UPPER BOUND FOR THE COMPETITIVE FACILITY LOCATION PROBLEM WITH DEMAND UNCERTAINTY

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

We consider a competitive facility location problem with two competing parties operating in a situation of uncertain demand scenario. The problem to find the best solutions for the parties is formulated as a discrete bi-level mathematical programming problem. In the paper, we suggest a procedure to compute an upper bound for the objective function on subsets. The procedure could be employed in implicit enumeration schemes capable to compute an optimal solution for the problem under study. Within the procedure, additional constraints iteratively augment the high-point relaxation of the initial bi-level problem, what strengthens the relaxation and improves the upper bound’s quality. New procedure to generate such cuts allows to construct the strongest cuts without enumerating the parameters encoding them.

Sobre autores

V. Beresnev

Sobolev Institute of Mathematics; Novosibirsk State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: beresnev@math.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

A. Melnikov

Sobolev Institute of Mathematics; Novosibirsk State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: melnikov@math.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

Bibliografia

  1. Береснев В.Л., Мельников А.А. Алгоритм генерации отсечений для дискретной задачи конкурентного размещения предприятий. Доклады Академии наук. 2018. V. 480. № 5. P. 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562418030183
  2. Beresnev V., Melnikov A. Approximation of the competitive facility location problem with MIPs. Computers & Operations Research. 2019. V. 104. P. 139–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.010
  3. Ashtiani M. Competitive location: A state-of-art review. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2016. V. 7. № 1. P. 1–18.https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.002
  4. Aras N., Küçükaydın H. Bilevel Models on the Competitive Facility Location Problem. In: Mallozzi L., D’Amato E., Pardalos P. (eds) Spatial Interaction Models. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 118. Springer, Cham. 2017. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52654-6_1
  5. Karakitsiou A. Modeling discrete competitive facility location. Springer Cham, 2015, SpringerBriefs in Optimization, 54.
  6. Mishra M., Singh S.P., Gupta M.P. Location of competitive facilities: a comprehensive review and future research agenda. Benchmarking, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2021-0638
  7. Dempe S. Bilevel Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, Applications and a Bibliography, In: S. Dempe, A. Zemkoho (eds) Bilevel Optimization: Advances and Next Challenges, Springer International Publishing, Cham. 2020. P. 581–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52119-6_20

Declaração de direitos autorais © В.Л. Береснев, А.А. Мельников, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies