Unilateral sanctions and countermeasures in international law: problems of legitimacy and proportionality
- Authors: Sviridova E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 21, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 180-186
- Section: Public Law (State and Legal Sciences)
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2541-8025/article/view/381361
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-6-180-186
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TXAPAN
- ID: 381361
Cite item
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of restrictive measures of the European Union in the context of their compliance with the norms of international law. The purpose of the article is to assess the legality of certain restrictive EU measures in terms of international legal standards. It has been established that the basis for the introduction of restrictive measures is a subjective assessment of the «actual situation» by the EU itself, which gives the EU Council broad discretionary powers. Special attention is paid to the analysis of intellectual property sanctions against the Russian Federation, as well as to the assessment of the proportionality of measures such as asset freezes and broadcasting bans. As a solution, it is proposed to develop legal mechanisms to protect the rights of persons wrongfully affected by sanctions, and to require the EU to strictly comply with the procedural conditions for the use of countermeasures, as well as to assess their humanitarian consequences.
About the authors
Ekaterina A. Sviridova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: ESviridova@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7791-0550
SPIN-code: 9514-6466
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Burdeau G. Le gel d’avoirs étrangers. 1997. JDI. No. 7. Рp. 5–57.
- Daphné D. Les sanctions de l’Union européenne contre les États tiers // Annuaire français de droit international. 2021. No. 67. Рp. 119–142.
- Hofer A. The Developed/Developing Divide on Unilateral Coercive Measures: Legitimate Enforcement or Illegitimate Intervention? Chinese JIL. 2017. Vol. 16, No. 2. Рp. 175–214.
- Paddeu F. Countermeasures. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. 2015. No. 11. Рp. 325.
- SalMon J. Dictionnaire de droit international public. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2001. 1198 p. ISBN: 9-782-80271-520-7.
- Keshner M.V. Issues of the Legitimacy of Restriction by Countermeasures of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the State. Journal of Russian Law. 2021. Vol. 25, No. 3. Рp. 152–171. (In Rus.). doi: 10.12737/jrl.2021.041.
- Shakhnazarov B.А., Shakhnazarovа Е.А. Мain problems of intellectual property protection in sanction environment. Intellectual Property. Industrial Property. 2022. No. 10. Рp. 17–25. (In Rus.). EDN: QRTXTH.
Supplementary files

