New forms of intervention in the freedom of beliefs: international legal doctrine in the context of digital transformation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article explores new forms of interference with freedom of beliefs arising in the context of digital transformation from the perspective of international law. Special attention is given to the analysis of changes in the understanding of forum internum—the internal sphere of beliefs, which is subject to absolute protection under international standards. The author examines the impact of digital technologies—behavioral analytics, personalization algorithms, mass surveillance, neuro-technologies, and emotion recognition systems—on an individual's ability to freely form and maintain their beliefs. Based on an analysis of doctrine, the practices of international bodies, and recent recommendations, it is revealed that the existing international legal system faces the necessity of adapting to new risks associated with artificial intelligence and digital oversight. The subject of the research is international legal standards and the doctrine of freedom of beliefs; the object is new forms of digital intervention and the reactions of international bodies and the scientific community. The work argues for the need to introduce new categories such as cognitive freedom and mental autonomy and suggests directions for improving international mechanisms for the protection of freedom of beliefs. The methodological foundation of the research includes comparative legal, formal legal, systemic, and structural-functional methods, as well as case analysis of decisions made by international bodies. Materials from UN reports, the "neuro-rights" doctrine, and developments in cognitive freedom have been used. For the first time in the scientific literature, a comprehensive analysis of digital threats to the forum internum as an international legal category is conducted. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the comprehensive international legal analysis of digital threats to freedom of beliefs and the justification of the need to develop a new category – “cognitive rights” – as a response to the challenges posed by AI and algorithmic oversight. The scientific approach and the practice of international bodies are already laying the groundwork for a new doctrine—the doctrine of protecting freedom of thought in the digital world. Its implementation will require efforts at both the universal and national levels, a revision of legislation, and the development of cooperation between states and technology companies. Approaches to clarifying the content of the forum internum in the context of the digital age are proposed.

References

  1. Научно-практический комментарий к Федеральному закону "О свободе совести и о религиозных объединениях" (постатейный) / Авт. колл.: Шахов М.О., Чернега О.А., Ряховский В.В., Вагина Т.В., Себенцов А.Е. и др.; под общ. ред. Маранова Р.В. – М.: Славянский правовой центр, 2011. – 624 с.
  2. Коккинакис против Греции – Kokkinakis v. Greece, ECtHR, Judgment of 25 May 1993 // Reports 1993. Series A, no. 260-A.
  3. Shaheed A. Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief: Freedom of Thought. U.N. Doc. A/76/380 (5 Oct 2021).
  4. Alegre S. Rethinking Freedom of Thought for the 21st Century. – European Human Rights Law Review, 2017, No. 3, pp. 221-233.
  5. Guzmán L. Chile: Pioneering the protection of neurorights // The UNESCO Courier, 21 March 2022.
  6. Alegre S. Protecting Freedom of Thought in the Digital Age // CIGI Policy Brief. 2021. No. 165. 7 p.
  7. EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act, 18 June 2021.
  8. Access Now. Submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief: Freedom of Thought in the Digital Age (2021).
  9. Alegre S. Regulating around freedom in the 'forum internum' // ERA Forum. 2020. Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 511-527.
  10. Alegre S. Toward an International Agenda to Protect the Forum Internum // CIGI Policy Brief. 2022. No. 176. 8 p.
  11. Alegre S. Freedom to Think: The Long Struggle to Liberate Our Minds. London: Atlantic Books, 2022. 320 p.
  12. Rafael Yuste, Tomás de la Quadra-Salcedo, Miguel García Fernández. Neuro-Rights and New Charts of Digital Rights: A Dialogue Beyond the Limits of the Law // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Indiana University Press. Volume 30, Issue 1, 2023. pp. 15-37.
  13. Ligthart S. et al. Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights' // Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. – 2023. – Publ. online 15 May. – P. 1-21. – doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000245. EDN: HOIJVM.
  14. Spichak S. The Controversial Push for New Brain and Neurorights / Spichak S. // JMIR Publications. – 2025. – Vol. 27, J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72270.
  15. Klosek J., Tene O., Krystal L. Colorado's Neural Privacy Law: A Game Changer for Tech / Goodwin Law. – 2024. – 25 September. – URL: https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2024/09/insights-technology-dpc-colorados-neural-privacy-law-is-a-game (дата обращения: 10.06.2025).
  16. Chessa S. Human rights: advances in neurotechnologies lead to calls for protection against abuse of 'brain data' / International Bar Association. – 2023. – 26 October. – URL: https://www.ibanet.org/neurotechnologies-protection-against-abuse-of-brain-data (дата обращения: 10.06.2025).
  17. Romero O.G. Cognitive liberty and the psychedelic humanities / Frontiers in Psychology. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – Article 1128996.
  18. Muñoz J.M., Marinaro J.A. Neurorights as reconceptualized human rights / Frontiers in Political Science. – 2023. – Vol. 5. – Article 1322922.
  19. EU Artificial Intelligence Act | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. – Brussels : European Commission, 2024. – URL: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu (дата обращения: 10.06.2025).
  20. Hertz N. Neurorights – Do We Need New Human Rights? A Reconsideration of the Right to Freedom of Thought / Hertz N. // SSRN Electronic Journal. – 2024. – 13 March. – doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4726652.
  21. Alegre S. Toward an International Agenda to Protect the Forum Internum / S. Alegre // CIGI Policy Brief. – 2022. – № 176. – 8 p.
  22. Ruiz S., Valera L., Ramos P., Sitaram R. Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and law in Chile / Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. – 2024. – Vol. 379. – Article 20230098.
  23. Farahany N.A. Cognitive Liberty and the Need for New Human Rights Protections / N.A. Farahany // Submission to UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. – Geneva : OHCHR, 2023. – 15 July.
  24. Alegre S. Freedom to Think: The Long Struggle to Liberate Our Minds / S. Alegre. – London : Atlantic Books, 2023. – 400 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).