Relations between Secular and Religious Mind-set as a Theological Problem: Social Risks, Challenges of Digitization and Establishment of a Civil Dialogue


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The problem of relations between secular and religious beliefs is topical in modern Russian society; its importance is largely determined by the growing internal risks and threats, including extremist and protest movements, the spread of crisis patterns of spirituality, and citizens’ involvement in destructive quasi-religious practices. Preservation of Russia’s spiritual and moral culture is one of the priorities of the national security, a guarantee of national sustainability and stability in the face of the expansion of socio-cultural practices and ideological narratives alien to Russian traditions and values. This study focuses on the search for constructive frameworks for cooperation between the state, religious institutions and society. Research team’s work resulted in the following achievements: identified historical and philosophical perspectives on secularism; justified choice of discourse analysis as a methodological basis for the study of secularism and religiousness; defined the idea of secularism as a complex interrelations of secular and religious worldviews; outlined the boundaries of understanding secularism in the context of theological discourse; identified and described risk areas of public discussions on the role of religion in a modern scientific space; identified negative scenarios of development of relations between the state, church and society; analysed the impact of the digital environment on the attitude of young people to the problems of faith, religion, morality; analysed the vectors of transformation of the boundaries of religiousness and secularity in the digital environment; developed a classification of media sources publishing religious content, described their main strategies, identified potential risks and threats; developed recommendations for public authorities to assess and monitor the Internet environment for destructive religious trends.

About the authors

M. O. Orlov

Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky

Author for correspondence.
Email: orok-saratov@mail.ru

Doctor of Philosophy, Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy, Head of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies

Russian Federation, Saratov

A. V. Ivanov

Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky

Email: ivanowaw@gmail.com

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy

Russian Federation, Saratov

S. A. Danilov

Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky

Email: danilovsa@sgu.ru

Candidate of Philosophy, Head of the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy

Russian Federation, Saratov

References

  1. Beckford J.A. Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  2. Peters L. Religion als diskursive Formation. Zur Darstellung von Religion in der deutschsprachigen Gegenwartsliteratur. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2021.
  3. Von Stuckrad K. Discursive study of religion: from states of the mind to communication and action // Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 2003. № 15(3). P. 255.
  4. Orlov M.O., Ivanov A.V. Diskursivnoe izuchenie religii v postsekulyarnom obshhestve: koncepty i problemy // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta 2022. T. 27. № 1. S. 50–54. (in Russian)
  5. Vystuplenie mitropolita Volokolamskogo Ilariona vo Vserossiyskoi biblioteke inostrannoy literatury // Oficial'nyi sait Moskovskoy patriarhii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi. 2012. 25 aprelja 2012. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/print/2146291.html (Data obrashhenija: 20.07.2023) (in Russian)
  6. Sherkat D. Religious Socialization: Sources of Influence and Influences of Agency // Handbook of the sociology of religion / Ed. M. Dillon. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. R. 151–163.
  7. Sinelina, Yu.Yu. Jetapy izmenenija religioznosti naselenija v Rossii (1989-2006) // Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2009. № 4. S. 77–88 (in Russian).
  8. Chesnokova V.F. Tesnym putem: process votserkovleniya naseleniya Rossii v kontse XX v. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2005.
  9. Baker J. Buster G.S. The nones: Social characteristics of the religiously unaffiliated // Social Forces. 2009. № 87 (3). P. 1251–1263.
  10. Bullivant S. Introducing irreligious experiences // Implicit Religion. 2008. № 11 (1). P. 7–24.
  11. Zuckerman P. Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: New York University Press, 2008.
  12. Woodhead L. Epilogue // Religion and Youth / Ed. S. Collins-Mayo, P. Dandelion. Farnham; Burlington: Ashgate, 2010. P. 239–241.
  13. Shmonin D.V. Yazyk i teologiya v sovremennoy obrazovatel'noy srede // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii «Perspektivy razvitiya i issledovaniy v sfere nauk ob obrazovanii». M.: Izdatel'stvo rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. 2022. S. 525–529 (in Russian).
  14. Shishkov A. Nekotorye osobennosti desekulyariztscii v postsovetskoy Rossii // Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov'. 2012. № 2. S. 165–177 (in Russian).
  15. Orlov M.O. Riski vzaimodeistviya svetskoy i religioznoy kul'tur v cifrovuyu epohu // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika. 2022. T. 22. Vyp. 4. S. 388–392 (in Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Orlov M.O., Ivanov A.V., Danilov S.A.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).