The economic war between the USA and China in the agricultural sector as a reflection of their rivalry for global leadership
- Authors: Minakova I.V.1, Rastorguev A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 184-202
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0684/article/view/368949
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ORRMZS
- ID: 368949
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The economic confrontation that began in 2018 represents a new stage in Sino-American trade relations. We focus on the conflict between China and the USA, as they are the largest players in the global agricultural market while also being each other's most important trade partners. Given their economic power, their trade policies can significantly impact global commodity markets. The aim of the study is a comprehensive analysis of the origins of disagreements and the current state of foreign trade interactions between the USA and China in the agricultural sector. The object of research is the totality of Sino-American relations related to the trade of agricultural products in the context of growing confrontation between the countries at the beginning of the 21st century. The subject of research is the features of trade and economic interaction between the USA and China in the agricultural sector against the backdrop of the increasing financial and economic power of China. The authors implemented a systematic approach to the study of trade and economic relations between the USA and China, identifying patterns and trends in the development of bilateral relations. The methodological basis of the study includes structural-functional analysis, comparative-historical analysis, and institutional analysis. To reveal the essence of each party's positions in the trade war, a content analysis of the speeches of both leaders was conducted. Despite opposing interests and developmental trajectories, China and the USA maintain longstanding agricultural relations that have steadily strengthened in recent years. There is a complementarity in trade between them: the USA exports goods that require significant land and capital investment, while China exports goods that require high labor input. From a purely commercial standpoint, these exchanges are beneficial for both countries: they allow the USA to find markets for its products and provide China with the resources necessary to feed its population. The existing interdependence between the two countries in the trade of agricultural products makes the use of agriculture for geoeconomic purposes within the framework of the trade war both simple and dangerous. The authors have systematized the stages of the trade war between the USA and China. It is argued that the increased trade balance deficit of the USA was one of the factors contributing to the confrontation between the countries. The strategies of both countries within the framework of the trade war are elucidated.
About the authors
Irina Vyacheslavna Minakova
Email: irene19752000@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6838-7940
Anton Andreevich Rastorguev
Email: guimo-swsu@yandex.ru
References
Copeland B.R. Efficiency wages in a Ricardian model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 1989, vol. 27, no. 3-4, p. 221-244. EDN: HISUOH. Matsuyama K. Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 1992, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 317-334. EDN: HIPMON. Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, 1993. Lawrence R.Z. Can the trading system survive US-China trade friction? China & World Economy, 2018, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 62-82. Li Ch., He Ch., Lin Ch. Economic impacts of the possible China-US trade war. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2018, vol. 54, no. 7, p. 1557–1577. Guo J., Huang Q., Cui L. The impact of the Sino-US trade conflict on global shipping carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 316, p. 128381. Itakura K. Evaluating the impact of the US-China trade war. Asian Economic Policy Review, 2020, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 77-93. Raess D., Dür A., Sari D. Protecting labor rights in preferential trade agreements: The role of trade unions, left governments, and skilled labor. The Review of International Organizations, 2018, vol. 13, p. 143-162. doi: 10.1007/s11558-018-9301-z. EDN: BQEPYO. Rodrik D. Populism and the economics of globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017. Dür A., Eckhardt J., Poletti A. Global value chains, the anti-globalization backlash, and EU trade policy: A research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 2020, vol. 27, no. 6, p. 944-956. Bown Ch.P., Crowley M.A. Trade deflection and trade depression. Journal of International Economics, 2007, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 176-201. Lv J., Zhang S., Qiu C. A study of the export deflection effect of US trade frictions with China: Evidence from monthly data from 2009–2021. Econ. Sci, 2023, vol. 5, p. 55-78. Wang X., Ni H. Welfare loss measurement of China-US economic and trade friction based on bilateral import demand elasticity. World Econ, 2019, vol. 42, p. 27-50. Cui K., Shi J. Intermediate goods trade, inflation targeting rules and welfare analysis under tariff shocks. World Econ, 2020, vol. 43, p. 169-192. Liu L., Jiang Y., Zhang B. Study on the price correlation of agricultural products between China and "Belt and Road" countries: Analysis of the impact of trade friction between China and the United States. Agric. Econ. Issues, 2021, vol. 495, p. 126-144. Feenstra R., Hong Ch. China's import demand for agricultural products: The impact of the Phase One trade agreement. Review of International Economics, 2022, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 345-368. Merchandise trade balance in China from 2014 to 2024. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263632/trade-balance-of-china/ (дата обращения: 17.06.2025). Balance of trade in agricultural products in China 2005–2024. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1301293/china-balance-of-trade-in-agricultural-products/#:~:text=In%202024%2C%20China's%20balance%20of,over%20the%20last%20two%20decades (дата обращения: 27.07.2025).
Supplementary files
