Email this article Citation and Reputation rating of Historians
- Authors: Nefedov S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 128-132
- Section: DOCUMENTARIES, DOCUMENTATION, ARCHIVAL STUDIES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4654/article/view/257449
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2023-5-2-128-132
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WFKMYY
- ID: 257449
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the relationship between the citation of historians and the expertly determined reputation rating. Comparative shortcomings of scientometrics and expert assessments are noted. Using the scale of reputation ratings based on the results of a sociological survey conducted by M. M. Sokolov and the data of the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI), the author calculates the Spearman rank correlation coefficients between these indicators. At the same time, it turns out that there is no correlation between reputation with a five-year total citation according to the RSCI and citation (both general and five years) according to the core of the RSCI. A weak correlation of reputation with long-term total citation according to the RSCI is found, however, this correlation also becomes insignificant after the exclusion of the unique data of B. N. Mironov.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Sergey A. Nefedov
Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: hist1@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 9830-0926
Scopus Author ID: 40861593700
ResearcherId: Q-1642-2015
Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Associate Professor, Chief Researcher
Russian Federation, YekaterinburgReferences
- Alekseev V.V. On the issue of increasing the objectivity of the evaluation of scientific projects // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. V. 88. No. 12. P. 1160–1161.
- Eremenko T. V. The quality of citation of the works of scientists in the region: bibliometric analysis on the example of the Ryazan region // Sociology of science and technology. 2019. No. 2. P. 129–149.
- Collins R. Sociology of Philosophy: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph, 2002. 1282 p.
- Moskaleva O. V., Akoev M. A. Scientometrics: a bit of history and modern Russian realities // Management of science: theory and practice. 2019. No. 1. P. 135–148.
- Orlov A.I. Organizational and economic modeling. M.: Publishing house of MSTU. 2011. 486 p.
- Sokolov M. Russian historians. Portrait of an academic profession. Publishing house of EUSP, 2023. 31 p.
- Shipovalova L.V., Gallyamov R.I. Scientometrics: pro et contra // Ratio.ru. 2018. No. 1 (19). P. 70–82.
- Nefedov S, Ellman M. The Development of Living Standards in Russia Before the First World War: An Examination of the Anthropometric Data//Revolutionary Russia. 2016. Vol. 29. Issue 2. P. 149–168.
Supplementary files
