Application of multi-criteria evaluation methods to create urban development opportunities within the concept of sustainable architecture of buildings and urban areas

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The advancement of urban development has made it possible to improve the quality of infrastructure and the organization of urban territories, affecting cities’ competitiveness and investment attractiveness. The study aims to apply multi-criteria evaluation methods to create urban development opportunities in the sustainable architecture of buildings and urban areas. The primary data collection methods include document analysis and an expert survey. Through document analysis, the authors identify the basic methods of evaluating buildings and architectural objects to establish compliance with the requirements of sustainable architecture. The expert survey results highlight the most dynamically developing and globally recognized methods: LEED and BREEAM. Further analysis sheds light on the specific features of criteria-based evaluation of buildings under LEED and BREEAM certification, compares the lists of building evaluation criteria in BREEAM and LEED, and considers the practical implementation of LEED and BREEAM building certification while highlighting and describing architectural objects. The authors conclude that the standards defined in the BREEAM and LEED multi-criteria methods exhaustively conform to the principles of sustainable architecture, encompassing environmental, economic, and social conditions. BREEAM and LEED can be applied to new and modernized residential and public buildings.

Sobre autores

A. Fatkullina

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering National Research University

ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4407-8259

V. Bezpalov

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4017-1328

S. Lochan

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8704-7538

D. Fedyunin

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8526-3322

S. Avtonomova

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2468-5871

A. Zotova

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6885-4414

Bibliografia

  1. Kolchev I.A. Evaluating European public real estate association (EPRA) metrics for benchmark outperformance. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope. 2024. 5 (3). P. 879 – 893. doi: 10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i03.0858
  2. Salaimeh S.A. Determine the modern requirements for architectural design, depending on the logistic center. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science. 2024. 14 (3). P. 35 – 40. doi: 10.31407/ijees14.3
  3. Khakimov N., Fatkullina A., Aleksandrova I., Bilovus V., Zaharova L., Listopad M. The impact of modular residential construction and hybridization processes on the social aspects of urbanization and sustainable urban development. Relações Internacionais no Mundo Atual. 2024. 1 (43). P. 410 – 423.
  4. Tesler Yu.A., Telichenko V.I., Tesler K.I. Classification and architectural planning components of riverine areas in the city structure. Construction Materials and Products. 2024. 7 (2). 6. doi: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-2-6
  5. Røstvik H.N. Sustainable architecture – What's next? Encyclopedia. 2021. 1 (1). P. 293 – 313. doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia1010025
  6. Ilyushin Y., Afanaseva O. Modeling of a spatial distributed management system of a preliminary hydro-cleaning gasoline steam column. In: International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference surveying geology and mining ecology management, SGEM, 2020. Sofia: STEF92 Technology, 2020. P. 531 – 538. doi: 10.5593/sgem2020/2.1/s08.068
  7. Mayboroda V., Mayboroda E., Spirin P. Formation and legal regulation of urban agglomerations in the Russian Federation: Ensuring sustainable development of territories. Revista Jurídica. 2023. 4 (76). P. 1 – 5.
  8. Salingaros N.A. Architectural knowledge: Lacking a knowledge system, the profession rejects healing environments that promote health and well-being. New Design Ideas. 2024. 8 (2). P. 261 – 299. doi: 10.62476/ndi82261
  9. Kumawat V.S., Ahire H. Review paper on sustainable architecture. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2020. 7 (7). P. 1125 – 1129.
  10. Marques B., Loureiro C.R. Sustainable architecture: Practices and methods to achieve sustainability in construction. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2013. 5 (2). P. 223 – 226. doi: 10.7763/IJET.2013.V5.547
  11. Chansomsak S., Vale B. Sustainable architecture: Architecture as sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 2008 World sustainable building conference (SB08). Melbourne: ASN Events Pty Ltd, 2008. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4989.8009
  12. Berardi U. Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable Development. 2012. 20 (6). P. 411 – 424. doi: 10.1002/sd.532
  13. Asadulagi M.-A.M., Pershin I.M., Tsapleva V.V. Research on hydrolithospheric processes using the results of groundwater inflow testing. Water. 2024. 16 (3). 487. doi: 10.3390/w16030487
  14. Ilyushin Y., Martirosyan A. The development of the soderberg electrolyzer electromagnetic field's state monitoring system. Scientific Reports. 2024. 14. 3501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52002-w
  15. Kibert C. The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research & Information. 2007. 35 (6). P. 595 – 601. doi: 10.1080/09613210701467040
  16. Celadyn W. Durability of buildings and sustainable architecture. Technical Transactions. 2014. 7A (14). P. 17 – 26.
  17. Baweja V. Sustainable architecture: A short history. In: Routledge handbook of the history of sustainability, 1st ed., J. Caradonna (Ed.). New York: Routledge, 2018. P. 273 – 294.
  18. Hanga-Fărcaş I.F., Bungău C.C., Scurt A.A., Criste M., Prad M.F. The building certification system – A tool of sustainable development of university campuses. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences. 2023. 13 (1). P. 105 – 112. doi: 10.2478/jaes-2023-0014
  19. Mammadova G., Akbarova S. Certification methods as a mechanism for estimation of building sustainability. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. 458. 07017. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202345807017
  20. Darçın P., Taygun G.T., Vural M. Evaluation of LEED 'Water efficiency' case study: Diyarbakır Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4-9, 2016. P. 210 – 212.
  21. Süzer O. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015. 154. P. 266 – 283. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.029
  22. Kurnaz A. Green building certification system as a greenwashing strategy in architecture. International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 2021. 4 (1). P. 72 – 88.
  23. Abraham Y., Greenwood L., Andoh N.Y., Schneider J. Sustainable building without certification: An exploration of implications and trends. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2022. 4 (2). e220007. doi: 10.20900/jsr20220007
  24. Chen X., Yang H., Lu L. A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015. 50. P. 1425 – 1436. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.003
  25. Sanchez Cordero A., Gomez Melgar S., Andujar Marquez J.M. Green building rating systems and the new framework level (s): A critical review of sustainability certification within Europe. Energies. 2020. 13 (1). 66. doi: 10.3390/en13010066
  26. Bragança L., Vieira S., Andrade J. Early stage design decisions: The way to achieve sustainable buildings at lower costs. The Scientific World Journal. 2014. 2014. 65364. doi: 10.1155/2014/365364
  27. Donovan E. Explaining sustainable architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. 588. 032086. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032086
  28. Uğur L.O., Leblebici N. An examination of the LEED green building certification system in terms of construction costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018. 81. P. 1476 – 1483. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.210
  29. Jeong J., Hong T., Ji C., Kim J., Lee M., Jeong K. Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED. Building and Environment. 2016. 105. P. 172 – 184. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.041
  30. Guo A, Liu Z. A new method for energy efficiency design of building facade and its thermodynamic evaluation. International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2020. 38 (4). P. 903 – 913. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.380417
  31. Pradipta, I.G.NG.G.A., Putri L.G.S. Sustainable water governance based on the local wisdom of Tri Hita Karana and Sad Kertih values: Impact for environmental sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Impacts. 2024. 7 (2). P. 181 – 190. doi: 10.18280/ijei.070203
  32. Liu Z., Guo A. Application of green building materials and multi-objective energy-saving optimization design. International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2021. 39 (1). P. 299 – 308. doi: 10.18280/ijht.390133
  33. Grafkina M.V., Sviridova E.Y. Application of risk-oriented approach for improvement of the environmental security of the urban area. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 2022. 12 (4). P. 519 – 524. doi: 10.18280/ijsse.120413
  34. Kusuma H., Muafi, Kholid M.N. Sustainable technology adoption and green competitive advantage: An empirical study of msmes in Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. 2024. 4 (3). e02250. doi: 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n03.pe02250
  35. Dakhia A., Zemmouri N. Energy optimization and environmental impact of an office building at Biskra city, Algeria: Life cycle assessment, applied to the building envelope in hot and dry climate. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2021. 16 (2). P. 287 – 297. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.160208
  36. Ospanov T., Prodanova N., Sarvut T., Matytsin A., Hajiyev H., Hajiyev E., Shichiyakh R., Akhmetshin E. Developing architectural design solutions and the interior organization of compact apartments with a comfortable living environment (a case study of the real estate market in Russia and Kazakhstan). Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2024. 12 (4). P. 2567 – 2576. doi: 10.13189/cea.2024.120406
  37. Yessenbayev A., Akhmetshin E., Kurikov V., Hajiyev H., Chernova O., Litvinov A., Shichiyakh R., Alkhanov N. Application of the adaptive approach for forming the concept of an inclusive residential environment in the context of regional differences. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2024. 12 (5). P. 3480 – 3499. doi: 10.13189/cea.2024.120526
  38. Syam F.H., Wisdianti D., Sajar S., Bahri S. Study of sustainable architecture concepts. International Journal of Research and Review. 2023. 10 (4). P. 419 – 424. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20230450
  39. Zimmermann R.K., Skjelmose O., Jensen K.G., Jensen K.K., Birgisdottir H. Categorizing building certification systems according to the definition of sustainable building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 471. 092060. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060
  40. Birgisdottir H., Hansen K. Test of BREEAM, DGNB, HQE and LEED on two Danish office buildings. In: SB11 Helsinki – World sustainable building conference, Proceedings, P. Huovila (Ed.). Helsinki: RIL – Finnish Association of Civil Engineers, 2011. P. 879 – 887.
  41. Dobson D., Sourani A., Sertyesilisik B., Tunstall A. Sustainable construction: Analysis of its costs and benefits. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2013. 1 (2). P. 32 – 38. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-1-2-2
  42. Bazhina M.A.. Intelligent transport systems as the basis of de Lege Ferenda of the transport system of the Russian Federation. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. 2023. 1 (3). P. 629 – 649. doi: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.27
  43. Dumitras A. Sustainable factors of the landscape architecture and its influence on the energy efficiency. ProEnvironment Promediu. 2013. 6 (15). P. 452 – 456.
  44. Amado M., Lucas V., Ribeiro M. Sustainable construction: Value of certification. In: Proceedings of the International conference on advances in civil, structural and environmental engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 2013. P. 180 – 187.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).