
  13. Markova T.Yu. Formulation of questions to be resolved by the jury. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2004. 168 p.
  14. Nasonov S.A. Jury verdict in the context of the teachings of P.A. Lupinskaya on decisions in criminal proceedings. Lex Russica. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 609–620. (In Rus.)
  15. Nasonov S.A. Parting word before the of the judge in the jury. Moscow: R. Valent, 2006. 304 p.
  16. Petrovsky N.K. Jury verdict and its socio-legal consequences. Dis. ... of Cand. Sci. (Law). St. Petersburg, 1998. 198 p.
  17. Dictionary of foreign words. 18th ed., erased. Moscow: Russian Language, 1989. 624 p.
  18. Strelkova Yu.V. Jury verdict in criminal proceedings: Theoretical foundations and law enforcement practice author. Dis. ... of Cand. Sci. (Law). Moscow, 2018. 31 p.
  19. Fokov A.P. Revival of the jury in modern Russia. Russian Judge. 2003. No. 9. Pp. 3–4. (In Rus.)
  20. Chistilina D.O. The parting word of the presiding judge with the participation of clerks in the: Legal and moral content. Legal Concept = Legal Paradigm. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 121–125. (In Rus.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).