Phytotesting as a method for soil quality assessing
- 作者: Soloviev D.1, Fomicheva N.1
-
隶属关系:
- FRC V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
- 期: 编号 2 (2024)
- 页面: 59-63
- 栏目: Farming
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-2082/article/view/255715
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500208224020126
- ID: 255715
如何引用文章
详细
Phytotesting is used for environmental monitoring of soil objects. The purpose of the work is to evaluate phytotesting to determine the quality of artificially created soils. Two samples were examined: Soil 1 with sewage sludge and Soil 2 with pit soil, a small amount of peat and sapropel. Control is soil that ensures free growth of test crops in the natural conditions of a certain soil-climatic zone where it is planned to supply the finished soil. Tests were carried out with seeds of three types of test plants: a monocot – oats (Avena sativa) and two dicotyledons – white mustard (Sinapis alba), creeping white clover (Trifolium repens). They were sown in containers with soil/ground and placed in a climate control system for 14 days (daytime – 20°C, night – 15°C). It was found that in Soil 1 all the studied biometric indicators of oats and white mustard are statistically significantly higher than in the control soil, and the development of creeping white clover is suppressed (wet weight is 8.9 and 2.1 times less compared to the control soil, respectively for seeding rates 10 and 30 g/m2). At the same time, in Soil 1, an excess of the content of gross forms of zinc by 2.5 and copper by 1.4 times was revealed. When testing Soil 2, the biometric indicators of oats and white mustard were at the control level, the wet and dry weight of clover sprouts was 2.9 and 1.7 times higher, respectively. Phytotesting can be considered as a qualitative reaction of the studied soil to plants and an integral indicator of its fertility. A prerequisite is the use of test plants with small seeds. This will allow us to evaluate their response to stimulating and toxic soil components.
全文:
![受限制的访问](https://journals.rcsi.science/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
作者简介
D. Soloviev
FRC V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: 2016vniimz-noo@list.ru
PhD in Agricultural Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowN. Fomicheva
FRC V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
Email: 2016vniimz-noo@list.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Bastaeva G.T., Nesvat A.P., Lyavdanskaya O.A., Sevost’yanov M.A. Perspektivnost’ ispol’zovaniya pochvogruntov na osnove kompostov v gorodskom ozelenenii // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 6 (98). S. 30–37. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2022-98-6-30-37
- Bryndina L.V., Polyanskij K.K., Stazaeva N.V. Primenenie osadka stochnyh vod v kachestve bioudobreniya // Agrarnaya nauka. 2016. № 4. S. 2–3.
- Grekhova I.V., Grekhova V.Yu., Mihajlovskaya A.A., Privetkina N.Yu. Primenenie osadka stochnyh vod v sostave gruntov // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 2015. № 1 (61) T. 2. S. 16–19.
- Zolotarevskij A.A., Prokopovich I.I. O perspektivah primeneniya rastitel’noj zemli na osnove kompostov iz drevesno-rastitel’nyh ostatkov v gorodskom ozelenenii // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa. Lesnoj vestnik. 2015. T. 19. № 5. S. 132–136.
- Lisovickaya O.V., Terekhova V.A. Fitotestirovanie: osnovnye podhody, problemy laboratornogo metoda i sovremennye resheniya // Doklady po ekologicheskomu pochvovedeniyu. 2010. T. 1. № 13. S. 1–18.
- Nikolaeva O.V., Chistova O.A., Panina N.N., Rozanova M.S. Ekotoksikologicheskaya ocenka pochv pridorozhnyh territorij Leningradskogo shosse metodom laboratornogo fitotestirovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 17: Pochvovedenie. 2019. № 1. S. 28–34. doi: 10.3103/s0147687419010083
- Terekhova V.A., Voronina L.P., Kiryushina A.P. i dr. Standartnyj algoritm izmerenij fitoeffektov: uchebnoe posobie. M., 2021. 58 s. ISBN 978-5-9909558.
- Terekhova V.A., Rahleeva A.A., Fedoseeva E.V., Kiryushina A.P. Praktikum po biotestirovaniyu ekologichnosti pochv: uch pos. M.: MAKS Press, 2022. 102 s. ISBN 978-5-317-06868-4. doi: 10.29003/m3054.978-5-317-06868-4
- Tishin A.S., Tishina Yu.R. Metody i sposoby fitotestirovaniya pochv: obzor // Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal. 2021. № 11-2 (113). S. 93–98. doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.113.11.052
- Chebotarev N.T., Najdenov N.D., Yudin A.A. Agroekologicheskaya ocenka primeneniya osadkov stochnyh vod v kachestve udobrenij sel’skohozyajstvennyh kul’tur // Nauka. Mysl’: elektronnyj periodicheskij zhurnal. 2016. T. 6. № 1-2. S. 31–36.
- Shcherbakov A.Yu., Karev S.Yu., Abramcev V.S. i dr. Voprosy podgotovki i kontrolya kachestva iskusstvenno sozdannyh gruntov dlya ozeleneniya moskovskih gazonov // Ekologicheskie sistemy i pribory. 2012. № 10. S. 28–33.
- Eremchenko O.Z., Mitrakova N.V., Moskvina N.V. Phytotesting of the soils of urban pedocomplexes in residential areas of Perm, Russia // Аpplied ecology and environmental research. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 2. Pp. 3179–3197. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1702_31793197
- Fomina N.V. Phytotesting and environmental assessment of soil in the greenhouse complex. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Volgograd, Krasnoyarsk. 2020. Vol. 548. P. 022081. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022081
- Kravsun T.I. Phytotesting of heavy metal contamination of Donbass soils // Diversity of plant world. 2020. No. 3 (6). Pp. 37–44. doi: 10.22281/2686-9713-2020-3-37-44
![](/img/style/loading.gif)