Issues of jurisdiction of disputes for arbitration proceedings. Lithuanian Republic’s legislation analysis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The issues of jurisdiction of civil legal disputes of business entities to arbitration proceedings are analyzed. The institution of commercial arbitration is understood as non-state economic justice. Particular attention is paid to the issues of jurisdiction of arbitration institutions to resolve certain types of disputes. Lithuanian Republic’s legislation and the activities of Lithuanian arbitration institutions are studied. It is argued that this state has formed a fairly developed market economy with a certain trade turnover. Accordingly, commercial arbitration is in demand as a non-state method of resolving economic disputes, both national and international, between business entities. Attention is drawn to the genesis of the legal system of Lithuanian Republic, which was influenced by both the legal system of the former USSR and the modern Russian Federation, as well as the legal systems of Western and Eastern European countries. The industry of commercial arbitration of Lithuanian Republic and the legal regulation of issues of jurisdiction of disputes and the competence of arbitration institutions are examined in detail. Conclusions are formulated on the legislative regulation of issues of jurisdiction of disputes in arbitration proceedings.

About the authors

Vladimir A. GAVRILENKO

Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev; Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: gv22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7357-3526

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Theory and History of State and Law Department; Associate Professor of Civil Law and Process Department

Russian Federation, 149 Moskovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg, 196105, Russian Federation; 41 Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya St., Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian Federation

References

  1. Gavrilenko V.A. (2021). Issues of arbitration proceedings about indemnity damages from emergencies in Arctic region states. Pravo. Bezopasnost’. Chrezvychainye situatsii = Law. Safety. Emergency Situations, no. 2 (51), pp. 10-14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bdgfuv
  2. Gavrilenko V.A. (2007). Treteiskoe razbiratel’stvo sporov [Arbitration of Disputes]. Veliky Novgorod, 166 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxkdgl
  3. Kaufmann-Kohler G., Rigozzi A. (2015). International Arbitration: Law and Practice in Switzerland. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 672 p. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.001.0001
  4. Gavrilenko V.A. (2023). Issues of jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration. Comparative analysis of legislation of BRICS states. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 120-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-1-120-131, https://elibrary.ru/qvgxsj
  5. Gavrilenko V.A. (2023). Issues of jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration. Comparative analysis of legislation of the states of Arctic region. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 303-318. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-2-303-318, https://elibrary.ru/mezpuy
  6. Varapnickas T. (2018). Naujieji Komercinio arbitražo istatymo pakeitimai: kokio efekto tikėtis? Arbitrazas. Teorija ir praktika. Vilnius, no. 4, pp. 19-33. (In Lith.)
  7. Mikelenas W., Necrosius V., Zemlyte E. (eds.). (2016). Lietvos Respublikos Komercinio Arbitrazo Istatymo Komentaras. Vilnius, VJ Registru Center Publ., 192 p. (In Lith.)
  8. Chirich A. (1997). Kompetentsiya kompetentsii mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhei [Competence of competence of international commercial arbitrations]. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh – sostoyanie i perspektivy [International Commercial Arbitration – Status and Prospects]. Belgrade, p. 194. (In Russ.)
  9. Zemlute E. (2014). Valstube Kaip Arbitrazinio Susitarimo Salis. Vilnius, 280 p. (In Lith.)
  10. Zaitsev A.I. (2019). Kommentarii k model’nomu zakonu «O treteiskikh sudakh i treteiskom razbiratel’stve» [Commentary on the Model Law “On Arbitration Courts and Arbitration Proceedings”]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 148 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qcbdkd
  11. Sanders P. (1999). Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice. The Hague, Kluwer Law International Publ., 472 p.
  12. Mikelėnas V. (2016). Lietuvos Respublikos komercinio arbitražo įstatymo dvidešimtmetis: ištakos, taikymo patirtis ir perspektyvos. Arbitrazas. Teorija ir praktika. Vilnius, no. 2, pp. 3-16. (In Lith.)
  13. Zucconi E., Fonseca G., Rasia C. (2015). Arbitrator versus Judge. Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. Interaction of arbitration and courts. New York, Juris Publ., vol. 5. pp. 291-310.
  14. Van Houtte H. (2002). The Law of International Trade. London, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd., 432 p.
  15. Kovaleva N.V., Kuznetsov E.E. (2023). Appointment of examination in civil proceedings under the legislation of the Russian Federation. Pravo. Bezopasnost’. Chrezvychainye situatsii = Law. Safety. Emergency Situations, no. 1 (58), pp. 42-49. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lzyfjg
  16. Sevast’yanov G.V. (2015). Pravovaya priroda treteiskogo razbiratel’stva kak instituta al’-ternativnogo razresheniya sporov (chastnogo protsessual’nogo prava) [The Legal Nature of Arbitration as an Institution of Alternative Dispute Resolution (Private Procedural Law)]. St. Petersburg, 450 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xrxzab
  17. Capper P. (2004). International Arbitration. London, Informa Law from Routledge Publ., 208 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 GAVRILENKO V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).