Email this article Issues of jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration. Comparative analysis of legislation of the states of Arctic region
- Authors: GAVRILENKO V.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev
- Sapienza University of Rome
- Issue: Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 303-318
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/303492
- ID: 303492
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We explore the issues of the jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration and the competence of arbitration institutions to consider certain types of disputes. The purpose of work is a complete and objective comparative analysis of legislation of the states of the Arctic region, such as the United States of America, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland. The relevance of the results is that the consideration of disputes in arbitration (referees) as a protection of the rights and interests of economic entities in the scope of the system for identifying states. We conduct a comparative analysis of the peculiarities of the legislation of the states of Arctic region, and also compare and analyze the arbitration practice of various arbitrations. The legal regulation of the issues under study is analyzed and conclusions are drawn about the main problems and shortcomings of legal acts in this area. The results of study can be implemented in law-making work on improving legislation in the field of arbitration of disputes.
About the authors
Vladimir A. GAVRILENKO
Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev; Sapienza University of Rome
Author for correspondence.
Email: gv22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7357-3526
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Theory and History of State and Law Department; Doctoral Candidate of Law Department
Russian Federation, 149 Moskovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg, 196105, Russian Federation; 5 Aldo Moro Sq., Rome, 00185, ItalyReferences
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2007). Treteiskoe razbiratel’stvo sporov [Arbitration of Disputes]. Veliky Novgorod, 166 p. (In Russ.)
- Zykov R.O. (2008). Kommercheskii arbitrazh v Finlyandii [Commercial Arbitration in Finland]. Helsinki, Hannes Snellman Publ., 66 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://arbitrations.ru/userfiles/file/Publications/Publi-cations/Arbitration%20in%20Finland%20Zykov%20Roman.pdf
- Zykov R.O. (2014). Mezhdunarodnyi arbitrazh v Shvetsii: Pravo i praktika [International Arbitration in Sweden: Law and Practice]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 283 p. (In Russ.)
- Andersson F., Isaksson T., Yukhansson M., Nil’sson U. (2014). Arbitrazh v Shvetsii [Arbitration in Sweden]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 304 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://oceanlaw.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Арбитраж-в-Швеции.pdf
- Sundin P., Wernberg E. (2007). The scope of arbitrability under Swedish law. Global Arbitration Review, pp. 63-65.
- Woxholth G. (2013). Voldgift. Oslo, Gyldendal Juridisk Publ., 1239 s. (In Norw.)
- Berg B.H. (ed.). (2006). Voldgiftsloven med kommentarer. Oslo, Gyldendal Akademisk Publ., 534 s. (In Norw.)
- Anisimov A., Gavrilenko V. (2019). Modern problems of arbitration in land disputes. Conflict Studies Quarterly, issue 28, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.24193/csq.28.1
Supplementary files
