Problems of Family Law at the Present Stage: Their Influence on the Practice of Applying Norms Aimed at Protecting the Family and Childhood

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Purpose of the study. The article deals with the problems caused by the lack of certainty in the content of the rules of the family type, arising from the insufficient development of the basic categories of family law. Their absence or underdevelopment leads to defects not only in family norms, but also forms an incorrect practice of their application, which does not allow for effective protection of participants in family relations, including children. The author comes to the conclusion that the imperfection of the norms can be eliminated through theoretical research and legislative decisions aimed at enriching the categorical apparatus of family law, as well as through the active use of fictions and presumptions in the field of family relations, which will eliminate the emerging gaps in their regulation and ensure uniform the use of the same terms in meaning, but different in meaning.

作者简介

Natalia Letova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: letovanv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7033-977X

Dr. Sci. (Law), Chief Researcher of the Procedural Law Sector

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Davydova M.L. Definiteness of law and technical and legal means of its provision // Legal paradigm. 2017. V.16. No. 14. P. 23–28.
  2. Trusov N.A. On improving the regulation of certain issues of public authority organization: a critical look at certain issues of technology and content of the draft Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation // State power and local self-government. 2020. N 4. P. 22–25.
  3. Letova N.V. Fundamentals of protection of motherhood, childhood, family in the light of the novels of the Constitution of the Russian Federation // Gaps in Russian legislation. No. 1. 2021. P. 34–40.
  4. Zenkin S.A. Modernization of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: normative model and practice // Lex russica. 2018. N 11. P. 40–62.
  5. Krasheninnikov P.V., Badulina E.V. Support for the institution of the family: constitutional amendments // Family and housing law. 2020. N 4. P. 19–24.
  6. Narutto S.V. To the question of the legal certainty of legislation // Actual problems of Russian law. 2015. No. 11 (60).
  7. Batmanov S.A. The concept of legal uncertainty // Lawyer. 2015. No. 11. P. 20–25.
  8. Vlasenko N.A. Uncertainty in law: nature and forms of expression // Journal of Russian law. 2013. No. 2. P. 32–44.
  9. Makarov S.Y. Strengthening the protection of the family through the protection of parenthood // Advocate newspaper. 07/28/2022/
  10. Mikryukov V.A. On the inadmissibility of the analogy of the law in the mechanism of restricting the rights of adoptive parents // Family and housing law. 2020. N 2. P. 11–14.
  11. Vikharev A.A. The contract as a tool for regulating family relations // Russian legal journal. 2017. N 3. P. 144–152.
  12. Langenbucher K. Argument by Analogy in European Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1998. N 57 (3). P. 481.
  13. Bix B. Agreements in Family Law. 2012 // Minnesota Legal Studies Research. Paper N 12-43 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2125343).


##common.cookie##