Tax Constitutionalism in the Context of the Transformation of the Paradigm of Constitutionalism: Contradictions, Trends, and Prospects for Institutionalization at National and Supranational Levels

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

One of the least studied yet simultaneously key aspects of the constitutionalism transformation is the phenomenon of tax constitutionalism. In the context of growing fiscal pressure, asymmetry of tax regimes, and the increasing supranational influence on tax policy, the question of the limits of permissible state intervention in citizens' economic freedom from the perspective of the constitution becomes more acute. Historically formed as a form of expression of the social contract and legitimization of public authority through taxation, tax constitutionalism acquires new significance in the era of the crisis of representative democracy and the rise of executive discretion. The subject of this research is the constitutional and legal foundations, law enforcement practices, and prospects for the institutionalization of tax constitutionalism in the context of the transformation of foundational principles of modern constitutional order. The methodological basis of the study is a systemic approach, which implies considering tax constitutionalism as a complex legal institution located at the intersection of public and constitutional law. Comparative legal, axiological, and institutional methods of analysis are applied to identify the evolution of norms and mechanisms of tax legitimization in various jurisdictions. The scientific novelty of the research consists in substantiating tax constitutionalism as an independent concept reflecting the adaptation of constitutional order principles to new challenges of public governance. The article makes the first attempt to systematize the characteristics and models of tax constitutionalism, taking into account the differences between national and supranational fiscal systems. The author shows that modern tax constitutionalism implies not only compliance with formal procedures but also the realization of values of justice, proportionality, and fiscal sustainability. The necessity of constitutional oversight over fiscal innovations, including digital taxes, climate fees, and platform taxation regimes, is substantiated. It concludes that the further development of tax constitutionalism is only possible under conditions of institutional consolidation of mechanisms for public participation and legal transparency. Overcoming existing contradictions requires the development of balanced models of fiscal sovereignty that are compatible with the principles of constitutional identity. The research aims to develop the theory of adaptive constitutionalism as a foundation for a sustainable tax order in the 21st century.

About the authors

Sergei Yur'evich Poyarkov

Email: psu70@bk.ru

References

  1. Васянина Е.Л. Цифровая трансформация фискального администрирования: проблемы и перспективы правового регулирования // Налоги. 2023. № 2. С. 28-31.
  2. Daunton M. Creating Legitimacy: Administering Taxation in Britain, 1815–1914. In: Cardoso JL, Lains P, eds. Paying for the Liberal State: The Rise of Public Finance in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Cambridge University Press; 2010. Р. 27-56.
  3. Jaakkola J. A Democratic Dilemma of European Power to Tax: Reconstructing the Symbiosis Between Taxation and Democracy Beyond the State? German Law Journal. 2019. № 20(5). Р. 660-678.
  4. Угрюмов Е.С. Принцип справедливости налогообложения как основа проведения социальной политики государства // Политика, государство и право. 2014. № 1 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://politika.snauka.ru/2014/01/1179 (дата обращения: 18.07.2025). EDN: RUCTQP
  5. Гребенчук А.О. Налоги как инструмент социального взаимодействия органов государственной власти и общества // Социология власти. 2008. № 5. С. 75-84. EDN: JUHVCP
  6. Debrun X., Kinda T., Curristine T., Eyraud L., Harris J., Seiwald J. The functions and impact of fiscal councils. 2013. 10.13140/RG.2.1.2733.7447.
  7. Fasone С. Do Independent Fiscal Institutions Enhance Parliamentary Accountability in the Eurozone? Politics & Governance. 2021. № 9(3). P. 135-144.
  8. Glogower A. The Constitutional Limits to the Taxing Power. Fordham Law Review. 2024. № 93(3). P. 781-842.
  9. Осина Д.М., Дворецкий В.М. Понятие и пределы фискального (налогового) суверенитета государства // Налоги и налогообложение. 2019. № 3. С. 1-8. doi: 10.7256/2454-065X.2019.3.29138 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29138
  10. Ильин И.М. Суверенная фискальная политика России как конституционно-определяющий фактор достижения её суверенитета в бюджетно-финансовой сфере // Современный ученый. 2021. № 2. С. 303-307. EDN: RUSUMD
  11. Kassen M. Open Data Governance and Its Actors: Theory and Practice. 2022. 161 р.
  12. Поярков С.Ю. Адаптивный конституционализм: концептуальные основания и институциональные механизмы в условиях политико-правовой турбулентности // Административное и муниципальное право. 2025. № 3. С. 67-85. doi: 10.7256/2454-0595.2025.3.74695 EDN: OYYMQE URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=74695
  13. Savoia A., Sen K., Tagem A.M.E. Constraints on the executive and tax revenues in the long run. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2023. № 19(3). Р. 314-331. doi: 10.1017/s1744137422000492 EDN: WADAJQ
  14. Rogan M. Tax Justice and the Informal Economy: A Review of the Debates. WIEGO Limited. 2015.
  15. Bird R.M., Zolt E.M. Introduction to Tax Policy Design and Development, Draft Prepared for a Course on Practical Issues of Tax Policy in Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington D.C. 2003.
  16. Pistone P. (ed.). European Tax Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. IBFD, 2018. 748 р.
  17. Murphy R. The European Tax Gap. A report for the Socialists and Democrats Group in the European Parliament. 2019. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.socialistsanddemocrats.eu/sites/default/files/2019-01/the_european_tax_gap_en_190123.pdf (дата обращения: 18.07.2025).
  18. Fung S. The Questionable Legitimacy of the OECD/G20 BEPS Project. Erasmus Law Review. 2017. № 10(2). Р. 76-88.
  19. Golia A.J. Taxing data as an instrument of economic digital constitutionalism: elements for a normative agenda. European Law Open. 2024. № 3(4). Р. 865-889.
  20. Kantorowicz J. Testing public reaction to constitutional fiscal rules violations. Constitutional Political Economy. 2022. № 34. Р. 483-509.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).