Features of Intergenerational Family Communication of Millennials with Their Parents: Attitude to Marriage
- Authors: Salangina O.N.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 89-112
- Section: First Steps
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2687-0401/article/view/268257
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.5
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MFFLFC
- ID: 268257
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of the problems of intergenerational communication within the family between representatives of the millennial generation and their parents about marriage and cohabitation. Based on empirical data, it was concluded that there are changes in the behavioral practices of marriage planning by the millennial generation in comparison with their parents (representatives of the reformed generation). Representatives of millennials postpone the moment of marriage and the practice of cohabitation is becoming more widespread, which was not typical for their parents. This article presents the results of a pilot study using the in-depth interview method and the case study method. Criteria were defined in the form of an analytical scheme for further research of this issue. It was also concluded that differences in the values and practices of two generations give rise to a variety of intergenerational communication — from solidarity to implicit conflict. However, it was proposed as a hypothesis to single out ambivalent solidarity as the main type of intergenerational communication in the form of resolving a value conflict without leading to a direct conflict.
About the authors
Olga Nikolaevna Salangina
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
Email: salangina.olga2016@yandex.ru
MA Student, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Senior Laboratory Assistant, Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS Moscow, Russia
References
- Болдырев В.А. Итоги переписи населения СССР. М.: Финансы и статистика, 1990.
- Boldyrev V.A. (1990) Itogi perepisi naseleniya SSSR [Results of the USSR Population Census]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika. (In Russ.)
- Бурмыкина О.Н. Тенденции изменений межпоколенных семейных отношений // Петербургская социология сегодня. 2019. № 2. С. 134–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25990/socinstras.pss-12.37dm-dk27 EDN: SMCOTK
- Burmykina O.N. (2019) Trends of Changes of Intergenerational Family Relations. Peterburgskaya sociologiya segodnya [Petersburg Sociology Today]. No. 2. P. 134–153. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25990/socinstras.pss-12.37dm-dk27
- Вдовина М.В. Конфликтные взаимоотношения поколений в семье и их регулирование // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2008. № 3. С. 315–321. EDN: JZBMKR
- Vdovina M.V. (2018) Conflicted Interaction Between Generations in a Family and Its Settlement. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod]. No. 3. P. 315–321. (In Russ.)
- Глотов М.Б. Поколение как категория социологии // Социологические исследования. 2004. № 10. С. 42–48. EDN: OWMZGP
- Glotov M.B. (2004) Generation as a Category of Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10. P. 42–48. (In Russ.)
- Ипатова А.А., Тындик А.О. Репродуктивный возраст: 30-й летний рубеж в предпочтениях и биографиях // Мир России. 2015. Т. 24. № 4. С. 123–148. EDN: UIPFFB
- Ipatova A.A., Tyndik A.O. (2015) Reproductive Age: 30 Years Old in Preferences and Biographies. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 123–148. (In Russ.)
- Мангейм К. Проблема поколений // Очерки социологии знания: Проблема поколений — состязательность — экономические амбиции / Под ред. Скворцова Л.В. / Пер. с англ. Е.Я. Додиной. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2000.
- Mannheim K. (2000) Problema pokolenii [The Problem of Generation]. In: Skvorczov L.V. (ed.) Ocherki sociologii znaniya: Problema pokolenii — sostyazatelnost — ekonomicheskie ambicii [Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: The Problem of Generation — Competition — the Nature of Economic Ambition]. Transl. from Eng. by E.Ya. Dodina. Moscow: INION RAN.
- Митрофанова Е.С. Модели взросления разных поколений Россиян // Демографическое обозрение. 2019. Т. 6. № 4. С. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v6i4.10427 EDN: GSPPFS
- Mitrofanova E.S. (2019) Models of the Transition to Adulthood of Different Russian Generations. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review]. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 53–67. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v6i4.10427
- Нечаева Н.А., Бурмыкина О.Н. Теоретическое наследие С.И. Голода и современные исследования семьи, брака межпоколенных отношений // Петербургская социология сегодня. 2020. № 13–14. С. 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25990/socinstras.pss-13-14.kexs-2d58 EDN: RPFXYI
- Nechaeva N.A., Burmykina O.N. (2020) Theoretical Heritage of S.I. Golod and Modem Studies of Family, Marriage and Intergenerational Relationship. Peterburgskaya sociologiya segodnya [St. Petersburg Sociology Today]. No. 13–14. P. 5–22. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25990/socinstras.pss-13-14.kexs-2d58
- Паршина В.В. Межпоколенческие конфликты как одна из проблем функционирования молодой семьи: теоретический аспект // Проблемы современной науки и образования. 2013. № 4. С. 134–137. EDN: SCPLEJ
- Parshina V.V. (2013) Intergenerational Conflicts as One of the Problems in the Functioning of a Young Family: Theoretical Aspect. Problemy sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Science and Education]. No. 4. P. 134–137. (In Russ.)
- Радаев В.В. Миллениалы. Как меняется российского общество. М.: Издательский дом ВШЭ, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1985-1 EDN: STOTFS
- Radaev V.V. (2020) Millenialy: kak menyaetsya rossijskoe obshchestvo [Millennials: How the Russian Society Changes]. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom VShE. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1985-1
- Arnett J.J. (2000) A Emerging Adulthood. Theory of Development From the Late Teens Through the Twenties. American Psycologict. Vol. 55. No. 5. P. 469–480.
- Bengston V. (2001) Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 63. P. 1–16.
- Pillmer K., Lüscher K. (1998) Intergenerational Ambivalence: а New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life. Journal of Marriage and Family. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 413–425.
Supplementary files



