EMOTION AS A COMPONENT OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION (a case study of texts produced by E. D. Polivanov and M. V. Panov)
- Authors: Schepalin M.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow StateLinguistic University
- Issue: Vol 47, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 47-52
- Section: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE. NATIONAL LANGUAGES OF RUSSIA
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-1077/article/view/294548
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2025.1127
- ID: 294548
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of the study is conditioned by the growing interest of domestic and foreign scientists inthe features of cognitive processes, including their affective component. Language data are recognized in some casesas the only key to this kind of knowledge. This study draws on the research papers and letters of two linguists, an orientalistE. D. Polivanov and a Russianist M. V. Panov. The purpose of the study was to identify motives for emotionalreactions indicating the achievement of the result of scientifi c knowledge, to distinguish between the universal and theindividual in such reactions, and to describe the language markers of the affective component of scientifi c research. Theintended goal was achieved using the methods of content analysis, comparative analysis, and stylistic analysis, takinginto account the latest data from neuroaesthetics and cognitive psychology. Conclusions were made about the need toadd the “emotional reactivity/resistance to new knowledge” opposition to cognitive styles, and also about the fact thatin expressing their cognitive emotions scientists are subject to social restraint to varying degrees, that the choice of toneand means of intellectual expression is infl uenced by the addressee factor, and that major scientists experience vivid and diverse emotions when achieving the result of scientifi c research. In addition, linguistic means of expressing cognitive emotion are described in interaction with means of intellectual expression.
About the authors
M. D. Schepalin
Moscow StateLinguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Maksim.Dmitrievich.Sch@yandex.ru
References
- Andronov, A. V., Filatova, D. D. On some of Evgenij Polivanov’s manuscripts in Prague. Polivanov Readings. 2020; 14: 7–12. (In Russ.)
- Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B. The nature of insight. Creativity: science, art, life: Proceedings of all-Russian scientific conference commemorating the 95th anniversary of Y. A. Ponomarev’s birth. Moscow, 2015. P. 53–56. (In Russ.)
- Helmholtz, H. How new ideas come. The psychology of thinking: Anthology. Moscow, 2008. P. 627–628. (In Russ.)
- Danilevskaya, N. V. On the problem of expression in scientific text. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology. 2010; 6(12): 30–36. (In Russ.)
- Danilevskaya, N. V. Expressiveness as a means of conceptualizing new knowledge in a scientific text. Russian speech culture and text. Tomsk, 2018. P. 184–190. (In Russ.)
- Elivanova, M. A., Semushina, V. A. V. S. Ramachandran’s neuroaesthetics law effect in artistic creativity on two prose examples. Ural Journal of Philology. Series “Language. System. Personality: Linguistics of Creativity.” 2021; 2(30): 25–34. (In Russ.)
- Panov, M. V. Works on general linguistics and Russian language. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2004. 568 p. (In Russ.)
- Panov, M. V. Language of Russian poetry of XVIII–XX centuries: Course of lectures. Moscow, 2017. 584 p. (In Russ.)
- Polivanov, E. D. For Marxist linguistics: Collection of popular linguistic articles. Moscow, 1931. 181 p. (In Russ.)
- Polivanov, E. D. Historical linguistics and language policy. Zvegintsev, V. A. History of linguistics of the XIX and the XX centuries in essays and extracts. Part 2. Moscow, 1965. P. 320–337. (In Russ.)
- Polivanov, E. D. Selected works on oriental and general linguistics. Moscow, 1991. 623 p. (In Russ.)
- Polivanov, E. D. Mayakovsky’s rhyme scheme. Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2008; 8: 147–160. (In Russ.)
- Potebnya, A. A. Complete works: thought and language. Moscow, 1999. 300 p. (In Russ.)
- Ramachandran, V. The tell-tale Brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human. Moscow, 2017. 422 p. (In Russ.)
- Rudaeva, Yu. P. Means of expressiveness in scientific discourse. Language. Text. Discourse. 2009; 7: 342–347. (In Russ.)
- Ryabtseva, N. K. “Cognitive emotions”, polymodality of scientific discourse and pragma-aesthetic effects. Cognitive Studies of Language. 2019; 38: 155–162. (In Russ.)
- Linnenbrink, E., Pintrich, P. Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: integrative perspectives on intellectual development and functioning. London, 2004. P. 57–88.
- Wardell, D. M., Royce, J. R. Toward a multi-factor theory of styles and their relationship to cognition and effect. Journal of Personality. 1978; 46(3): 474–505.
- Zajonc, R. B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist. 1980; 35(2): 151–175.
Supplementary files
