"Jus cogens" and constitutional law: Transformation of the hierarchy of norms and institutions in the context of global law and order

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Modern constitutional law is faced with the need to rethink the traditional hierarchy of norms in the context of the transnationalization of legal regulation. The leading challenge to the classical model of law and order is the integration of jus cogens norms, peremptory norms of international law that have the highest legal force and universal obligation. These norms begin to play the role of a kind of transcendent criterion that affects the limits of the permissibility of both legislation and constitutional reforms. This problem is particularly acute in countries with a formalized doctrine of the supremacy of the constitution, where jus cogens begins to compete with fundamental national norms. The appeal to them in the practice of constitutional courts and international instances demonstrates a shift from a vertically sovereign to an axiologically oriented model of law. The examples of Germany, Italy, France, and Colombia indicate the emergence of more flexible, polycentric legal structures in which jus cogens is interpreted as an integral part of the constitutional order. The subject of the study is the transformation of the hierarchy of legal norms and institutions under the influence of jus cogens in the context of the emerging global legal order. The methodological basis of the research includes legal hermeneutics, axiological analysis and a comparative legal approach. These methods make it possible to identify how the structure and logic of constitutional regulation is changing in the context of the interaction of national and international law. An institutional approach has also been applied to evaluate regulatory conflict resolution mechanisms. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the interpretation of jus cogens not only as an international category, but also as the axiological limit of national lawmaking. In the context of the erosion of the classical normative pyramid, a post-hierarchical model is being formed, in which jus cogens becomes a normative reference point that does not fit into the previous framework of sovereignty. This requires not the abandonment of national constitutionalism, but its conceptual renewal. The conclusions of the study are focused on the development of the idea of a legal dialogue between different levels of normativity, including the possibility of quasi-constitutional coexistence of jus cogens and national foundations. It has been established that models allowing for such coordination are already being implemented in a number of legal systems. The proposed concept can be used as a basis for further doctrinal and institutional transformations. The article contributes to the formation of a new ontology of global constitutionalism.

References

  1. Koskenniemi M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 704 p.
  2. Исполинов A. С. Нормы jus cogens в решениях международных и национальных судов // Российский юридический журнал. 2014. № 6. С. 7-14. EDN: TEKTST
  3. Кремнев П. П. Общепризнанные принципы и нормы jus cogens и обязательства erga omnes: юридическая природа и иерархия в российской правовой системе // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право. 2021. Т. 12. № 3. С. 783-802. doi: 10.21638/spbu14.2021.318 EDN: LRQQZF
  4. Ануфриева Л. П. Конституция РФ и международное право: теоретический взгляд на понятия "общепризнанные принципы и нормы международного права" и jus cogens // Lex Russica (Русский закон). 2018. № 12 (145). С. 37-47. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.145.12.037-047 EDN: YRVHPV
  5. Venkatachalam M. M. Jus Cogens v. State Sovereignty: The Battle of Discriminatory Citizenship Laws // Harvard International Law Journal. Dec 8. 2023.
  6. Sellers P. Jus Cogens: Redux. AJIL Unbound. 2022. Vol. 116. P. 281-286. doi: 10.1017/aju.2022.47 EDN: PJAOLC
  7. d'Aspremont J., de Brabandere E. The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise. Fordham International Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 34. P. 190-235.
  8. Капустин А. Я., Бальхаева С. Б. Конституция и международное право: новая модель взаимодействия // Lex Russica (Русский закон). 2022. Т. 75. № 4 (185). С. 117-127. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2022.185.4.117-127 EDN: VQMQFN
  9. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law (Reine Rechtslehre). 1960.
  10. Krisch N. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford University Press, 2010. 384 p.
  11. Klabbers J., Peters A., Ulfstein G. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford University Press, 2009. 414 p.
  12. Talmon S. Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy: Substantive and Procedural Rules Distinguished. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2012. Vol. 25(4). P. 979-1002.
  13. Pivoda M. Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2023. Vol. 25. P. 141-160.
  14. Petersmann E.-U. International Economic Law in the 21st Century: Constitutional pluralism and multilevel governance of interdependent public goods. Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2012. 540 p.
  15. Dupuy P.-M. Le "jus cogens", les mots et les choses: où en est le droit impératif devant la Cour Internationale de Justice près d'un demi-siècle après sa proclamation? In: Mélanges offerts à Charles Leben: droit international et culture juridique. Paris: Pedone, 2015. P. 77-99.
  16. Поярков С. Ю. Адаптивный конституционализм: концептуальные основания и институциональные механизмы в условиях политико-правовой турбулентности // Административное и муниципальное право. 2025. № 3. С. 67-85.
  17. Uprimny Y. R. El bloque de constitucionalidad en Colombia. Un análisis jurisprudencial y un ensayo de sistematización doctrinal. Ius Inkarri. 2021. Vol. 3(3). P. 115-148.
  18. O'Connell M. E. Jus Cogens: International Law's Higher Ethical Norms. In: Childress, III D. E., ed. The Role of Ethics in International Law. ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2011. P. 78-98.
  19. Shelton D. Jus Cogens: Elements of International Law. OUP Oxford, 2021. 144 p.
  20. Lusted M. Treaties, Peremptory Norms and International Courts: Is the Hierarchy Theory Treading Water? // LSE Law Review. 2020. Vol. 5. P. 209-218.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).