Conflict Prevention in the Framework of Contemporary Government Procedures and International Cooperation
- Authors: Brambila Martinez F.J.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 88-93
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0617/article/view/362275
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KPFKCH
- ID: 362275
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article reviews the basic functions and interactions of the state with diverse stakeholders on a global level to identify the sources of conflict on a contemporary setting. The subject of this research is the measurement of state capacity as an outcome of governance largely influenced by the process of globalization and its repercussions on conflict prevention. The goal consists on finding possible solutions to the contemporary capacity-sovereignty dilemma under the relationship of the state with international policy brokers to shield its functions from foreign interference and threats without undermining its international participation and growth. The core definitions and characteristics of governance are determined to reveal the peculiarities and limitations of the state in preventing conflicts. The interactions of the state with a wide array of stakeholders on a global level are analyzed to assess the nature of their outcomes in relation to governance and state capacity. The capacity and legitimacy of international policy brokers in conveying the national interests of the state in the framework of international cooperation are reviewed. In order to achieve the set research goal, the author reviews the core functions of the state when interacting with international stakeholders of different configurations. In order to create the necessary conditions for conflict prevention, this work recommends the development of flexible government procedures to shield the core functions of the state as unimpeded cooperation is carried in all areas. This article provides a theoretical framework applicable to a wide array of contemporary nations for supporting the examination and elaboration of dedicated mechanisms in the conflict prevention area by reviewing the elemental processes of the state rather than analyzing particular conflicts and their causes.
References
Fukuyama F. Commentary: What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 2013-347-368 pp. Holt J., Manning N. Fukuyama is right about measuring state quality: Now what? Governance, 27(4), 2014-717-728 pp. Rotberg R. I. Good governance means performance and results. Governance, 27(3), 2014-511-518 pp. Stone D., Ladi S. Global public policy and transnational administration.Public Administration, 93(4), 2015-839-855 pp. Coleman W. D. Governance and global public policy, Oxford University Press, 2012 – 673-685 pp. Peck J. Global policy models, globalizing poverty management: International convergence of fast-policy integration? Geography Compass, 5(4), 2011-165-181 pp. Bernstein S., Cashore B. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1, 2007-347-371 pp. Abbott K. W. International organisations and international regulatory co-operation: Exploring the links. In OECD (Ed.), International Regulatory Co-operation and International Organisations: The Cases of the OECD and the IMO, OECD, Paris, 2014-17-44 pp. Arndt C., Oman C. (2008). The Politics of Governance Ratings, Maastricht: Maastricht University, 2008-17 p.
Supplementary files
