NIKOLAY GOLOVIN ON RUSSIA’S PARTICIPATION IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: ORIGINS OF THE INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH
- Authors: Korotkiy A.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- PetrozavodskState University
- Issue: Vol 46, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 8-17
- Section: HISTORIOGRAPHY, SOURCE STUDIES, METHODS OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-1077/article/view/293659
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2024.1003
- ID: 293659
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyzes the views of the Russian military emigrant Nikolay Nikolaevich Golovin on Rus-sia’s participation in the First World War. The analysis tool is the institutional theory, which involves identifying therelationship between the most important public spheres: political, military, economic, and social institutions reflected inhis works, and allows us to evaluate their influence on the nature of the military struggle against the bloc of the CentralPowers. The purpose of the work is to find an answer to the question of how, from Golovin’s point of view, the institu-tions of the Russian Empire in the early XX century determined the possibilities of its military confrontation with itsopponents during the First World War. The author characterizes the main theoretical principles through which the viewsof the Russian military leader were constituted, and demonstrates the influence of domestic military thought, Germanmilitary theory and the sociological ideas of Pitirim Alexandrovich Sorokin on their formation. Characterizing Golo-vin’s evaluations of the aforementioned institutions, the researcher emphasizes the military theorist and practitioner’sdeep understanding of their general inconsistency with the qualitatively new conditions of waging a war which the en-tire country was drawn into. As a result, the author comes to the conclusion that the situation with state, military, social,and economic institutions on the eve of the world conflict described by the former general of the Russian Imperial Armywas a serious obstacle to achieving strategic success in the war. This was due to the fact that the system rooted in thepast forms and, accordingly, functioning well during the previous wars, was completely inconsistent with a new type of war involving an armed people. This logic led the former general to recognize the unresolved contradiction between the old forms of state and a new large-scale type of armed conflict, which eventually caused the revolution.
References
Supplementary files
