THE FIRST FINDINGS OF FROGS (ANURA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF RUSSIA

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Here we describe the first findings of frogs (Anura) from the Upper Cretaceous of Russia – the distal part of the humerus and the tibiofibula fragment. They come from the Maastrichtian dinosaur locality in the city of Blagoveshchensk in the Amur region. The described remains possess an outer and inner structure typical for Anura. These are the easternmost and the youngest frog remains from the Upper Cretaceous of Asia.

About the authors

P. P. Skutschas

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

А. P. Bogoy

Blagoveschensk State Pedagogical University

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, Blagoveshchensk

D. A. Lubchenkov

Institute of Geology and Nature Management, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Blagoveschensk State Pedagogical University

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, Blagoveshchensk; Russian, Blagoveshchensk

V. A. Gvozdkova

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg

I. A. Parakhin

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

E. V. Mazur

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg

D. D. Vitenko

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

R. A. Bapinaev

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

D. V. Grigoriev

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

I. T. Kuzmin

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

I. Y. Bolotsky

Institute of Geology and Nature Management, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, Blagoveshchensk

V. V. Kolchanov

Saint Petersburg State University; Zooloogical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg

Y. L. Bolotsky

Institute of Geology and Nature Management, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p.skutschas@spbu.ru
Russian, Blagoveshchensk

References

  1. Болотский Ю.Л., Курзанов С.М. Гадрозавры Приамурья // Геология Тихоокеанского обрамления. Благовещенск: ДВО АН СССР. 1991. С. 94–103.
  2. Bolotsky Y.L., Godefroit P. A new hadrosaurine dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Far Eastern Russia // Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2004. V. 24. P. 351–365.
  3. Godefroit P., Bolotsky Y.L., Van Itterbeeck J. The lambeosaurine dinosaur Amurosaurus riabinini, from the Maastrichtian of Far Eastern Russia // Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2004. V. 49 № 4. P. 585–618.
  4. Болотский И.Ю., Болотский Ю.Л., Сорокин А.П. Первая находка когтевой фаланги дромеозаврида (Dinosauria: Dromaeosauridae) из Благовещенского местонахождения позд-немеловых динозавров (Амурская область) // Доклады Академии наук. 2019. Т. 484. № 2. С. 184–186.
  5. Болотский И.Ю., Ермацанс И.А., Болотский Ю.Л. Остатки хищных динозавров семейства Tyrannosauridae из местонахождений Благовещенск и Кундур (Приамурье, Россия) // Биота и среда природных территорий. 2021. № 2. С. 49–70.
  6. Bolotsky I.U. On paleoecology of carnivorous dinosaurs (Tyrannosauridae,Dromaeosauridae) from Late Cretaceous fossil deposits of Amur region, Russian Far East // Global geology. 2011. V. 14. Issue 1. P. 1–14.
  7. Millard N., Stephenson T.A. The vascular anatomy of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). // Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 1940. V. 28 № 5. P. 387–439.
  8. Venczel et al. New insights into Europe’s most diverse Late Cretaceous anuran assemblage from the Maastrichtian of western Romania // Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments. 2016. V. 96. P. 61–95.
  9. Gardner J.D., DeMar D.G. Mesozoic and Palaeocene lissamphibian assemblages of North America: a comprehensive review // Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments. 2013. V. 93. P. 459–515.
  10. Roček Z., Eaton J. G., Gardner J., Přikryl T. Evolution of anuran assemblages in the Late Cretaceous of Utah, USA // Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments. 2010. V. 90. № 4. P. 341–393.
  11. Shishkin M.A. Mesozoic amphibians from Mongolia and the central Asian republics. In: Benton M.J., Shishkin M.A., Unwin D.M., Kurochkin E.N. (Eds.), The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia // Cambridge University Press. 2000. P. 297–308.
  12. Roček Z. Mesozoic and Tertiary Anura of Laurasia // Palaeobiodivers. palaeoenviron. 2013. V. 93. P. 397–439.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (3MB)

Copyright (c) 2023 П.П. Скучас, В.В. Колчанов, И.Ю. Болотский, И.Т. Кузьмин, Д.В. Григорьев, Р.А. Бапинаев, Д.Д. Витенко, Е.В. Мазур, И.А. Парахин, В.А. Гвоздкова, Д.А. Любченков, А.П. Богой, Ю.Л. Болотский

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies