Sociocultural Risks of Migration: Experience and Perception in the Host Community (using the Republic of Adygea as an Example)
- Authors: Chistyakova O.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
- Issue: No 4(861) (2025)
- Pages: 129-135
- Section: Социологические науки
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-347X/article/view/372421
- ID: 372421
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the processes of socio-cultural risks of migration in the Republic of Adygea. With the increase in migration flows, the intercultural interaction of migrants and the host society acquires additional risks if this society is multicultural and multiethnic, which most Russian regions belong to. The most important tasks facing the current multicultural society are the formation of interethnic tolerance, the realization of its communicative potential and thereby overcoming negative trends in the field of interethnic relations. Due to the growing ethnic and cultural diversity caused by the intensifying migration processes, a scientific rethinking of traditional integration models and the development of new integration strategies for migrants is required. The author considers the multicultural space as a system that captures dynamic interactions and mutual influences, the level of integrativity, intercultural dialogue, the emergence of new forms of identity, values and social practices. Multicultural space in relation to Russian regions is proposed to be understood as the space of a region, which is characterized as a space filled with different ethnic and religious traditions, ethnocultural objects and events, people belonging to different ethnic groups and religions, as well as practices of intercultural and interfaith interaction. Based on a combined methodology (questionnaires, in-depth and expert interviews, content analysis of documents), key trends have been identified in the Republic of Adygea: the predominance of long-term migration strategies (72%), the high educational level of migrants (68%) with a low conversion of their qualifications (83%), as well as the ambivalent attitude of the host community (57% positive ratings with 62% of economic concerns). The results showed that the success of integration depends on the level of trust and support programs at the regional level. The practical significance of the work is determined by the development of a three-level system of recommendations for optimizing migration policy in a multicultural region.
Keywords
About the authors
Olga Aleksandrovna Chistyakova
Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: olga_Melnikova08@mail.ru
Head of the Department of Information Technologies
Russian FederationReferences
- Ravenstein E.G. The Laws of Migration // Journal of the Statistical Society of London. 1885. Vol. 48. Issue 2. P. 167–227.
- Чикагская школа социологии: сборник переводов / под ред. Д. В. Ефременко. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2015.
- Парк Р. Э. Человеческая миграция и маргинальный человек // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Серия 11. Социология. 1998. № 3. С. 167–176.
- Маккензи Р. Экологический подход к изучению человеческого сообщества // Вопросы социальной теории. 2008. Т. 2. № 1. С. 232–246.
- Чистякова О. А. Интеграция мигрантов в поликультурное пространство российских регионов (на примере Республики Адыгея): автореф. дис. ... канд. соц. наук. Майкоп, 2025.
- Бок Ф. К. Культурный шок и адаптация мигрантов // Culture shock: A reader in modern cultural anthropology. 1970. С. 177–182.
- Гольдин Г. Г., Морозова Г. Ф., Осипов А. Г. Миграция и межэтнические отношения в современной России. М.: Наука, 2012.
- Рыбаковский Л. Л. История и теория миграции населения. Кн. 3: Теория трех стадий. М., 2007.
- Zaslavskaya T. I., Rybakovsky L.L. Migration processes and their regulation in socialist society // Sociological Researches. 1978. № 1. P. 56–66.
- Зубок Ю. А., Чупров В. И. Угрозы в трансформирующейся среде обитания как фактор социальных рисков: прогнозирование и регулирование // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 5. С. 57–67.
Supplementary files

