Мақаланы E-mail арқылы жіберу Features (De)Professionalization in the Field of Citizen Science
- Авторлар: Rassolova E.N.1, Galkin K.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Шығарылым: № 4(853) (2023)
- Беттер: 129-135
- Бөлім: Социологические науки
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-347X/article/view/349148
- ID: 349148
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
This article examines the features of (de)professionalization of the field of citizen science on the example of citizen science projects in various fields in Russia. The methodological basis of the research is 60 different projects from different fields of civil science conducted in Russia. The material that was analyzed in the framework of the study publications, reports and publications in the media covering the results of these projects.
Авторлар туралы
Elena Rassolova
Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: enrassolova@gmail.com
Junior Researcher
РесейKonstantin Galkin
Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: Kgalkin1989@mail.ru
PhD (Sociology), Senior Researcher
РесейӘдебиет тізімі
- Виргинский В. С. Очерки истории науки и техники XVI–XIX веков (до 70-х гг. XIX в.) М.: Просвещение. 1984.
- Dawson G., Topham J. R. Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical // Literature Compass. 2004. Vol. 1. № 1.
- Сокулер З. А. Знание и власть: наука в обществе модерна. Т. 238. Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во Рус. Христиан. гуманитар. ин-та, 2001.
- Ben-David J. Scientific productivity and academic organization in nineteenth century medicine // American sociological review. 1960. P. 828–843.
- Ben-David J., Collins R. Social factors in the origins of a new science: The case of psychology // American sociological review. 1966. P. 451–465.
- Irwin A. Citizen science and scientific citizenship: Same words, different meanings // Science communication today: Presses Universitaires de Nancy. 2015. P. 29–38.
- Irwin A. No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research // Nature. 2018. Vol. 562. № 7726. P. 480–483.
- Bonney R. et al. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? / R. Bonney, T. Phillips, H. L. Ballard, J. W. Enck // Public understanding of science. 2016. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 1–15.
- Kerr S., Glinow M. A. von, Schriesheim J. Issues in the study of “professionals” in organizations: The case of scientists and engineers // Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1977. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 329–345.
- Larson M. S. The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis // Class: The anthology. 2017. P. 263–286.
- Watson T. Professions and Professionalism-Should We Jump Off the Bandwagon, Better to Study Where It Is Going? // International Studies of Management & Organization. 2002. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 93–105.
- Bettencourt A. The construction of knowledge: A radical constructivist view // The practice of constructivism in science education. Routledge. 2012. P. 55–66.
- Bijker W. E. Understanding Technological Culture through a constructivist view of Science // Technology and Society. Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology and Society Studies /Ed. S. Cutcliffe, H. and C. Mitchan. New York: State University of New York Press. 2001. P. 19–34.
- DeBoer G. E. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform // Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 2000. Vol. 37. № 6. P. 582–601.
- Kronick D. A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals. The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technological Press 1665–1790. New York: The Scarecrow press, 1962.
- Cooper C. Citizen Science. How Ordinary People Are Changing the Face of Discovery. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2016.
- Abel R. L. The rise of professionalism // Brit. JL & Soc’y. 1979. Vol. 6. P. 82.
- Pareto V. The rise of professionalism: Monopolies of competence and sheltered markets. Routledge, 2017.
- Becken S. et al. A hybrid is born: Integrating collective sensing, citizen science and professional monitoring of the environment / S. Becken, M. Rod, Ji. Chen, B. Stantic // Ecological Informatics. 2019. Vol. 52. P. 35–45.
- Hand E. People power: networks of human minds are taking citizen science to a new level // Nature. 2010. Vol. 466. № 7307. P. 685–688.
- Jones, M. G. et al. (2012). Citizen Scientists: Investigating Science In the Community / M. G. Jones, G. Childers, V. & Stevens, B. Whitley // The Science Teacher. 2012. Vol. 79. № 9. P. 54–57.
- Zilliox S., Smith J. M. Colorado’s fracking debates: citizen science, conflict and collaboration // Science as Culture. 2018. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 221–241.
- Gignac F. et al. Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain / F. Gignac, V. Righi, R. Toran, L. Errandonea, R. Ortiz, M. Nieuwenhuijsen, J. Creus, X. Basagaña // Environmental Health. 2022. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 1–13.
Қосымша файлдар
