The effectiveness of economic justice and its evaluation criteria

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study of problemsrelatedto the implementation of economicjusticein the RussianFederation makes it possible to assessitseffectiveness, to identify the advantages of the leversofjusticeoverlegislativeinstruments for regulatingeconomicprocesses. It is notedthat the purpose of the creation of arbitrationcourtsis to providejudicialprotectionin the economicsphere.Theadvantagesanddisadvantages of the modernjudicialsystemin the economicaspect are analyzed. It is establishedthat the most importantcriteria for evaluating the effectiveness of justice,includingin the economicsphere,are the quality of the administration of justiceandcompliance with proceduraldeadlines. The factorsthatinfluencetheircompliance are analyzed. It isconcludedthat the dominantcriterion for evaluatingeffectivenessis the quality of the administration of justice,determined by the number of cancellations of judicialacts,andcompliance with proceduraldeadlines. The analysis of the indicator of the number of canceledandamendedjudicialactsseemsobjective,sincetheappealedjudicialacts are evaluatedinreasoneddecisions of highercourts.Thesecourtsareinterregional,which is considered an additionalguarantee of theirindependence.

About the authors

Alexander V. KOCHETKOV

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kochetkov@tsutmb.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-9020-6210

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Acting Director of Law and National Security Institute

Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov, 392000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Tikhomirov Yu.A. (1973). The concept of managerial efficiency and the conditions for its achievement. Problemy effektivnosti raboty upravlencheskikh organov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 473 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinskii V.I., Samoshchenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. (1980). Effektivnost’ pravovykh norm. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 280 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wtehut
  3. Lapaeva V.V. (1987). Konkretno-sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya v prave. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 142 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 KOCHETKOV A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).