Transformation of the competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
- Authors: Krasnoslobodtseva N.K.1
-
Affiliations:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 548-556
- Section: Issues of Private and Public Law
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/351749
- ID: 351749
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the reasons for the expansion of the competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the changes in the powers of the supreme body of the Russian constitutional justice, enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993 and Federal Constitutional Law No. 1-FKZ dated July 21, 1994 “On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation” in the period from 1994 to 2025, are analyzed. It has been established that almost all chapters of the Federal Law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation regulating the powers of the supreme judicial body of constitutional control have been amended, and new categories of constitutional cases have appeared. 2020 was one of the most intense periods of transformation for the Constitutional Court. The study of the institute of citizens’ appeals to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation allowed us to formulate the conclusion that, in general, the conditions and procedure for filing complaints have become tougher in recent years, respectively, the number of appeals has decreased, but still this type of constitutional proceedings is one of the most implemented in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The blurring of the boundaries of sovereignty by the mechanisms of international justice has become the reason for the turn of state and legal policy towards the concept of the identity of Russian civilization. This was reflected in the emergence of the doctrine of constitutional identity, which came up with the idea to consolidate new categories of constitutional cases in 2015 and 2020: on the possibility of executing decisions of an interstate body, a foreign or international (interstate) court, a foreign or international arbitration court (arbitration). The study led to the conclusion that constitutional justice occupies a unique place in the system of modern law and order, and the development of the most optimal and effective model of constitutional justice is an important goal for any modern state, including Russia.
About the authors
Natalia K. Krasnoslobodtseva
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: nkrasnoslobodceva@tsutmb.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-0147-1719
SPIN-code: 7057-6924
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Constitutional and International Law Department of Institute of Law and National Security
Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov, 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Zorkin V.D. (2017). Constitutional Identity of Russia: Doctrine and Practice. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya = Journal of Constitutional Justice, no. 4, pp. 1-12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zeinvx
- Ispolinov A.S. An Unnoticed amendment to the Constitution: the YUKOS affair and the new role of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in defining public policy. Informatsionno-pravovoi portal «Zakon.ru». = Information and Legal Portal “Zakon.ru”. 20.03.2020. (In Russ.) URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/3/20/nezamechennaya_popravka_k_konstitucii_sled_dela_yukosa_i_novaya_rol_konstitucionnogo_suda_rf_v_opred
- Kuznetsov S.A. comp., gen. ed. (2000). Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. St. Petersburg, Norint Publ., 1536 p. (In Russ.)
- Blokhin P.D. (2025). Methods of Constitutional Justice. Experience of Russia, Germany and USA. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 352 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gauruy
- Blokhin P.D. (2024). Constitutional conformist interpretation: doctrine and practice. Normativnost’ v prave: ponyatie, interpretatsii, vzaimosvyaz’ s drugimi pravovymi svoistvami = Normativity in Law: Concept, Interpretations, and Relationship with Other Legal Properties, St. Petersburg, Skifiya-print Publ., 412 p. (In Russ.)
- Fedonina Yu.V. (2018). On the activities of the Highest Court in a special regime. Advokatskaya gazeta = Advocate Newspaper, no. 17 (274). (In Russ.) URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/pechatnaya-ag/274/
- Ermolenko A. (2018). The activities of the Constitutional court must be open and public. Advokatskaya gazeta = Advocate Newspaper, no. 17 (274). (In Russ.) URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/pechatnaya-ag/274/
- Krasnov M. (2016). Interpretations of the constitution as its actual amendments. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, no. 1, pp. 77-91. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tkgwef
- Klishas A.A. (2021). On the role of the constitutional court of Russia in the context of its new powers for preliminary constitutional control. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya = Journal of Constitutional Justice, no. 5, pp. 10-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4144-2021-5-10-22, https://elibrary.ru/vatipm
- Zor’kin V.D. Preliminary results of the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the threshold of 15th anniversary (1991–2006). Internet interview with the Chairman of the Constitutional Court. KonsultantPlyus = ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.consultant.ru/law/interview/zorkin/
Supplementary files




