Negative Factors of Bologna Process Influence on Russian Higher Education System

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of problematic factors inherent in the Bologna System on the competitiveness of domestic education and human capital development. The analysis of the use of the Bologna system revealed the presence of 10 significant problems. It is shown that the goal of increasing the competitiveness of education in the framework of the Bologna process does not contribute to the growth of such for the Russian Federation as a result of significant differences in the determinants of competition for Western Europe and Russia. The share of specialists with tertiary education in Russia (57%) is much higher than in the European Union (37%), which makes the choice of the Bologna system as a model for the development of education questionable. In contrast to the time when Russia joined the Bologna process, the leaders of economic development are now the largest emerging economies-China, India, etc. This makes it urgent for Russia to leave the closed Bologna system, which focuses on international competition. The key issue of the educational paradigm has not been solved within the Bologna process, which makes it relevant to solve it without burdening it with the norms of the Bologna process. Russia's unequal partnership with EU countries in the framework of the Bologna process facilitates the migration of Russian graduates to Western countries, which has already resulted in losses of 1% of GDP. The materials of the paper can be used for detailed elaboration of changes in the Russian educational system for the future, taking into account the possibilities of increasing its international competitiveness in the field of higher education.

About the authors

Viktor D. Orekhov

International Institute of Management LINK

Email: vorehov@yandex.ru
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Director of the scientific and educational center Zhukovsky, Russian Federation

Elena A. Panfilova

Rostov State University of Economics (RINH)

Email: venize@mai.ru
Cand. Sci (Econ), Associate Professor Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

Olga S. Pricina

Synergy University

Email: olgaprichina@mail.ru
Cand. Sci (Econ), Professor, Professor of the Faculty of Economics Moscow, Russian Federation

Olesya G. Kukharenko

Synergy University

Email: ol.kukharenko@gmail.com
Cand. Sci (Econ), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Economics Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kupriyanov R. V., Vilensky A. A., Kupriyanova N. E. The Bologna process in Russia: specifics and difficulties of implementation. Bulletin of Kazan Technological University, 2014, pp. 412-416.
  2. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The company-creator of knowledge. M.: CJSC «Olympus-Business», 2003. 361 p.
  3. Orekhov V. D. Forecasting the development of mankind, taking into account the factor of knowledge. Monograph. Zhukovsky: MIM LINK, 2015. -210 p. URL: https://world-evolution.ru/monograph/monography.pdf.
  4. Sukiasyan E.R. Library of Congress of the USA, 1996 // Scientific and technical libraries. -1997. -No. 6. -PP. 33-45. URL: http://www.gpntb.ru/win/ntb/ntb97/6/f6_05.html Accessed: 03.05.2021.
  5. Olga S. Prichina, Viktor D. Orekhov, Yulia V. Evdokimova et. al. Evolution of Key Factors and Growth Potential of Human Capital. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) Volume-8 Issue-7, P. 2226-2234, 2019.
  6. Kapitsa S P «The phenomenological theory of world population growth» Phys. Usp. 39 57-71 (1996); doi: 10.1070/PU1996v039n01ABEH000127.
  7. Foerster, H. von, Mora, P. and Amiot, L. Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026. Science 132:1291-5. 1960.
  8. A.V. Korotaev, A.S. Malkov, D.A. Khalturina. The mathematical growth model of world population, economy, technologies and education. -Moscow, 2005.
  9. Michael E. Porter, 1990 Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, a Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
  10. Andryushchenko G.I., Orekhov V.D., Blinnikova А.В. Competitiveness analysis of russia when transition to a multipolar world. Moscow Economic Journal. -2022, No.1. doi: 10.55186/2413046X_2022_01_19.
  11. Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. -2019.
  12. Radhika Desai. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Glozalization and Empire. Pluto Press. -2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183gzc1.
  13. Patnaik, Utsa and Prabhat Patnaik. 2016. A Theory of Imperialism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  14. Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem.
  15. Zimina T. Science and Life. № 8, 2022. Brain drain or talent circulation? URL: https://www.nkj.ru/news/14700/.
  16. Orekhov, V.D. Karanashev, A.Kh., Blinnikova А.В. Dynamics of demand for new professions and costs for the training of specialists in the conditions of the generation of a technological revolution. Moscow Economic Journal. -2021. -No. 8. doi: 10.24411/2413-046Х-2021-10469.
  17. Orekhov V.D., Karanashev A.Kh., Shchennikova E.S. Forecasting Russia’s growth rates, in comparison with the dynamics of the largest economies until the end of the 21st century / V.D. Orekhov, A.Kh. Karanashev, E.S. Shchennikova // Moscow Economic Journal. -2021. -No. 8. -Р. 190-227. doi: 10.24411/2413-046Х-2021-10487
  18. Berezhnova E.V., Kraevsky V.V. The paradigm of science and the development of education // Pedagogy. 2007. No. 1. p. 25.
  19. Pozdnyakov A.S. General fundamentals of pedagogy: abstracts of lectures. Study guide.-Saratov: IC «Science», 2009. 68 p.
  20. Selevko G.K. Modern educational technologies. -M.: Public education, 1998. -256 p.
  21. Creative pedagogy: methodology, theory, practice/Edited by Yu.G. Kruglov. -M.: MGOPU named after M.A. Sholokhov, IC «Alpha», 2002. 240 p.
  22. Serikov V.V. Orientation to personality as a paradigm of modern education. Elista: Enlightenment, 1998.
  23. Burmistrova N.A. Methodological foundations of the competence approach in the conditions of polyparadigmality of the modern educational space. Materials of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference «Education and Science of the XXI century» -2012. Edited by: Milko Todorov Petkov. Ed.: «Byal GRAD-BG», Sofia.
  24. Reason O.S., Orekhov V.D., Schennikova E.S. Professional standards as the core of a new educational paradigm // Socio-political sciences. 2017, No. 5. pp. 46-51. M., Jur-VAK.
  25. Schultheis F., Roca i Escoda M., Cousin P.F. Le cauchemar de Humboldt: Les réformes de l’enseignement supérieur européen. Paris: Liber, 2008. 230 p.
  26. Bikbov A. Declassified plan of the Bologna reform. Russian magazine. №6, 2015. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pushkin/Rassekrechennyj-plan-Bolonskoj-reformy.
  27. Kosorukova I.V., Kukharenko O.G., Orekhov V.D. et. al. Benefits and drivers of inclusive human capital development. Laplage em Revista (International), vol.7, n. 3B, Sept. -Dec. 2021, p. 337-355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-6220202173B
  28. Blinnikova А.В., Kukharenko O.G., Orekhov, V.D., Prichina O.S., et. al. Development of methods and models for analysis and forecasting of socio-economic processes taking into account the human capital factor. Monograph. Zhukovsky: MIM LINK, 2020.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies