Ideas of Russian religious philosophy in the scientific practice of the region
- Authors: Usachev A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 1-9
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0625/article/view/367002
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DBBXYV
- ID: 367002
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Philosophical ideas in scientific practice serve as the basis of a research position, a set of methods that implement the idea within the framework of the specialty. Philosophy is able to provide clarification of the broadest context and is reflected in the content of reasoning and conclusions. Philosophy is most widely used in the formulation of questions, the formulation of topics that make it possible to actualize the heuristic potential of humanitarian specialties, serves to include problems and ideas in the list of research tasks and goals. This is especially true of those topics that, for a number of historical reasons, were ignored and kept silent. Among these, the theme of religiosity occupies a prominent place. The main conclusion of the study is the statement that research in the field of Russian religious philosophy is the foundation of modern humanitarian work. It can be produced in a separate region of the country as a pillar of humanitarian knowledge. Scientific practice, which is expressed in the dissertation process, in the genre of a scientific report, is based on the texts of Russian philosophers who were written at the turn of the XIX - XX century. It was concluded that Russian philosophical thought forms a communicative field in scientific processes, which allows for a constructive dialogue between various subjects of the scientific process.
Keywords
References
Бахтин М.М.. Формы времени и хронотопа в романе / М.М. Бахтин. – Университетская электронная библиотека. http://infolio.asf.ru: Бердяев Н.А.. Смысл творчества. Харьков. М. 2002. 688 с. Бунин И.А.. Жизнь Арсеньева / И.А. Бунин. – М.: Правда. – 1989. – С. 99-100 Флоренский П.А.. АНАЛИЗ пространственности и времени в художественно-изобразительных произведениях. – М.: Прогресс. – 1993. – С. 51. Arlig A. W. The Lost Sheep in Philosophy of Religion: New Perspectives on Disability, Gender, Race, and Animals // Faith and Philosophy.--2020.--Apr.--T. 37, № 2.--C. 248-252 Burley M. Special issue: Philosophy of Religions: Cross-Cultural, Multi-Religious Approaches Introduction // Religious Studies.--2020.--Mar.--T. 56, № 1.--C. 1-3. Erlewine R. Samuel Hirsch, Hegel, and the Legacy of Ethical Monotheism // Harvard Theological Review.--2020.--Jan.--T. 113, № 1.--C. 89-110. Hutton S. Philosophy, Religion, and Heterodoxy in the Philosophy of Henry More, Ralph Cudworth, and Anne Conway // Church History and Religious Culture.--2020.--Sep.--T. 100, № 2-3.--C. 157-171. Simmons J. A. Religious, but Not Spiritual: A Constructive Proposal // Religions.--2021.--Jun.--T. 12, № 6. Zackariasson U. Religion and the Philosophy of Life // Temenos.--2020.--T. 56, № 2.--C. 278-280.
Supplementary files
