Justification of the need and prospects for the transition of businesses to the use of sustainable product packaging

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

the purpose of the study is to substantiate the need for businesses to transition to sustainable product packaging and to identify the economic barriers that affect the speed and scale of implementing environmentally friendly packaging solutions. Methods: the study employs analytical-comparative, economic-mathematical, and economic-analytical methods, as well as elements of modeling and comparative analysis of open data. The empirical basis includes open data from packaging material manufacturers and the results of cost assessments comparing traditional and sustainable packaging. Findings: the study presents comparative models and calculations reflecting the relationship between costs and benefits in the use of traditional and sustainable packaging. Using VANPACK packaging solutions as an example, it was found that despite the higher short-term cost of sustainable materials, in the long term their use contributes to reducing total expenses and increasing business competitiveness. Conclusions: the transition to sustainable packaging is an economically and strategically justified direction of sustainable business development. The findings confirm that the implementation of eco-friendly packaging solutions enables companies to adapt to new environmental regulations, strengthen market positions, and build an ESG-oriented corporate image, thereby providing additional qualitative justification for the transition.

About the authors

D. A Rodionov

VANPAK, Moscow

References

  1. Бумажный скотч активируемый водой [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vanpak.ru/products/water-activated_adhesive_tape/
  2. Родионов Д.А. Особенности и способы перехода бизнеса к использованию экологичной упаковки товаров // Журнал прикладных исследований. 2025. № 10. С. 54 – 64. doi: 10.47576/2949-1878.2025.10.10.007
  3. Родионов Д.А. Современные тенденции и перспективы развития рынка экологичной упаковки // Экономика и бизнес: теория и практика. 2025. № 8. С. 135 – 141. doi: 10.24412/2411-0450-2025-8-135-141.
  4. Сотовая (сетчатая) крафт-бумага [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vanpak.ru/products/honeycomb_paper/
  5. Упаковочная крафт-бумага [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vanpak.ru/products/packing_kraft_paper/
  6. Является ли экологичная упаковка более дорогой? Разбираемся в стоимости экологичной упаковки [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://somewang.com/ru/blog/is-sustainable-packaging-more-expensive/
  7. Afif K., Rebolledo C., Roy J. Drivers, barriers and performance outcomes of sustainable packaging: a systematic literature review // British Food Journal. 2022. Vol. 124, No. 3. P. 915 – 935. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2021-0150.
  8. Asim Z., Shamsi I.R.A., Wahaj M., Raza A., Abul Hasan S., Siddiqui S.A., Aladresi A., Sorooshian S., Seng Teck T. Significance of Sustainable Packaging: A Case-Study from a Supply Chain Perspective // Applied System Innovation. 2022. Vol. 5. P. 117. doi: 10.3390/asi5060117.
  9. Ibrahim I.D., Hamam Y., Sadiku E.R., Ndambuki J.M., Kupolati W.K., Jamiru T., Eze A.A., Snyman J. Need for Sustainable Packaging: An Overview. Polymers (Basel). 2022. Vol. 14. No. 20. P. 4430. doi: 10.3390/polym14204430.
  10. Lau C.C.I., Wong C.W.Y. Achieving sustainable development with sustainable packaging: A natural-resource-based view perspective // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024. Vol. 33, No. 5. P. 4766–4787. doi: 10.1002/bse.3720.
  11. Mudgal D., Pagone E., Salonitis K. Selecting sustainable packaging materials and strategies: A holistic approach considering whole life cycle and customer p

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).