Identification of COVID-19 spread factors in Europe based on causal analysis of medical interventions and socio-economic data

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Since the appearance of COVID-19, a huge amount of data has been obtained to help understand how the virus evolved and spread. The analysis of such data can provide new insights which are needed to control the progress of the epidemic and provide decision-makers with the tools to take effective measures to contain the epidemic and minimize the social consequences. Analysing the impact of medical treatments and socioeconomic factors on coronavirus transmission has been given considerable attention. In this work, we apply panel autoregressive distributed lag modelling (ARDL) to European Union data to identify COVID-19 transmission factors in Europe. Our analysis showed that non-medicinal measures were successful in reducing mortality, while strict isolation virus testing policies and protection mechanisms for the elderly have had a positive effect in containing the epidemic. Results of Dumitrescu-Hurlin paired-cause tests show that a bidirectional causal relationship exists for all EU countries causal relationship between new deaths and pharmacological interventions factors and that, on the other hand, some socioeconomic factors cause new deaths when the reverse is not true.

About the authors

Kouame A. Brou

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: broureino@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1996-577X

PhD student of Information Technology Department

6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. S. L. Priyadarsini and M. Suresh, “Factors influencing the epidemiological characteristics of pandemic COVID 19: a TISM approach,” International Journal of Healthcare Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89- 98, 2020. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2020.1755804.
  2. A. Farseev, Y.-Y. Chu-Farseeva, Q. Yang, and D. B. Loo, “Understanding economic and health factors impacting the spread of covid-19 disease,” medRxiv, 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.10.20058222. eprint: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/09/2020.04.10.20058222.full.pdf.
  3. K. Tantrakarnapa, B. Bhopdhornangkul, and K. Nakhaapakorn, “Influencing factors of COVID-19 spreading: a case study of Thailand,” Journal of Public Health, vol. 30, pp. 621-627, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10389-02001329-5.
  4. W.-X. Tang, H. Li, M. Hai, and Y. Zhang, “Causal Analysis of Impact Factors of COVID-19 in China,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 199, no. 10229, pp. 1483-1489, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.189.
  5. R. Chaudhry, G. Dranitsaris, T. Mubashir, J. Bartoszko, and S. Riazi, “A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes,” eClinical Medicine, vol. 25, p. 100464, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100464.
  6. A. Levin, C.-F. Lin, and C.-S. J. Chu, “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties.,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 108 (1), pp. 1-24, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.
  7. M. H. Pesaran, T. Schuermann, and S. M. Weiner, “Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 22, pp. 129-162, 2004. doi: 10.1198/073500104000000019.
  8. M. Pesaran, Y. Shin, and R. J. Smith, “Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationship.,” Journal of Applied Econometrics. Special Issue: In Memory of John Denis Sargan 1924-1996: Studies in Empirical Macroeconometrics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 289-326, 2001. doi: 10.1002/JAE.616.
  9. M. P. Clements and D. F. Hendry, “Forecasting in cointegrated systems,” Applied Econometrics, vol. 10, pp. 127-146, 1995. doi: 10.1002/jae.3950100204.
  10. S. Johansen, “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 231-254, 1988. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3.
  11. R. Engle and C. Granger, “ Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.,” Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 251-276, 1987. doi: 10.2307/1913236.
  12. E.-I. Dumitrescu and C. Hurlin, “Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels,” Economic Modelling, vol. 29, pp. 1450-1460, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download