Email this article Issues of jurisdiction of disputes for arbitration proceedings. Comparative analysis of legislation of Baltic States (Latvian Republic and Estonian Republic)
- Authors: GAVRILENKO V.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev
- Associate Professor of Civil Law and Process Department, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
- Issue: Vol 8, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 117-129
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/297378
- ID: 297378
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The issues of jurisdiction of disputes between economic entities to be solved through the institution of commercial non-state arbitration and the competence of arbitration institutions to consider certain types of disputes are analyzed. As a continuation of the publication in the previous issue of the journal, the arbitration legislation and arbitration practice of the Baltic states of the former USSR, such as the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Estonia, were researched and the activities of local arbitration institutions. There is an influence on genesis of the above states legislation of Soviet and Russian law, as well as the legal traditions of some states of the European Union, especially the countries of Western Europe and Scandinavia. The Baltic republics are characterized by formed market economy at a relatively high level. The institution of commercial arbitration, as a means of resolving economic disputes, is also quite developed and in popular in the legal and economic systems of the above states. This publication analyses the legal issues of arbitrability of disputes in legal systems of Latvia and Estonia, national and international legislation governing these issues. Conclusions have been developed about the main advantages and disadvantages of legal regulation of institution of arbitration in above states.
About the authors
Vladimir A. GAVRILENKO
Saint-Petersburg University State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after the Hero of the Russian Federation, Army General E.N. Zinichev; Associate Professor of Civil Law and Process Department, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: gv22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7357-3526
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Theory and History of State and Law Department; Associate Professor of Civil Law and Process Department
Russian Federation, 149 Moskovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg, 196105, Russian Federation; 41 Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya St., Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian FederationReferences
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2023). Issues of jurisdiction of disputes for arbitration proceedings. Lithuanian Republic’s legislation analysis. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 629-636. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-4-629-636, https://elibrary.ru/dacdqk
- Schinazi M. (2021). The Three Ages of International Commercial Arbitration. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 386 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891837
- Poudret J.-F., Besson S. (2007). Comparative Law of International Arbitration: Second edition. London, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd., 952 p.
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2021). Issues of arbitration proceedings about indemnity damages from emergencies in Arctic region states. Pravo. Bezopasnost’. Chrezvychaynye situatsii = Law. Safety. Emergency Situations, no. 2 (51), pp. 10-14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bdgfuv
- Kaufmann-Kohler G., Rigozzi A. (2015). International Arbitration: Law and Practice in Switzerland. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 672 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1008.8406
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2023). Issues of jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration. Comparative analysis of legislation of the states of Arctic region // Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 303-318. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-2-303-318, https://elibrary.ru/mezpuy
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2023). Issues of jurisdiction of disputes to arbitration. Comparative analysis of legislation of BRICS states. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Current Issues of the State and Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 120-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-1-120-131, https://elibrary.ru/qvgxsj
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2018). Features of arbitration disputes in modern Russia. Pravo. Bezopasnost’. Chrezvychaynye situatsii = Law. Safety. Emergency Situations, no. 2 (39), pp. 18-26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yajsrf
- Kurochkin S.A. (2013). Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh i treteyskoe razbiratel’stvo [International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitration Proceedings]. Moscow, Infotopik Media Publ., 260 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdtywn
- Kurochkin S.A., Morozov M.E., Skvortsov O.Yu., Sevast’yanov G.V. (2010). Treteyskoe razbiratel’stvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Arbitration Proceedings in the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Volters Kluver Publ., 400 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ryrqup
- Zykov R.O. (2014). Mezhdunarodnyy arbitrazh v Shvetsii: pravo i praktika [International Arbitration in Sweden: Law and Practice]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 285 p. (In Russ.)
- Mikelenas W., Necrosius V., Zemlyte E. (eds.). (2016). Lietuvos Respublikos komercinio arbitrazo istatymo komentaras. Vilnius, VJ Registru Center Publ., 192 p. (In Lithuanian)
- Neshataeva T.N., Starzhenetskii V.V. (2000). Treteyskie i gosudarstvennye sudy. Problema prav na pravosudie [Arbitration and state courts. The problem of rights to justice]. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation], no. 10, pp. 85-91. (In Russ.)
- Redfern A., Hunter M., Blackaby N., Partasides C. (2004). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. London, Sweet & Maxwell Publ., 659 p.
- Sanders P. (1999). Quo Vadis Arbitration? Hague, Kluwer Law International Publ., 451 p.
- Benedettelli M.V., Consolo C., Radicati Di Brozolo L.G. (eds.). (2010). Commentario Breve al Diritto dell’Arbitrato Nazionale ed Internazionale. Veneto, Cedam Publ., 1408 p. (In Ital.)
- El Ahdab J., Mainguy D. (2021). Droit de l’arbitrage Théorie et pratique. Paris, LexisNexis Publ., 1062 p. (In Fr.)
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2007). Treteyskoe razbiratel’stvo sporov [Arbitration of Disputes]. Velikiy Novgorod, 166 p. (In Russ.)
- Gavrilenko V.A. (2006). Institut publichnogo poryadka i ego opredelenie [Institute of public order and its definition]. Advokatskaya praktika [Practice of Lawyer], no. 2, pp. 47-48. (In Russ.)
- Kovaleva N.V., Kuznetsov E.E. (2023). Appointment of examination in civil proceedings under the legislation of the Russian Federation. Pravo. Bezopasnost’. Chrezvychaynye situatsii = Law. Safety. Emergency Situations, no. 1 (58), pp. 42-49. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lzyfjg
Supplementary files
