Problems of realization and the prospects of the proofs disclosure principle development in civil legal procedure
- Authors: Salmanidina A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Law Academy
- Issue: Vol 2, No 7 (2018)
- Pages: 116-124
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/366907
- ID: 366907
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We consider the principle of proofs disclosure in civil procedure, the issues of its implementation and prospects of development. The significance and manifestation of this proof principle at the preparation stage of the case for trial are studied in detail. The importance of this principle for ensuring equality of the parties in the context of information openness of the judicial process, as well as the possibility of combating abuses committed by the process participants, in cases where the decisive proof can be presented “suddenly” for other participants. The problems of legal regulation of proofs disclosure are analyzed, it is proposed to establish as one of the tasks of preparing the case for trial the advance proofs disclosure by the persons involved in the case, which is to present them to each other before the end of the preparation of the case for trial. The concept, stages and forms of disclosure of evidence are defined, the interrelation of the principle of proof with the general principles of civil procedure is considered. Using the practice of preliminary interrogation as a form of proofs disclosure at the preparation stage of the case for trial, which can be an effective way to advance acquaintance with the evidence presented in the case. It is concluded that in the civil procedural legislation it is advisable to fix in detail the concept, procedure, forms of proofs disclosure and the consequences of their non-compliance by people involved in the case.
About the authors
Aleksandra Sergeyevna Salmanidina
Saratov State Law Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: alexasal94@mail.ru
Post-Graduate Student, Civil Process Department
Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov 410056, Russian FederationReferences
- Ageshkina N.A., Belyaev M.A., Biryukova T.A., Vakhrusheva Y.N., Velikanov A.P., Elizarova N.V., Zakirov R.Y., Ivanishin P.Z., Kovalkova E.Y., Kozhevnikov O.A., Kukharenko T.A., Mikhaleva T.N., Parfirev D.N., Smolyarov M.V., Khlistun Y.V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (postateynyy) [Scientific and practical comment to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation no. 95-FZ from July, 24, 2002 (article-by-article)]. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/
- Filchenko D.G. Praktika primeneniya polozheniy APK RF o raskrytii dokazatel’stv [Practice of using regulations of Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on proofs disclosure]. Pravo i ekonomika [Law and Economics], 2006, no. 1, pp. 70-77. (In Russian).
- Kayzer Y.V. Dosudebnoye raskrytiye dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Pretrial disclosure of proofs in civil and arbitration process]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 337, pp. 118-121. (In Russian).
- Zdrok O.N. Grazhdanskiy protsess zarubezhnykh stran. Kurs lektsiy. [Civil Procedure of Foreign Countries. Course of lectures]. Minsk, Belarusian State University Publ., 2004, 147 p. (In Russian).
- Nakhova E.A. Sravnitel’no-pravovoy analiz norm o dokazyvanii i dokazatel’stvakh v tsivilisticheskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii [Legal comparative analysis of rules on discovery and evidence in civil and administrative proceedings in Russia]. Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2016, no. 5, pp. 38-42. (In Russian).
- Kuznetsov N.V., Nakhova E.A. K voprosu o printsipe raskrytiya dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve [To the question of the principle of discovery of evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii [Bulletin of Saratov State Academy of Law], 2012, no. 4 (86), pp. 119-124. (In Russian).
- Borbat A.V., Kosheleva M.V. Zloupotrebleniye protsessual’nymi pravami v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Violation of procedural rights in an arbitral procedure]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess – Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 4, pp. 6-9. (In Russian).
- Eliseyev N.G. Raskrytiye dokazatel’stv [Proofs disclosure]. Zakon [Law], 2014, no. 10, pp. 38-44. (In Russian).
- Chekmareva A.V. Podgotovitel’nyye protsedury v grazhdanskom protsesse: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Preparation Procedures in Civil Process. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2015, 438 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files


