Transformation of directorial intent: from linear narration to omnidirectional space
- Authors: Dobrynin O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 26-36
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0625/article/view/367430
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NZVPAM
- ID: 367430
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the study is the transformation of the director's concept in the conditions of spherical cinematography. The study analyzes the peculiarities of the director's work in the omnidirectional space. New expressive means are considered, including spatial sound and multiplanar mise-en-scene, as well as changing approaches to editing and dramaturgy. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of the viewer's perception of spherical content and the prospects for the development of this format in the film industry. The aim of this study is to examine the influence of omnidirectional space on the director's conception. The study aims to identify key changes in approaches to editing, composition and dramaturgy. The following objectives are set: to analyze the peculiarities of directorial work in 360° format; to identify new expressive means emerging in the spherical format; to determine the impact of omnidirectional narrative on the viewer's perception; to assess the prospects for the development of spherical cinema and its integration with other media. Based on the methods of comparative analysis, the paper examines the influence of omnidirectional space on directorial intent. The main conclusions of this study are that the director's usual tools are not always adapted for use in spherical space. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the work identifies promising directions for the development of spherical cinematography. The study shows that the use of omnidirectional space requires directors to develop new expressive means and strategies of interaction with the audience. The paper offers an overview of the key problems (challenges) and opportunities of spherical cinematography, which makes it relevant for theorists and practitioners in the field of audiovisual arts and will be useful for the development of new program and methodological material for student directors of various specializations.
About the authors
Oleg Vital'evich Dobrynin
Email: oleg.dobrynin.70@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4303-7457
References
Slater M., Wilbur S. A (1997). Framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments // PRESENCE. – Vol. 6. – №6. Рp. 603-616. Bailenson J. Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2018. – 304 p. Манович Л. Язык новых медиа. – М.: Ad Marginem, 2002. – 400 с. Добрынин О.В. Сферический кинематограф: трансформация киноязыка в условиях виртуальной реальности // Вестник ВГИК. 2024. Т. 16. No 1 (59). С. 106-121. Milk C. (2016). The birth of virtual reality as an art form. [Video]. TED Conferences. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_the_birth_of_virtual_reality_as_an_art_form?subtitle=en (дата обращения 25.11.24). Тарковский А. Запечатленное время. Москва: Искусство, 1984. – 254 с. Roginska A., Geluso P. Immersive Sound: The Art and Science of Binaural and Multi-Channel Audio. New York: Routledge, 2018. – 378 p. Bordwell D., Thompson K. Film Art: An Introduction. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2016. – 544 p. Ryan M. L. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. – 417 p. Разлогов К. Э. Кинопроцесс XX – начала XXI века: искусство экрана в социодинамике культуры. Теория и практика. – М.: Академический проект; Трикста, 2016. – 640 с. Разлогов К. Э. Новые аудиовизуальные технологии. – М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2005. – 488 с. Маньковская Н.Б., Бычков В.В. Современное искусство как феномен техногенной цивилизации / Н.Б. Маньковская, В.В. Бычков. – М.: ВГИК, 2011. – 210 с. Новиков В.Н. Влияние виртуальных новаций на язык кинематографа XXI века: дис. ... канд. искусствоведения: 17.00.03. Москва: ВГИК, 2015. – 154 с. Штейн С.Ю. Теория экранных форм: Введение в экранные искусства. Москва: ВГИК, 2010. – 300 с. Biocca F., Levy M. R. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995. – 416 p. Grau O. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. – 430 p. Salkeld R. Reading Photographs: An Introduction to the Theory and Meaning of Images. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2018. – 184 p. Helmrich L. R. Single Shot Cinema: The Art of Constant Movement // Film Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 65, No. 1. Pp. 36–43. Heeter C. Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence // Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1992. Vol. 1, No. 2. Pp. 262–271. Lombard M., Ditton T. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1997. Vol. 3, No. 2. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/issue/3/2 (дата обращения 25.11.24).
Supplementary files
