Proposals for reforming the civil law protection of artificial intelligence as a single object of intellectual property
- Authors: GOLOVIN K.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 263-274
- Section: Материальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/303485
- ID: 303485
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to propose reforms of the legal protection of artificial intelligence (AI) in Russia, in particular, in relation to the protection of AI as a single object of intellectual property. The study suggests that modernized patent protection is the best way to protect AI rights and results, as patent protection can provide more comprehensive and stronger protection of AI technology rights. The methodology of the work included an analysis of the existing legal and regulatory framework for the protection of AI in Russia and the gaps identification in this context. The author proposes several measures to change the law, including the introduction of patent protection for all AI, the working repository creation versions of AI, and the patent protection term reduction to prevent monopolization. The analysis carried out showed that the existing legal framework for the protection of AI in Russia is inadequate and needs to be reassessed. The current AI protection regime should be expanded to include patent protection, which could encourage investment in AI research and development. Creating a repository of working versions of AI can improve the efficiency of research and development, while solving the “black box” problem inherent in AI. In addition, shortening the patent protection term can prevent monopolization and ensure that AI benefits society as a whole. The theoretical and practical study significance lies in the fact that it proposes changes to the existing legal framework for the protection of AI as an object of intellectual property. The study presents the author’s editions of the following concepts: patent protection of AI, depository of working versions of AI, reduction of the term of patent protection. These proposals can help solve the legal problems associated with the legal protection of AI as an object of intellectual property, and provide adequate protection of rights, promoting innovation and balancing the interests of society as a whole.
About the authors
Kirill S. GOLOVIN
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: golovinks@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-8844-488X
Post-Graduate Student, Private Law Disciplines Department
Russian Federation, 34, B. Cheremushkinskaya St., Moscow, 117218, Russian FederationReferences
- Mishina N.V. (2020). Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on formation of the right of artificial intelligence. Vestnik yuridicheskogo fakul’teta Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Law Faculty, Southern Federal University, no. 2, pp. 98-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23683/2313-6138-2020-7-2-13, https://elibrary.ru/pkeddk
- Hauck R., Cevc B. (2019). Patentschutz für Systeme Künstlicher Intelligenz? Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum, Bd. 11, Heft 2, S. 135-169. (In Ger.) https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2019-0008
- Jin R., Yanisky-Ravid Sh. (2021). Summoning a new artificial intelligence patent model: in the age of pandemic. Michigan State Law Review, vol. 2021, no. 3, pp. 811-860. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3619069
- Arzumanyan A.B. (2021). Artificial intelligence: international issues of legal regulation. Severo-Kavkazskii yuridicheskii vestnik = North Caucasus Legal Vestnik, no. 3, pp. 92-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2021-1-3-92-99, https://elibrary.ru/ieaaqu
- Kirsanova E.E. (2022). Pravovoe regulirovanie oborota prav na rezul’taty intellektual’noi deyatel’nosti v tsifrovoi ekonomike [Legal regulation of the turnover of intellectual property rights in the digital economy]. Moscow, LLC Yustitsinform Publ., 228 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rfcgjq
- Sal’nikov M.Yu. (2021). Practice of IT patenting. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost’ = Intellectual Property. Industrial Property, no. 10, pp. 43-50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uqaatx
- Yanisky-Ravid Sh., Liu Xiaoqiong. (2018). When artificial intelligence systems produce inventions: the 3A era and an alternative model for patent law. Cardozo Law Review, pp. 2215-2263. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2931828
- Schönberger D. (2018). Deep copyright: up- and downstream questions related to artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum, Bd. 10, Heft 1, S. 145-173. (In Ger.) https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2018-0003
- Petit N. (2017). Law and regulation of artificial intelligence and robots – conceptual framework and normative implications. SSRN, 31 p. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2931339 (accessed 03.02.2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2931339
Supplementary files
