Email this article Prejudice and uniform application of legal norms by courts: relationship of concepts in civil and arbitration proceedings
- Authors: RYZHKOV K.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ural Branch of The Federal State Budget-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Russian State University of Justice”
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 235-241
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/303793
- ID: 303793
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Ensuring the uniformity of judicial practice is one of the most important tasks facing the judicial system. At the same time, the existence of a mechanism of prejudice in the procedural legislation raises the question of the ability of the courts to accept not only previously established facts, but also their legal qualification, which is directly related to the issue of the uniform application of legal norms by the courts. The purpose of the study is to identify the relationship between prejudice and the uniform application of legal norms by the courts in civil and arbitration proceedings. To achieve this goal, the task is to distinguish between cases where the court must accept the legal position of the previous court, from cases where the court is free in legal assessments of prejudicial facts. The task was also set to consider various manifestations of the uniform application of legal norms by the courts, as well as their relationship with prejudice. Dialectical, formal-legal and hermeneutical methods were used to achieve the goal and objectives of the study. As part of the study, criteria were formulated for identifying cases where the court must accept the legal position of the previous court. At the same time, the author made conclusions about the relationship and correlation between the legally established requirement for the uniformity of judicial practice and the property of prejudice of judicial acts.
Keywords
About the authors
Konstantin S. RYZHKOV
Ural Branch of The Federal State Budget-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Russian State University of Justice”
Author for correspondence.
Email: knrz2006@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3882-6612
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedural Law
Russian Federation, 63 Energetikov St., Chelyabinsk 454084, Russian FederationReferences
- Amosov S.M. K voprosu o svobodnom pravosudii [To the question of free justice]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 2020, no. 10, pp. 136-140. (In Russian).
- Kleandrov M.I. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i problemy pravosudiya [Scientific and technological progress and the problems of justice]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 14-27. (In Russian).
- Andreyeva T.K. O dopolnitel’nykh mekhanizmakh obespecheniya edinoobraziya sudebnoy arbitrazhnoy praktiki [On additional mechanisms for ensuring the uniformity of judicial arbitration practice]. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation], 2007, no. 7, pp. 72-75. (In Russian).
- Krymskiy D.I. Podkhody k ponimaniyu «edinoobraziya» sudebnoy praktiki po arbitrazhnym delam: kriti-cheskiy vzglyad [Approaches to the understanding of “uniformity” of judicial practice in arbitration cases: a critical view]. Arbitrazhnaya praktika [Arbitration Practice], 2009, no. 11, pp. 51-58. (In Russian).
- Tarasov I.N. K voprosu o preyuditsial’noy svyazi sudebnykh aktov [To a question on a prejudicial connection of judicial acts]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and Civil Process], 2018, no. 7, pp. 41-45. (In Russian).
- Sibileva Y.E. O sovremennykh nauchnykh podkhodakh k ponyatiyu preyuditsii [On modern scientific approaches to the concept of prejudice]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii – Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2013, no. 22. S. 111-114. (In Russian).
- Klinova E.V. O preyuditsial’nosti sudebnogo resheniya [On the prejudicial nature of a judicial decision]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Moscow University]. 2003. № 6. S. 91-98. (In Russian).
- Bezrukov A.M. Preyuditsial’naya svyaz’ sudebnykh aktov [Prejudicial connection of judicial acts]. Moscow, VoltersKluver Publ., 2007, 270 p. (In Russian).
- Byulov O. Ucheniye o protsessual’nykh vozrazheniyakh i protsessual’nyye predposylki [The Doctrine of Proce-dural Objections and Procedural Prerequisites]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2019, 240 p. (In Russian).
- Yastrebov V.M. Otdel’nyye osobennosti unifikatsii pravil preyuditsii v sudoproizvodstve [Certain features of unification of rules of prejudice in legal proceedings]. Sciences of Europe, 2020, no. 50-5 (50), pp. 49-53. (In Russian).
- Matskevich P.N. Preyuditsiya v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [Prejudice in Civil and Administrative Legal Proceedings]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2020, 239 p. (In Russian).
- Orlova E.P. Preyuditsial’nost’ pravovoy otsenki obstoyatel’stv dela: problemy teorii i praktiki [Prejudiciality of legal assessment of the circumstances of a case: problems of theory and practice]. Sovremennyye nauchnyye is-sledovaniya i innovatsii [Modern Scientific Research and Innovations], 2014, no. 1. (In Russian). Available at: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/01/31074 (accessed 12.05.2021).
Supplementary files
