Big oil and climate change: An ecolinguistic perspective


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the context of the ever-worsening climate crisis, the global debate around fossil fuels is keener than ever. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Press Release of 20 March 2023 stated: “In 2018, IPCC highlighted the unprecedented scale of the challenge required to keep warming to 1.5°C. Five years later, that challenge has become even greater due to a continued increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The pace and scale of what has been done so far, and current plans, are insufficient to tackle climate change.” Against this background, this paper investigates the discourse of oil giant TotalEnergies in its report “More Energy, Less Emissions: Sustainability & Climate 2024 Progress Report”. The paper throws an ecolinguistic light on one of the main drivers of climate change, and explores the extent to which such a report may represent an instance of greenwashing. The aim of the study is to reveal linguistic strategies that enable such companies - who have played, and continue to play the most significant role in producing global warming - to present themselves as agents for environmental good. From the critical, discourse-historical perspective, the paper highlights the circulation in government, environmental, corporate and public contexts of both positive and destructive discourses. The findings appear to support the greenwashing hypothesis; the paper thus contributes to the growing tradition of ecolinguistic studies that expose the role of (corporate) language in perpetuating situations of environmental harm.

About the authors

Richard John Alexander

University of Economics and Business

Email: richard.alexander@aon.at
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-2324-7294

Professor Emeritus of English for Business and Economics at the Vienna University of Economics. A graduate of Jesus College, Cambridge, he has taught and researched English as a foreign language, business English, linguistics and language and ecology for over forty-six years at several European universities. He is the author of Framing Discourse on the Environment. A Critical Discourse Approach (2009, New York, Routledge).

Vienna, Austria

Douglas Mark Ponton

University of Catania

Author for correspondence.
Email: dponton@unict.it
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9968-1162

Associate Professor of English Language and Translation at the Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Catania, where he is president of the Masters’ Degree Course “Internationalisation of Business Relations”. His research interests include ecolinguistics, positive discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, Critical discourse studies, pragmatics and applied linguistics. Most recent publication: Exploring Ecolinguistics: Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices (Bloomsbury, 2024).

Catania, Italy

References

  1. Alexander, Richard John. 2017. Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, 196-210. London: Routledge.
  2. Alexander, Richard John. 2024. Is Cargill Inc. Really the Answer to World Hunger? UK: Grosvenor House Publishing Ltd.
  3. Augé, Anaïs 2023. Metaphor and Argumentation in Climate Crisis Discourse. New York: Routledge.
  4. Baker, Paul. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Bowen, Frances & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa. 2014. Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment 27 (2). 107-112.
  6. Chau, Meng Huat, Chenghao Zhu, George M. Jacobs, Nimrod Lawson Delante, Alfian Asmi, Serena Ng, Sharon Santhia John, Qingli Guo & Krishnavanie Shunmugam. 2022. Ecolinguistics for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of World Languages 8 (2). 323-345.
  7. Ciplet, David & J. Timmons Roberts. 2017. Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 46. 148-156.
  8. Döring, Martin & Beate Ratter. 2018. The regional framing of climate change: Towards a place-based perspective on regional climate change perception in north Frisia. Journal of Coastal Conservation (22). 131-143.
  9. Döring, Martin. 2017. Media reports about natural disasters: An ecolinguistic perspective. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 293-308.
  10. Dowson, Nick. 2022. Beyond big oil. New Internationalist May-June. 15-20.
  11. Fill, Alwin & Hermine Penz (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. New York: Routledge.
  12. Fløttum, Kjersti. 2016. Narratives of climate change from the perspective of international negotiations. Journal of Language and Politics 15 (5). 623-646. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
  13. Gabrys, Jennifer. 2020. Climate change and the politics of ecolinguistics. Environmental Communication 14 (2). 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1694336.
  14. Grasso, Marco. 2022. From Big Oil to Big Green: Holding the Oil Industry to Account for the Climate Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  15. Gutstein, Donald. 2018. The Big Stall: How Big Oil and Think Tanks are Blocking Action on Climate Change in Canada. Toronto: Lorimer.
  16. Hansen, Anders & David Machin. 2019. Media and Communication Research Methods. London: Red Globe Press
  17. Howarth, Robert W., Renee Santoro & Anthony Ingraffea. 2011. Methane and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106. 679-90.
  18. Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (2). 249-268.
  19. Jaworska, Sylvia. 2018. Change but no climate change: Discourses of climate change in corporate social responsibility reporting in the oil industry. International Journal of Business Communication 55 (2). 194-219.
  20. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Martin, James R. & Peter R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. Messaris, Paul. 1996. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  23. Mignone, Bryan K., Leon Clarke, James A. Edmonds, Angelo Gurgel, Howard J. Herzog, Johnson Jeremiah X., Dharik S. Mallapragada, Haewon McJeon, Jennifer Morris, Patrick R. O’Rourke, Sergey Paltsev, Steven K. Rose, Daniel C. Steinberg & Aranya Venkatesh,. 2024. Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems. Nature Communications (15). 3938.
  24. Miller, Toby. 2017. Greenwashing Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
  25. Norgaard, Kari. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MIT Press.
  26. Norgaard, Kari. 2019. Climate change denial and ecolinguistics: An integrated approach to communication and action. Language Sciences (74). 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.001.
  27. Penz, Hermine & Alwin Fill. 2022. Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages 8 (2). 232-253.
  28. Poole, Robert. 2022. Corpus-Assisted Ecolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  29. Ponton, Douglas M. 2023. More than just a tree: Ecolinguistics and responses to the felling of ‘Hadrian’s tree’. Russian Journal of Linguistic 27 (4). 797-819. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-36732
  30. Ponton, Douglas M. 2024. Exploring Ecolinguistics. Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices. London, Bloomsbury.
  31. Raslavičius, Laurencas, Artūras Keršys, Saulius Mockus, Neringa Keršienė & Martynas Starevičius. 2014. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as a medium-term option in the transition to sustainable fuels and transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (32). 513-525.
  32. Seele, Peter & Lucia Gatti. 2017. Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (2). 239-252.
  33. Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. London, Routledge.
  35. Stibbe, Arran. 2023. Econarrative: Ethics, Ecology, and the Search for New Narratives to Live By. London, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  36. Synák, František, Kristián Čulík, Vladimír Rievaj & Ján Gaňa. 2019. Liquefied petroleum gas as an alternative fuel. Transportation Research Procedia 40. 527-534.
  37. Vasta, Nicoletta. 2005. Profits and principles: Is there a choice? The multimodal construction of Shell’s commitment to social responsibility and the environment in and across advertising texts. In Giuseppina Cortese & Anna Duszak (eds), Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings, 429-452. Berne: Peter Lang.
  38. Westervelt, Amy. 2021. How to spot five of the fossil fuel industry’s biggest disinformation tactics. The Guardian Thu 9 Sep 2021.
  39. Weiss, Gilbert & Ruth Wodak. 2007. Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In Gilbert Weiss & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. London, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 1-35.
  40. Wiesenthal, Christine, Brad Bucknell & William J.T. Mitchell. 2000. Essays into the Imagetext: An interview with William J. T. Mitchell. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 33 (2). 1-23.
  41. Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 63-95.
  42. Bukold, Steffen for Greenpeace 2023 “The dirty dozen: the climate greenwashing of 12 European oil companies”. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://greenpeace.at/ uploads/2023/08/greenpeace-cee_aug-23_media-briefing_dirty-dozen-report.pdf.
  43. Carbon Brief 2019 “Factcheck: How electric vehicles help to tackle climate change”. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-how-electric-vehicles-help-to-tackle-climate-change/.
  44. Cook, J., Supran, G., Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., & Maibach, E., 2019 “America Misled: How the fossil fuel industry deliberately misled Americans about climate change”. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/ america-misled/.
  45. IPCC 2022 The Sixth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. 2.10.2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ ar6/wg3/.
  46. Lakhani, Nina. 2024. Corporations invested in carbon offsets that were ‘likely junk’” the Guardian Thu 30 May 2024 12.00 CEST. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/30/corporate-carbon-offsets-credits, retrieved 27.10.2024.
  47. Lamb, William F., Mattioli, Giulio, Levi, Sebastian, Roberts, J. Timmons, Capstick, Stuart, Minx, Jan C., Müller-Hansen, Finn, Culhane, Trevor & Steinberger, Julia K. 2020. Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-sustainability/article/discourses-of-climate-delay/7B11B722E3E3454BB6212378E32985A7, retrieved 27.10.2024.
  48. Miliband, Ed 2024 Great British Energy is becoming a reality - bringing with it cheap, clean and secure energy. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.pressreader.com/ australia/the-guardian-australia/20240726/282514368785682.
  49. Milman, Oliver 2024 Global methane emissions rising at fastest rate in decades, scientists warn. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/ 240910121039.htm.
  50. Niranjan, Ajit 2024a France urged to step in to spur TotalEnergies’ transition from oil, the Guardian Wed 19 Jun 2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jun/19/france-urged-to-step-in-to-spur-totalenergies-transition-from-oil.
  51. Niranjan, Ajit 2024b “Climate hero or villain? Fossil fuel frenzy challenges Norway’s green image”, the Guardian Fri 26 Jul 2024 12.00 CEST. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-guardian-usa/20240727/281479281671981.
  52. Noor, Dharna 2024 “News and tech media mostly quiet after UN chief calls for ban on ads for oil and gas”, the Guardian Fri 7 Jun 2024. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/major-oil-companies-lagging-behind-their-climate-targets-according-to-ngo/
  53. Ritchie, Hannah and Rosado, Pablo 2020 “Energy Mix” Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://ourworldindata.org/ energy-mix.
  54. Steffensen, Sune Vork & Stephen J. Cowley. 2021. Thinking on behalf of the world: Radical embodied ecolinguistics. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 723-736.
  55. Toledano, Perrine, Martin Dietrich Brauch & Jiarui Chen. 2022. How Much Have the Oil Supermajors Contributed to Climate Change? New York, Columbia University. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4085011.
  56. TotalEnergies 2024 Sustainability & Climate Progress Report. Retrieved 27 October, 2024, from https://www.csreurope.org/newsbundle-articles/totalenergies-publishes-its-sustainability-climate-2024-progress-report.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Alexander R.J., Ponton D.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».