Genesis of the Institution of Denunciation in the Theory and Practice of the Law of Treaties
- Authors: Gu W.1, Chernykh I.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 36-52
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2644-5514/article/view/361965
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2644-5514.2025.1.72988
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AXRVNQ
- ID: 361965
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
International treaties throughout the history have always played a key role in regulating relations between states. However, the constant development of international law and the changing conjuncture of international relations have led to both the conclusion and withdrawal from international treaties. The doctrine of international law, including the history of international law and the law of treaties, focuses more on the procedures of signing, conclusion and entry into force of international treaties, while the issues of termination of international treaties have less attention from international legal scholars. The relevance of the topic of denunciation of international treaties is due to both the difficulties arising in the exercise of the right to denunciation and the need for a detailed international legal regulation of this process. In order to identify the essential characteristics of the institution of denunciation of international treaties, the article conducts a comprehensive historical and legal analysis using the methods of comparative legal research. The novelty of this article lies in systematizing the evolution of the right to denunciation of international treaties from exogenous to endogenous character, as well as in identifying the influence of political factors on its practical implementation. For the first time, these developments are considered in the context of the fundamental principle of the law of treaty - pacta sunt servanda. It is noted that the institution of denunciation of international treaties has undergone significant evolution since ancient times. The key role in its formation was played by the London Convention of 1871 and the Vienna Convention of 1969. These documents were used to develop the periodization of the right to denunciation, which includes three stages. The existing international legal framework regulates the application of the right of denunciation in a non-exhaustive manner, resulting in a fragmented practice. Further development of this institution requires the unification of norms and mechanisms of control of the right to denunciation to prevent abuse of this right and to ensure the stability of international treaties.
About the authors
Wenshuo Gu
Email: 1042225079@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8484-3796
Irina Alekseevna Chernykh
Email: chernykh-ia@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5369-1736
References
卜璐[Бу Лу]. 论国际条约的单方退出[Об одностороннем выходе из международных договоров] // 环球法律评论[Глобальное правовое обозрение]. 2018. № 3. С. 154–170. Осминин Б.И. Правовые модели прекращения и приостановления государствами действия международных договоров // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2019. № 4(77). С. 116–133. Ильинская О.И. Право международных договоров. М.: Проспект, 2021. – 154 с. Ильинская О.И. Прекращение действия международных договоров: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Москва, 2008. – 250 с. Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1948. – 516 p. Waltz K.N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1979. – 251 p. Gulati M. Customary international law and withdrawal rights in an age of treaties // Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. 2010. № 21. С. 1–30. Исполинов А.С. Прекращение международных договоров: буйство красок за рамками Венской конвенции о праве международных договоров 1969 года // Международное правосудие. 2022. № 3(43). С. 75–95. Талалаев А.Н. Право международных договоров (историко-правовой очерк) // Советский ежегодник международного права. 1972. С. 44–70. Денисова Е.А. Правовые основы реституции культурных ценностей, перемещенных во время и по окончании Второй мировой войны // Вестник МГИМО Университета. 2012. № 1 (22). С. 281–287. Helfer R.L. Exiting Treaties // Virginia Law Review. 2005. № 91. С. 1579–1648. Bradley A., Gulati M. Customary international law and withdrawal rights in an age of treaties // Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. 2010. № 21. С. 1–30. Талалаев А.Н. Венская конвенция о праве международных договоров. Комментарий / Сост.: Талалаев А.Н. (Коммент.); Отв. ред.: Захарова Н.В. (Предисл.). М.: Юрид. лит., 1997. – 336 c. Лукашук И.И. Современное право международных договоров. М.: Wolters Kluwer, 2004. – 672 с. Капустин А.Я. Современная концепция взаимодействия международного и внутригосударственного права. М.: Издательский Дом Инфра-М, 2023. – 336 с. Бальхаева С.Б. Правовой статус региональных международных организаций как третьих сторон в соответствии с правом международных договоров // Журнал российского права. 2023. Т. 27. № 8. С. 109–119. Капустин А.Я., Авхадеев В.Р. [и др.]. Современная концепция толкования международных договоров. М.: Издательский Дом Инфра-М, 2022. – 432 с.
Supplementary files

