Memoirs of women who survived the Great Patriotic War as a way to preserve historical memory (analysis using the example of a narrative interview with Crimean women)

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article examines the features and problems of integrating young researchers into the scientific community of a modern science city, as well as analyzes the role of urban infrastructure and communication practices in shaping a scientific career. The empirical basis of the research consists of semi-structured interviews with young scientists studying and employed in the science city. A total of 15 interviews were collected. Thematic analysis was used as the main method of analysis, during which two key topics were identified: the importance of urban infrastructure as an environment for scientific activity and the role of communication with the scientific community, ensuring inclusion in the scientific environment. Based on the consideration of these topics, it is concluded that vertical integration into local scientific communities is important for young scientists. In addition, the importance of a well-developed infrastructure and informal communication channels is emphasized as factors contributing to the inclusion of young specialists in the professional scientific community. The article also analyzes the role of research teams in building individual career paths, emphasizing that both the urban environment and local professional communities have a significant impact on the motivation of young researchers to pursue an academic career. Communication within the community plays a key role, providing opportunities for the effective realization of scientific potential.

About the authors

Mariya Nikolaevna Klintsova

V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol

Author for correspondence.
Email: mariya.kats@gmail.com

PhD (Philosophy), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy of Culture, Faculty of Philosophy, Taurida Academy Institute

Russian Federation

References

  1. Мчедлова М. М. Общественная солидарность: проекция исторической памяти // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Сер. 4, История. Регионоведение. Международные отношения. 2013. № 1 (23). С. 85–89.
  2. Anderson K. et al. Beginning where we are: feminist methodology in oral history // Feminist research methods. Exemplary reading in social sciences / K. Anderson, S. Armitage, D. Jack, Wittner J. ; ed. by Joyce McCarl Nielsen. San Francisco ; London: Westview Press, 1990. P. 94—112.
  3. Minister K. A Feminist frame for the oral history interview // A feminist frame for oral history interview // Women’s words. The Feminist practice of oral history / ed. by S.B. Gluck, D. Patai. London: Routledge, 1991. P. 27—41.
  4. Корнякова К. Н., Иванова Т. Н. Опыт практического применения методов устной истории (на примере интервью с ветеранами боевых действий) // Междисциплинарный потенциал устной истории и новые пути развития исторического знания: материалы Междунар. науч. конф. (Чебоксары, 23 апреля 2021 г.). Чебоксары: Среда, 2021.
  5. Линец С. И., Едигарова Г. Н., Гетманова Е. С. Промышленность и продовольствие в годы Великой Отечественной войны (1941–1945) // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2022. № 10. С. 18–21.
  6. Реброва И. В. «Женская» повседневность в проблемном поле истории Великой Отечественной войны // Женщина в российском обществе. 2008. № 2. С. 25–33.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).