Public relations as a subject of criminal law regulation and an object of social and legal impact
- Authors: MIKAUTADZE S.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lipetsk Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 8, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 85-93
- Section: Материальное право
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-9340/article/view/297193
- ID: 297193
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
A scientific analysis of the issue of the object of legal regulation has been carried out. It is concluded that it is social relations that constitute the subject of criminal law. The conclusion is argued in favor of the point of view of individual scientists that social relations protected by criminal law exist objectively and independently of the latter. Special attention is paid to the issue of the relationship between the categories of criminal law regulation and socio-legal impact on social relations. The author’s position is formulated on the issue of the legal correctness of the term criminal legal impact on social relations, and a conclusion is made about a more correct and preferable phenomenon – social and legal impact, since in real life there is an implementation of the criminal legal norm and the consequences of its impact are not in pure form, but only in the context of the whole variety of social instruments, the totality of actual legal connections and forms of social cognition. The thesis is argued that the commission of a crime as a legal fact causes the emergence of new criminal legal relations, but only to the extent and within the limits of those specific legal connections regarding human rights and freedoms that were violated by this crime. Consequently, the author proposes to talk about the emergence, existence, and functioning of independent criminal legal relations only conditionally, since in each specific case the crime distorts and violates certain socially useful legal relations protected by criminal law.
About the authors
Sergey R. MIKAUTADZE
Lipetsk Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: mikautadze.s@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-0198-5947
PhD (Law), Associate Professor of Criminal Law, Process and Criminalistics Department
Russian Federation, 3 Internatsionalnaya St., 389050, Lipetsk, Russian FederationReferences
- Lyapunov Yu.I. (2005). Ugolovnoe pravo: predmet i metod regulirovaniya i okhrany [Criminal law: subject and method of regulation and protection]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], no. 1, pp. 48-54. (In Russ.)
- Tatsiy V.Ya. (1986). Ob”ekt i predmet prestupleniya [Object and Subject of the Crime]. Moscow, Gosizdat Publ., 212 p. (In Russ.)
- Korzhanskiy N.I. (1980). Ob”ekt i predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany [Object and Subject of Criminal Legal Protection]. Moscow, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR Publ., 248 p. (In Russ.)
- Alekseev S.S. (1999). Pravo: azbuka – teoriya – filosofiya: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya [Law: ABC – Theory – Philosophy: Experience of Comprehensive Research]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 712 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rmlyff
- Pionkovskiy A.A. (1961). Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: Obshchaya chast’ [The Doctrine of Crime in Soviet Criminal Law. Course of Soviet Criminal Law: General Part]. Moscow, Gosizdat Publ., 666 p. (In Russ.)
- Gaukhman L.D. (2001). Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Qualification of Crimes: Law, Theory, Practice]. Moscow, Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 547 p. (In Russ.)
- Nikiforov B.S. (1960). Ob”ekt prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [The Object of the Crime According to Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 229 p. (In Russ.)
- Glistin V.K. (1979). Problemy ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [Problems of Criminal Legal Protection of Public Relations]. Leningrad, Leningrad University Publ., 248 p. (In Russ.)
- Belyaev N.A., Shargorodskii M.D. (general ed.). (1968). Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. Chast’ obshchaya [Course of Soviet Criminal Law. General Part]. Leningrad, Leningrad University Publ., 646 p. (In Russ.)
- Braynin Ya.M. (1963). Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ i ee osnovanie v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [Criminal Liability and its Basis in Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 275 p. (In Russ.)
- Stromov V.Yu. (2016). Questions of criminal-legal theory and law enforcement practice in preventive effect in system of penalties efficiency. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie nauki i pravo = Tambov University Review. Series Politics and Law, issue 1 (5), pp. 66-70. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vsnxsl
- Dvoretskiy M.Yu. (2016). The forms of criminal liability and their types in the context of effective realization. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie nauki i pravo = Tambov University Review. Series Politics and Law, vol. 2, issue 3 (7), pp. 48-56. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uogmbs
- Petrova G.O. (2003). Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie i ego sredstva: norma i pravootnoshenie: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Criminal Legal Regulation and its Means: Norm and Legal Relationship: Dr. habil. (Law) diss. abstr.]. N. Novgorod, 47 p. (In Russ.)
- Rad’ko T.N. (2004). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of Government and Rights]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 359 p. (In Russ.)
- Mikautadze S.R. (2013). The criminal legal prohibition in regulating social relations. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii = Scientific portal of the Russia Ministry of the Interior, no. 4 (24), pp. 10-14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rtezlx
- Matuzov N.I., Mal’ko A.V. (ed.). (2004). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2-e izd. [Theory of Government and Rights. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Yurist” Publ., 585 p. (In Russ.)
- Zharikov Yu.S. (2009). Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie i mekhanizm ego realizatsii [Criminal Legal Regulation and the Mechanism for its Implementation]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 210 p. (In Russ.)
- Alekseev S.S. (1989). Obshchie dozvoleniya i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave [General Permissions and General Prohibitions in Soviet Law]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 286 p. (In Russ.)
- Boyko A.I. (2007). Sistema i struktura ugolovnogo prava: v 3 t. Sistemologiya i strukturalizm v sovremennoy poznavatel’noy kul’ture [The System and Structure of Criminal Law: in 3 vols. Systemology and Structuralism in Modern Cognitive Culture]. Rostov-on-Don, North Caucasus Academy of Public Administration Publ., vol. 1, 508 p. (In Russ.)
- Zhalinskiy A.E. (2009). Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental’nyy analiz [Criminal Law in Anticipation of Change: Theoretical and Instrumental Analysis]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 400 p. (In Russ.)
- Braynin Ya.M. (1967). Ugolovnyy zakon i ego primenenie [Criminal Law and its Application]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 240 p. (In Russ.)
- Mikautadze S.R. (2013). Legal nature of criminal responsibility. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Pravo, no. 2 (15), pp. 422-428. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/repdaf
- Nomokonov V.A. (1989). Prestupnoe povedenie: determinizm i otvetstvennost’ [Criminal Behavior: Determinism and Responsibility]. Vladivostok, Far Eastern Federal University Publ., 157 p. (In Russ.)
- Dvoretskiy M.Yu. (2016). Efficiency of criminal responsibility realization. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie nauki i pravo = Tambov University Review. Series Politics and Law, issue 1 (5), pp. 70-75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vsnxsv
Supplementary files
