Institute of complicity in Russian criminal law at the present stage

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The topic of complicity in a crime is considered, the relevance of which is beyond doubt and is confirmed by the statistical data provided, as well as the given coverage of controversial issues related to the stated topic. The object of the study is social relations related to the identification and establishment of responsibility for the intentional joint participation of two or more persons in the commission of a criminal act. The subject of the study was doctrinal approaches to complicity and its forms, the norms of domestic criminal legislation regulating liability for the intentional joint participation of two or more persons in the commission of a crime, as well as the practice of law enforcement of these norms. The purpose of the study involves a comprehensive study of the institution of complicity in a crime in Russian criminal law. The types (perpetrator, organizer, instigator and accomplice) and forms (group of persons without prior agreement, group of persons with prior agreement, organized group, criminal community) of complicity are analyzed. In conclusion, it is noted that the legal nature of complicity is based on the recognition in the doctrine of criminal law of two groups of characteristics – objective and subjective, which are important for determining the quantitative composition of criminals, their intent to commit a crime, and the connection between them.

About the authors

Alexandra S. VASILENKO

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba

Author for correspondence.
Email: vasilenko-as@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4029-8502
Scopus Author ID: 57191278848

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminology Department

Russian Federation, 6 Miklouho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Pinchuk V.I. (2002). Souchastie v prestuplenii [Complicity in Crime]. St. Petersburg, University of Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation Publ., 44 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Shesler A.V. (2022). Specificity of causal connection in criminal complicity. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya = Criminal Justice, no. 19, pp. 33-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/23088451/19/6, https://elibrary.ru/bkdmxu
  3. Shesler A.V. (2014). Souchastie v prestuplenii [Complicity in Crime]. Novokuznetsk, Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Publ., 83 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Bersenev A.A., Miroshnichenko A.V. (2022). The history of the formation and development of forms of complicity in crime in Russian Criminal Legislation and Law. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, no. 5-2 (68), pp. 214-216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2022-5-2-214-216, https://elibrary.ru/jjfpiu
  5. Grudinin N.C. (2022). The institution of complicity in crime in the Russian Criminal Law. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 2, pp. 71-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2022-2-71-74, https://elibrary.ru/gmrhdn
  6. Prozumentov L.M. (2015). Organized criminal group as a form of complicity in a crime under current legislation in Russia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, no. 4 (18), pp. 60-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/18/8, https://elibrary.ru/vavpjd
  7. Piontkovskii A.A. (1961). Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [The Doctrine of Crime in Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 666 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Tel’nov P.F. (1974). Otvetstvennost’ za souchastie v prestuplenii [Responsibility for Complicity in a Crime]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literature Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Kozlov A.P. (2001). Souchastie: traditsii i real’nost’ [Complicity: Tradition and Reality]. St. Petersburg, “Yuridicheskii tsentr Press” Publ., 359 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Kolesnikova T.V. (2010). Sootnoshenie ugolovno-pravovykh i kriminalisticheskikh priznakov organizovannoi prestupnoi gruppy i prestupnogo soobshchestva [The relationship between criminal law and forensic characteristics of an organized criminal group and a criminal community]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, no. 5, pp. 944-952. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/neyfnf
  11. Kisin A.V. (2011). Attributes of an organized criminal group. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, no. 2, pp. 85-90. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nudsov
  12. Nyrkova N.A. (2008). Сriminal association (criminal organization): interpretation of concept and influence on responsibility. Vestnik rossiiskoi tamozhennoi akademii = Vestnic of Russian Customs Academy, no. 3, pp. 75-81. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kcpxrr
  13. Blagov E.V. (2020). Criminal community (crime organization): problems of comprehension. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia, vol. 26, no. 4 (79), pp. 68-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-625X-2020-11011, https://elibrary.ru/pejsdt

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 VASILENKO A.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).