Analysis of Russian collective nouns in the aspect of category theory
- Authors: Wang M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Heilongjiang University, China
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 58-64
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2541-8459/article/view/371059
- ID: 371059
Cite item
Abstract
the relevance of the research lies in the fact that in the process of cognition of the world, a person through experience, comparison and generalization forms categories and concepts for ordering complex and multifaceted phenomena, which leads to the emergence of collective nouns. The research goal is to identify the features of collective nouns in the aspect of the theory of categories. The research objectives are to examine the historical evolution of collective noun research using cognitive-linguistic theories such as categorization theory and protocategory theory, to analyze collective nouns in Russian, and to provide their author's classification, and to examine the differences between collective nouns and the generalized meaning of ordinary nouns. The methodology of the research is based on a comparative linguistic approach and includes general scientific methods (formal logical method, comparison, systematization, analysis, synthesis), as well as a number of special methods: historiographical analysis of the scientific discourse of the topic under study; comparative linguistic analysis, part-of-speech analysis. During the empirical study the following results were obtained: in modern scientific discourse, there is a need to identify the reasons for the existence of collective nouns as an independent category in the language.
References
- Вахрушева М.И. Морфотемный анализ собирательных существительных: на материале немецкого и русского языков: автореф. дис. … канд. филолог. наук. Ульяновск, 1999. 28 с.
- Виноградов В.В. Русский язык: Грамматическое учение о слове. М.: Высшая школа, 1986. 158 с.
- Горбунова И.В. Роль суффиксов в образовании собирательных имен существительных // Наука и современность. 2011. № 10-2. С. 55 – 69.
- Дашкова В.Н. Когнитивные основы субстантивной собирательности // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2019. № 6. С. 124 – 156.
- Дашкова, В.Н. Явление собирательности как свойство парадигмы форм числа русского существительного // Вестник ТГУ. 2013. № 3 (119). С. 44 – 58.
- Караулова Ф.В. Концепт «число» в древнерусском языке (на материале памятников ХХІ-ХІІІ веков). Саранск, 2006. 88 с.
- Кубрякова Е.С., Демьянков В.З., Панкрац Ю.Г., Лузина Л.Г. Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. МГУ, 1997. 224 с.
- Лю Синьянь Теория аспектуальности русской школы в фокусе китайской лингвистической школы // Litera. 2022. № 6. С. 66 – 89.
- Шулежкова С.Г. История лингвистических учений. М.: Флинта, 2008. 202 с.
- Armstrong B. Part-of-Speech Analysis of Russian Proverbs: Identifying the Functions of the Noun // Modern Linguistics. 2023. № 10. P. 109 – 113.
- Gross M.A. New Linguistic Paradigm in the Study of Nouns // Oxford Bulletin. 2022. № 4. P. 103 – 118.
- Lass V.M. The Noun and Its Role in the Sentences of Russian, Chinese, and English Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Study // Modern Linguistics. 2022. № 4. P. 123 – 138.
- Narstrom V. Cross-Linguistic Research as a New Scientific Paradigm in Language Study // Humanities. 2024. № 1. P. 79 – 93.
- Sosnowski W. Analytic tendencies in modern Polish and Russian // Cognitive Studies. ?tudes cognitives. 2015. № 1. P. 88 – 92.
Supplementary files
