Features of the excise tax on the pharmaceutical ethanol: current issues
- Authors: Sekushin A.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 19-33
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-065X/article/view/361018
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ANEVTY
- ID: 361018
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the study is the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol, various aspects, features in the implementation of the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol. The purpose of the study is to analyze the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol, identify problems based on the analysis of the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol, and propose directions for the development of the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol for the purposes of harmonization of legislation. The author examines in detail such features of the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol as: lists of pharmaceutical products, the object of taxation of excise tax, the application of various rates when performing operations with the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol, the specifics of the application of deductions for this excise tax, as well as other issues. This study was conducted based on the application of general scientific research methods, including systematic, logical, comparative analysis, and the method of analogy. The main conclusions of the study are that this tax is aimed at controlling the misuse of medical alcohol in the production of alcoholic beverages, imposing excise taxes on such production in order to equalize its value. As part of the implementation of the new mechanism, pharmaceutical companies face an additional administrative burden regarding the need to confirm the intended use of the pharmaceutical substance ethyl alcohol. At the same time, the author highlights an urgent problem for the excise tax on the pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol, which is an additional tax burden in the case of the purchase of more than 500,000 thousand liters of pharmaceutical substance of ethyl alcohol for the production of medicines that are not included in the lists of pharmaceutical products. The scientific novelty lies in the refinement of a new approach to state regulation of excise taxation, based on a detailed analysis of legislative norms and rules, as well as an assessment of the effects of their impact on the pharmaceutical industry.
References
Алабердеев, Р. Р. Вопросы противодействия незаконному обороту алкогольной и спиртосодержащей продукции / Р. Р. Алабердеев, Р. Ю. Погорелов // Государственная служба и кадры. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 123-125. – EDN YPXUUX. Лошаков, А. С. Государственное регулирование рынка алкогольной продукции в системе обеспечения национальной безопасности страны / А. С. Лошаков, В. В. Перепечин // Форум. – 2021. – № 2(22). – С. 223-226. – EDN OCKBQY. Leon G. et al. The 30-Billion-Dollar Distribution Markups and Taxes of Pharmaceuticals in Latin American Countries: Impact, Options, and Trade-Offs //Value in Health Regional Issues. – 2024. – Т. 44. – С. 101015. Kanavos P. et al. Latin America healthcare system overview: a comparative analysis of fiscal space in healthcare. – 2019. Cepal N. U. Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020: Main conditioning factors of fiscal and monetary policies in the post-COVID-19 era. – ECLAC, 2020. Chen M. T., Feliciano Z. M. Intangible assets, corporate tax credits and pharmaceutical establishments // Emerging Markets Review. – 2024. – Т. 60. – С. 101141. Маркс К. Капитал. В 4 т. / К. Маркс. М.: Политическая литература, 1978. Том 3, кн. 3, ч. 1. 508 с. Дубкова, В. Б. Концепция дифференцированного метода налогообложения прибыли предприятий / В. Б. Дубкова // Экономика: теория и практика. – 2024. – № 2(74). – С. 50-65. – doi: 10.31429/2224042X_2024_74_50. – EDN RQALXL. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. Evaluation of Russian Economic Sectors’ Sensitivity to Tax Burden // Journal of tax reform. – 2020. – Т. 6. – №. 2. – С. 157-179. Morgan A. L. K., Moran D., Van Boeckel T. P. Taxation of veterinary antibiotics to reduce antimicrobial resistance // One Health. – 2023. – Т. 17. – С. 100650. Гущина, И. Э. Возмещение НДС: общий и заявительный порядок / И. Э. Гущина, С. М. Гаджиев // Финансовый вестник: Финансы, налоги, страхование, бухгалтерский учет. – 2021. – № 9. – С. 35-41. – EDN WEJMKV. Протасова, И. И. Организация системы налогообложения и налогового контроля НДС в цифровой экономике / И. И. Протасова // Налоги и налогообложение. – 2024. – № 1. – С. 31-43. – doi: 10.7256/2454-065X.2024.1.38960. – EDN QNKWEO. Свистунов, А. В. Повышение эффективности надзорной деятельности налоговых органов / А. В. Свистунов, А. В. Климова // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. – 2018. – Т. 5. № 5. – С. 169-173. – EDN XTTHRB. Harkushenko, O. N. Prospects of VAT Administration Improvement in Digitalized World: Analytical Review / O. N. Harkushenko // Journal of Tax Reform. – 2022. – Vol. 8, No. 1. – P. 6-24. – doi: 10.15826/jtr.2022.8.1.105. – EDN LYTAYQ. Онищенко, Н. А. О преимуществах и недостатках налогового мониторинга как формы налогового контроля / Н. А. Онищенко // Epomen. Global. – 2023. – № 36. – С. 83-89. – EDN ZAMIAW. Жирова, Г. В. Преимущества налогового мониторинга / Г. В. Жирова, К. Э. Багдасарова, А. С. Мулдагалиева // Экономика и социум. – 2022. – № 4-2(95). – С. 829-831. – EDN YGCUGS.
Supplementary files
