Right to ownership on residential premises

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is due to the importance of such an element of the constitutional and legal status of man and citizen as the right to housing. According to para. 1, Art. 40 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation everyone has the right to housing. At the present stage of social relations development the problem of proper maintenance of right to ownership on residential premises remains acute. The realization of the right to ownership of housing is the foundation for the functioning of the economic and social policy of the state. The purpose of the study is to consider the specifics and content of legal relations related to the ownership, use and disposal of residential premises. We identify the concept of “residential premise”, we also include the scholars position regarding this issue. We consider the proprietary rights for the use, ownership and disposal of property, which in their unity constitute the content of the property right of residential premises. In addition, we analyze the basic provisions of the regulations governing the implementation of the right of ownership of residential premises. We designate the grounds for the emergence of residential premises ownership, as well as the rights and obligations of the owner of the premises. We concluded that the property right is inalienable and serves as a guarantee of the constitutional right to housing.

About the authors

Vladimir Viktorovich Bulgakov

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: bvv30081960@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5223-1527

Candidate of JurisprudenceAssociate ProfessorAssociate Professor of Civil Law Department

Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Titov A.A. Kommentariy k Zhilishchnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Comment to the Housing Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2011, 541 p. (In Russian).
  2. Krasheninnikov P.V. Zhilishchnoye pravo [Housing Law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2016, 384 p. (In Russian).
  3. Makeyev P.V. O roli kategorii prednaznachennosti v opredelenii ponyatiya zhilogo pomeshcheniya [About the role of the category of destination in premises concept definition]. Semeynoye i zhilishchnoye pravo – Family and Housing Law, 2010, no. 6, pp. 44-47. (In Russian).
  4. Lapina M.A. Soderzhaniye prava sobstvennosti grazhdan na zhiloye pomeshcheniye [The maintenance of the property right of citizens on premises]. Transportnoye delo Rossii – Transport Business of Russia, 2011, no. 12, pp. 112-114. (In Russian).
  5. Sukhanov E.A. (executive ed.). Grazhdanskoye pravo: v 2 t. [Civil Law: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, 2004, vol. 1, 330 p. (In Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Bulgakov V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).