“It Is All Mine, Native!”: A Sense of Place in the Context of Informal Nature Management (the Case of Karakansky Pine Wood)
- Authors: Lavrusevich P.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk State University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 25-43
- Section: Meanings of Spaces and Spaces of Meanings
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2687-0401/article/view/276751
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.4.2
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GGSBXI
- ID: 276751
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article reveals the analytical potential of the concept of a sense of place in the annex to such large natural objects as suburban forests. On the data of ethnographic case-study held in 2021-2022 in the Novosibirsk region, shown how the biophysical characteristics of the natural-anthropogenic landscape, refracting through the history of life and individual experience of natural resource management, participate in the formation of place attachment, place dependence, place identity and place satisfaction. The components of a sense of place include both rational and irrational components, voluntariness and necessity, choice and lack thereof. Personal experience of pine wood users — rural residents, summer residents and city tourists — is characterized by different degree of rootedness in the landscape, which qualitatively and quantitatively measured by the duration of permanent and seasonal residence, the presence of generational ties with the place, features of environmental management practices. The experience of place, which shapes the value of the place and through it the components of the sense of place, can be both unifying, creating unconditional value, not based on comparison (native places), and individualizing, creating comparative satisfaction and attachment to place (place resource). Strong emotional experiences of unity with nature are balanced, and often reinforced by economic difficulties, which as a result leads to perception of the place not only as the “best”, but also as “native”, “own”.
About the authors
Polina Evgenevna Lavrusevich
Novosibirsk State University
Email: p.lavrusevich@g.nsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-0275-1177
SPIN-code: 2721-4536
ResearcherId: LRC-8099-2024
Senior Lecturer, Sociology Department Novosibirsk, Russia
References
- Головнева Е.В. «Чувство места» в Сибири: эмоциональный компонент сибирской идентичности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. 2017. № 28. С. 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/28/2 EDN: ZVZEYP
- Дом и его обитатели: психологическое исследование / Отв. ред. С.К. Нартова-Бочавер. М.: Памятники исторической мысли, 2018. EDN: YNOZZZ
- Жердева Ю.А. Чувство места как категория социальной памяти // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2015. № 2. С. 5–11. EDN: VZZUXP
- Рагулина М.В. Биорегионализм — англо-американская версия синтеза науки и экологического движения // Юг России: экология, развитие. 2007. Т. 2. № 1. С. 110–112. EDN: MBVWWV
- Лаврусевич П.Е. Жить бором или жить в бору: практики собирательства и присвоение пространства (кейс Караканского бора) // Экономическая социология. 2023. Т. 24. № 3. С. 73–94. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2023-3-73-94
- Плюснин Ю.М. «Свои» и «чужие» в русском провинциальном городе // Мир России. 2013. Т. 22. № 3. С. 60–93. EDN: QCCUBD
- Резниченко С.И. Привязанность к месту и чувство места: модели и феномены // Социальная психология и общество. 2014. Т. 5. № 3. С. 15–27. EDN: SJNSJX
- Скалабан И.А., Алексеев Т.Д., Лаврусевич П.Е. Социальные миры Караканского бора: перспективы сближения и императивы справедливости // Мир России. 2024. Т. 33. № 1. С. 115–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-1-115-143
- Скалабан И.А., Серебрянникова О.А. Территориальная идентичность как фактор социального участия: поколенный контекст // Идеи и идеалы. 2014. Т. 2. № 1. С. 65–74.
- Филиппов А.Ф. Гетеротопология родных просторов // Отечественные записки. 2002. № 6. С. 48–62.
- Ardoin N.M. (2014) Exploring Sense of Place and Environmental Behavior at an Ecoregional Scale in Three Sites. Human Ecology. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 425–441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9652-x
- Ardoin N.M., Gould R.K., Lukacs H., Sponarski C.C., Schuh J.S. (2019) Scale and Sense of Place among Urban Dwellers. Ecosphere. Vol. 10. No. 9. P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2871
- Bott S., Cantrill J.G., Myers O.E. (2003) Place and the Promise of Conservation Psychology. Human Ecology Review. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 100–112
- Cuba L., Hummon D. (1993) A Place to Call Home: Identification with Dwelling, Community and Region. The Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 111–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00133.x
- Eanes F., Robinson P., Silbernagel J. (2018) Effects of Scale and the Biophysical Environment on Sense of Place in Northeastern Wisconsin’s Bioregions. Human Ecology Review. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 71–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22459/HER.24.01.2018.04
- Erfani G. (2022) Reconceptualising Sense of Place: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Investigating Individual-Community-Place Interrelationships. Journal of Planning Literature. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 452–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221081109
- Gallina М., Williams А. (2015) Variations in Sense of Place Across Immigrant Status and Gender in Hamilton, Ontario; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; and, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 121. No. 1. P. 241–252. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0636-4
- Hidalgo M.C., Hernandez B. (2001) Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Question. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 273–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
- Jorgensen B.S., Stedman R.C. (2001) Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes toward Their Properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 233–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
- Kianicka S., Buchecker M., Hunziker M., Müller-Böker U. (2006) Locals’ and Tourists’ Sense of Place: A Case Study in a Swiss Alpine Village. Journal of Mountain Research and Development. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 55–63.
- Massey D. (1991) A Global Sense of Place. Marxism Today. P. 24–29.
- Moore R.L., Graefe A.R. (1994) Attachments to Recreation Settings: The Case of Railtrail Users. Leisure Sciences. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 17–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409409513214
- Nanzer B. (2004) Measuring Sense of Place: A Scale for Michigan. Administrative Theory & Praxis. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 362–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2004.11029457
- Pilkington H. (2012) “Vorkuta Is the Capital of the World”: People, Place and the Everyday Production of the Local. The Sociological Review. Vol. 60. No. 2. Р. 267–291. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02073.x
- Sale K. (2000) Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
- Stedman R.C. (2003) Is It Really Just a Social Construction?: The Contribution of the Physical Environment to Sense of Place. Society & Natural Resources. Vol. 16. No. 8. P. 671–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309189
- Stedman R.C. (2003) Sense of Place and Forest Science: Toward a Program of Quantitative Research. Forest Science. Vol. 49. No. 6. P. 822–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.822
- Tuan Y.F. (1997) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Williams A., Kitchen P. (2012) Sense of Place and Health in Hamilton, Ontario: A Case Study. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 108. P. 257–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0065-1
- Williams D.R. (2014) Making Sense of “Place”: Reflections on Pluralism and Positionality in Place Research. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 131. P. 74–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002
Supplementary files



