Email this article The impact of the genesis of sports telegram channels on the rhetorical structure of media text
- Authors: Krylova D.G1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow International University
- Issue: Vol 5, No 9 (2025)
- Pages: 94-100
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2782-5329/article/view/374452
- ID: 374452
Cite item
Abstract
the article examines the features of the structure of media texts of sports Telegram channels in the context of the Rhetorical Structure Theory. Modern sports Telegram channels occupy a significant place in the media consumption of young audiences, which draws attention to the study of the properties of media texts formed in them. From the point of view of genesis, existing Telegram channels can be divided into two main groups: Internet media, representing the adaptation of traditional media in a new communication channel, and social media, which are a product of the evolutionary development of group communications in social networks. To compare media texts, a corpus was used consisting of posts from the MatchTV Telegram channel as a representative of Internet media and the 2DROTS Telegram channel, which represents a typical social media. Comparison of the rhetorical structure of media texts in Telegram channels of different genesis indicates the existence of differences that can logically be associated with the features of their development, primarily the experience of existence on different communication platforms. The style of verbal communication that originated in a social network, when transferred to social media, is reflected in media discourse, making it less institutional. The existence of differences in the rhetorical structure of media texts due to the genesis of telegram channels gives grounds to consider the genesis of media among the properties that influence the characteristics of a media text.
References
- Добросклонская Т.Г. Медиалингвистика: теория, методы, направления: монография. М.: "КДУ", "Добросвет", 2020. 180 с.
- Долженко Н.Г., Сулхаева А.А. Спортивный дискурс в СМИ: особенности семантики и функционирования (на материале терминологии биатлона) // Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2021. № 2 (26). С. 59 – 63.
- Зильберт А.Б., Зильберт Б.А. Спортивный дискурс: базовые понятия и категории, исследовательские задачи // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки, 2017. Т. 17. С. 46 – 57.
- Каминченко Д.И. Интернет-СМИ и социальные медиа: анализ информационных повесток дня // Вопросы журналистики, педагогики и языкознания. 2021. № 40 (4). С. 417 – 430.
- Кирия И.В., Новикова А.А. История и теория медиа: учебник для вузов: 2-е изд. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2020. 424 c.
- Луценко Т.С. Вульгаризация речи как негативная тенденция в спортивных медиатекстах (на материале интернет-порталов «Советский спорт» и «Спорт-экспресс») // Медиаисследования, 2017. № 4 (2). С. 167 – 171.
- Ним Е.Г. «Медиасобытия»: теория, конца которой нет? // Социологический журнал. 2019. Т. 25. № 4. С. 28 – 37.
- Царенко Н.М. Дискурсивный маркер как один из показателей презентационно-интерактивного общения (на примере русскоязычного бьюти-влога) // Верхневолжский филологический вестник. 2022. № 1 (28). С. 146 – 154.
- Шилина М.Г. Актуальные трансформации Веб и смена парадигмы модели сетевой коммуникации // МЕДИА@альманах. 2009. № 30 (1). С. 22 – 29.
- Chistova E. Bilingual Rhetorical Structure Parsing with Large Parallel Annotations. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2024. P. 9689 – 9706.
- Grosz B.J. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse // Computational Linguistics. 1986. No. 3 (12). P. 175 – 204.
- Fisher R.A. On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series A. 1922. Vol. 222. P. 309 – 368.
- Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004. 422 p.
- Mann W.C., Thompson, S.A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization // Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 1988. № 8 (3). P. 243 – 281.
- Toldova S., Pisarevskaya D., Ananyeva M., Kobozeva M., Nasedkin A., Nikiforova S., Pavlova I., Shelepov A. Rhetorical relations markers in Russian RST Treebank // Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Recent Advances in RST and Related Formalisms. 2017. P. 29 – 33.
- Toldova S., Davydova T., Kobozeva M., Pisarevskaya D. Discourse features of blogs in subcorpus of russian ru-rstreebank // Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies "Dialogue". 2020. P. 747 – 767.
Supplementary files
